Initial create

docs/OPT — CIVICVS Framework — Consolidated Summary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# OPT — CIVICVS Framework — Consolidated Summary.md
+
+*Optional consolidated overview of all 12 civic artifacts and their clarified usage.*  
+*This file may be adapted by each Civic Analyst. Some may choose to use it as a checklist of what artifacts appear in a text, while others may invert it — analyzing which artifacts are absent or irrelevant.*  
+*Not every LLM will require this file; it is provided as a flexible orientation aid.*  
+
+---
+
+## 🌐 CIVICVS Framework — Consolidated Summary
+
+### Core Principle
+CIVICVS is a **public ledger of civic artifacts** — textual and narrative fragments preserved not for their decoration but for their role in shaping civic memory. It refuses to fight narrative with narrative. Instead, it anchors public discourse to **auditable records** that endure beyond distortion, omission, or manipulation.
+
+---
+
+### The Twelve Civic Artifacts
+1. **Title** – Anchor of framing.  
+2. **Subtitle** – Compression of complexity into a single thrust.  
+3. **Pull-quote** – Selective amplification.  
+4. **Section header** – Silent segmentation of cognition.  
+5. **Timeline phrase** – Narrative glue bending chronology.  
+6. **Label & credential** – Reputation claims without proof.  
+7. **Quotation** – Trimmed, framed, and context-dependent speech.  
+8. **Timeline event** – Dated, sourced record restoring causality.  
+9. **Entity graph** – Map of actors, donors, organizations, institutions.  
+10. **Evidence table** – Ledger of claims, methods, sources.  
+11. **Context lens** – Institutional tests (codes, human capital, enforcement).  
+12. **Civic consequence** – Societal impact beyond narrative.  
+
+---
+
+### Method & Process
+- **Selective first pass**: The LLM proposes only detected artifacts; it does not fill empty slots or cross-link them.  
+- **Independent entry points**: Analysts may start with any artifact and ignore others.  
+- **Adversarial accumulation**: Analysts may add, attack, or discredit earlier records. Failures remain preserved.  
+- **Immutable publishing**: Once pinned to IPFS, a Ledger is authoritative. Drafts are irrelevant.  
+- **No canonical versioning**: Each Ledger is unique. Repeated analysis of the same topic is encouraged but never revisions.  
+
+---
+
+### Authorship & Responsibility
+- **Human sovereignty**: Analysts alone take credit and responsibility. The LLM is a tool, not a co-author.  
+- **Identity**: Analysts may use pen names, but credibility is tied to verifiable Internet identity.  
+- **Citizenship rule**: Only natural-born or naturalized citizens may publish Ledgers for their own polity.  
+- **One shot per topic**: Analysts cannot defend or revise after publication.  
+
+---
+
+### Publication & Persistence
+- **Private phase**: Drafting in Gitea repositories.  
+- **Milestone**: Publishing and pinning to IPFS.  
+- **Public Ledger**: Immutable, append-only, open to scrutiny.  
+- **Survival by pinning**: Discredited or irrelevant Ledgers vanish; widely pinned ones endure.  
+- **Institutional anchors**: Libraries and universities may act as long-term pinners.  
+
+---
+
+### Limits & Boundaries
+- **No defense, no dialogue**: Analysts publish and step away.  
+- **No comparison**: Ledgers stand independently.  
+- **No discovery tools**: Persistence is organic, not indexed.  
+- **No institutionalization**: CIVICVS is a method and a ledger, not a movement.  
+
+---
+
+## **Closing Declaration**
+
+This file may be revised. Any future updates will be based only on **public records widely available**, and only after such phenomena rise above the level of **temporary annoyance** and into the realm of enduring civic consequence.
+
+---
+
+### Purpose
+CIVICVS exists to preserve **civic artifacts as public memory**, beyond the reach of framing, propaganda, or revisionism. Accountability is enforced through:  
+- Risked reputation of analysts.  
+- Immutability of pinned Ledgers.  
+- Accumulated adversarial scrutiny over time.  
+
+**Truth in CIVICVS does not rely on consensus or confidence scores. It survives by endurance.**