Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e866c45a6
commit
ab563f38c2
|
@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||||
|
# Code of Conduct — Civicus
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The Civic Analyst operates under strict discipline.
|
||||||
|
The purpose of this Code is to preserve **independence, integrity, authenticity, and transparency**, while preventing the profession from collapsing into narrative activism or polemics.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 1. Independence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Disclose funding, affiliations, and any **conflicts of interest**.
|
||||||
|
* No anonymous major funders for published work.
|
||||||
|
* The Civic Analyst must not be captured by sponsors, employers, or partisan institutions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2. Integrity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The Civic Analyst has **one chance to publish** each analysis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Once published, a report stands as a single civic artifact.
|
||||||
|
* No revisions, edits, or silent updates are permitted.
|
||||||
|
* This ensures:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Analysts can move on to new concerns rather than defending entrenched positions.
|
||||||
|
* Multiple analysts may examine the same issue without attacking each other.
|
||||||
|
* Talent and rigor are benchmarked by clarity of the **one-shot artifact**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 3. Authenticity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Use **immutable preservation** for all source materials.
|
||||||
|
* Publish hash manifests, timestamps, and archival records where possible.
|
||||||
|
* Recognize that a Git repository is not immutable:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Analysts control their own repos and can alter history.
|
||||||
|
* Only once reports are **pinned immutably** (e.g., IPFS, Arweave, notarized hashes) do they achieve permanence.
|
||||||
|
* Until Civic Analysts form a network that mirrors and pins reports, every project remains incomplete.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 4. Transparency
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Preserve and publish the **full LLM conversation** and revision history.
|
||||||
|
* Append transcripts in `11_Appendix_Conversation.md`.
|
||||||
|
* Every reasoning step, including failed drafts and corrections, must be open to scrutiny.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 5. Respect
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Critique **institutions, policies, and behaviors**, not demographic identity.
|
||||||
|
* When discussing religion or ideology, evaluate **governance outcomes and capacity**, not private belief.
|
||||||
|
* Criticism of frameworks such as Islam is permitted when it addresses their civic and institutional consequences.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 6. Public Responsibility
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Civic Analysts are not only private authors; they set a standard for **governments and institutions**.
|
||||||
|
* Local governments, public officials, and agencies should adopt similar rules:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Hourly or near-real-time data collection.
|
||||||
|
* Immutable archiving of public health, election, and safety records.
|
||||||
|
* Public release of both raw and anonymized/tabulated data.
|
||||||
|
* Example: During COVID-19, the absence of hourly diagnostic and mortality data fueled conspiracy theories.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Suppression or delay of granular records breeds mistrust.
|
||||||
|
* Opacity is itself civic malpractice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Closing Declaration
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This Code defines the ethical and methodological discipline of the Civic Analyst.
|
||||||
|
It will not be revised. Any future improvement must come from new analyses or new codes published by other Civic Analysts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue