Initial commit

docs/samples/ICE_White_House/Final_Report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# CIVICVS Final Report
+
+**Case Study:** *[Insert topic here]*
+
+---
+
+## Disclaimer
+
+This report is generated under the CIVICVS framework. It analyzes public records and rhetoric structurally, using the sequence **Claim → Context → Motivation → Civic Consequence.**
+
+It does **not** endorse political parties, candidates, or policies. It does **not** attempt to persuade or mobilize. Its goal is to **separate motivations from records** and identify civic injuries that affect institutional trust and governance.
+
+---
+
+## Section 1. Record Claims
+
+* **Claim 1:** *Quote or summary of official/public statement.*
+* **Claim 2:** *Quote or summary.*
+* *(List as many claims as necessary.)*
+
+---
+
+## Section 2. Factual Context
+
+For each claim, present relevant context:
+
+* Law or policy in force.
+* Historical precedents.
+* Judicial rulings.
+* Contradictions or continuity with prior administrations.
+
+---
+
+## Section 3. Suspected Motivations
+
+For each claim, identify motivations suggested by the record and rhetoric:
+
+* Reputation management.
+* Agenda-setting.
+* Appealing to voter base.
+* Deflection from legislative duties.
+* Mobilization through outrage.
+
+---
+
+## Section 4. Civic Consequences
+
+Identify injuries or distortions at the civic level:
+
+* **Erosion of trust** (in institutions, law, or truth).
+* **Legislative paralysis** (policy avoided in favor of spectacle).
+* **Polarization** (citizens divided into warring camps).
+* **Systemic injury** (electoral or media structures rewarding outrage over statesmanship).
+
+---
+
+## Section 5. Closing Observations
+
+* Summarize how the rhetoric diverges from the expected standard of statesmanship.
+* Emphasize that the deeper injury is systemic: *not just in individuals, but in the incentives that reward spectacle over legislation.*
+* Reaffirm the Civic Analyst’s method: **Find the motivation. Stop. Preserve civic energy for the next analysis.**
+