From 99ca3b2122c4bd052a308769f98ec822639f8a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheRON <webmaster@kane-il.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 17:19:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Initial commit

---
 docs/08_Templates_and_AI_Workflow.md | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 docs/08_Templates_and_AI_Workflow.md

diff --git a/docs/08_Templates_and_AI_Workflow.md b/docs/08_Templates_and_AI_Workflow.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c064e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/08_Templates_and_AI_Workflow.md
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# Templates & AI Workflow — Civicus
+
+This document explains **how a Civic Analyst uses AI in practice**.
+It is not about over-qualifying the Analyst with endless checklists; it is about ensuring discipline, transparency, and finality.
+
+The Civic Analyst and the AI are **partners**:
+
+* The Analyst provides **purpose and judgment**.
+* The AI enforces **rigor, memory, and transparency**.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Preparing the Analysis
+
+1. **Upload the full set of project files**
+
+   * Always begin with the complete record (currently 11 files).
+   * If a published, immutable version exists (e.g., IPFS), use that.
+   * Otherwise, use the Git repository as source.
+
+2. **Confirm AI understanding**
+
+   * The first prompt is always:
+
+     > *“Do you understand the purpose and the process of this Project, and are you ready to start building the next Analysis?”*
+   * This forces the AI to confirm scope before work begins.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Conducting the Analysis
+
+* **Conversation as Process**
+
+  * Work issue by issue, document by document.
+  * No multi-step “runaway” outputs. The AI must stay in dialogue.
+
+* **Recording the Conversation**
+
+  * Save every exchange.
+  * Append the transcript to `11_Appendix_Conversation.md`.
+  * The conversation itself is part of the civic evidence.
+
+* **Controlling AI Behavior**
+
+  * The AI tends to outline too much or skip detail.
+  * Stop it. Remind it:
+
+    > *“We are doing professional work. Stay focused on this single issue until it is complete.”*
+
+---
+
+## 3. Anchoring Purpose
+
+* **Remind Yourself**
+
+  * The Civic Analyst is not chasing clicks, donors, or applause.
+  * The role is **context, authenticity, independence**.
+
+* **Remind the AI**
+
+  * Instruct it to pull you back if you drift toward narrative or speculation.
+  * Example:
+
+    > *“If I slide into narrative, speculation, or credentialism, remind me of Civic Analyst standards.”*
+
+* **Single-Chance Principle**
+
+  * Every analysis is published once.
+  * The AI helps refine drafts until ready — then stops.
+  * After publication, improvement only comes through new analyses by other Civic Analysts.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Purpose of the AI
+
+The AI is not here to replace the Analyst. Its functions are:
+
+* **Restoring context** — ensuring claims are set in their civic and institutional frame.
+* **Testing reasoning** — surfacing gaps, contradictions, or overreach.
+* **Preserving transparency** — capturing the full conversation for audit.
+* **Guarding independence** — reminding the Analyst when standards are at risk.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Outcome
+
+* Drafts may live in Git, but Git is **not immutable**.
+* True publication occurs only when reports are pinned immutably (IPFS, Arweave, notarized hashes).
+* Once published, the report stands as a **single civic artifact**:
+
+  * Transparent.
+  * Immutable.
+  * Open to judgment.
+
+---
+
+## Closing Declaration
+
+This workflow defines how Civic Analysts use AI to produce disciplined, auditable, and final reports.
+It will not be revised. Any future improvement must come from new analyses published by other Civic Analysts.
+
+---