diff --git a/docs/05_Evidence_Journalism_Ivory_Tower_and_Kirk.md b/docs/05_Evidence_Journalism_Ivory_Tower_and_Kirk.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3d2907b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/05_Evidence_Journalism_Ivory_Tower_and_Kirk.md
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Evidence Deep Dive: Journalism’s Ivory Tower — Title Framing and Outsider Ascent
+
+## Claim
+
+Credentialist norms inside journalism shape **framing**, delegitimizing outsiders who rise
+without elite diplomas — particularly when they sit **outside** the profession’s ideological center.
+
+The BBC profile of Charlie Kirk illustrates this in full, framing him through a lens of **credential deficiency and political suspicion**:
+
+* Main title: *“How a college dropout from the suburbs became Maga star Charlie Kirk”*
+* Section header: *“A meteoric rise to MAGA star”*
+* Label: *“Hard-right Trump loyalist”*
+
+*Source:*
+Bernd Debusmann Jr. & Mike Wendling. *“How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally.”*
+**BBC News**, 13 September 2025.
+[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33r4kjez6no](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33r4kjez6no)
+(Local copy preserved in this repo as `Charlie Kirk_ How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally.pdf`).
+*Accessed 13 September 2025, 6:53 AM (UTC-5).*
+
+The duality is pronounced: Kirk’s only disqualifying feature is his **political alignment**.
+His organizational achievements, fundraising, and ability to build civic institutions are obscured by a narrative of dropout status and ideological menace.
+
+---
+
+## Context (Sociology of Professions)
+
+* **Market for Prestige**: Newsrooms allocate status and assignments via education, pedigree, and network capital.
+* **Narrative Gatekeeping**: Titles and ledes signal legitimacy (“doctor,” “professor,” or “dropout”). These signals bias reader priors before any argument is heard.
+* **Asymmetric Celebration**: Outsider ascents aligned with the field’s dominant politics are cast as grit; oppositional ascents as menace.
+
+Even in **new media** (podcasts, YouTube, independent outlets), the same entropy applies:
+
+* Initial bursts of authenticity degrade into repetition, sponsor-driven messaging, or partisan echo chambers.
+* Audience size becomes the benchmark rather than quality of evidence.
+* Sponsors and donors inevitably shape tone and focus.
+
+The Civic Analyst must remain immune to this erosion. **Follower count does not matter.**
+**Sponsor transparency and quality of work are the only benchmarks.**
+
+---
+
+## Forensic Title Analysis (Executed)
+
+* **Identity markers in BBC headline**: “college dropout,” “from the suburbs.”
+* **Valence**: framed pejoratively — signaling deficiency rather than accomplishment.
+* **Contrast**: figures on the Left or in culturally favored causes with similar or lower formal education are often celebrated as “authentic,” “self-made,” or “grassroots.”
+
+The subtitles intensify this framing:
+
+* *“A meteoric rise to MAGA star”* — attributing his ascent to spectacle rather than institution-building.
+* *“Hard-right Trump loyalist”* — attaching ideological labels that reduce the subject to partisanship.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+When elite professions defend their tower, the **public square** narrows. Citizens inherit **pre-judgments** instead of arguments.
+
+Journalism — old or new — cannot escape entropy and bias.
+The Civic Analyst exists to **complement** journalism, podcasts, and independent media, precisely because **none of them are reliable** on their own.
+
+The Civic Analyst re-opens the square by **measuring framing**, exposing asymmetries, and grounding evaluation in evidence rather than credentialism or ideological alignment.
+
+---
+
+## Closing Declaration
+
+This deep dive demonstrates that credentialism and ideological bias distort journalistic framing, narrowing the civic square.
+It will not be revised. Any future improvement must come from new analyses published by other Civic Analysts.
+
+---