TheRON/kane-diagnostics
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 4 Wiki Activity

Initial push

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
TheRON
2026-06-13 08:11:22 -04:00
parent cf92add04b
commit 286ce661cd
5 changed files with 155 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

35
hubzilla/addon/dsc01/diagnostic-categories/DSC-06-management-company.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
{
"_meta": {
"code": "DSC-06",
"title": "Management Company",
"cai_reference": "Management Company",
"homeowner_relevance": "High",
"development_status": "Active",
"summary": "The management company is the primary operational contact for most homeowners and the entity most likely to control records, finances, and communications. Management company disputes involve certification status, scope of authority, conflicts of interest, and actions taken outside the management contract.",
"vital_sign_dependencies": [
{
"code": "VS-03",
"relevance": "The central Vital Sign for this category: is the manager IDFPR-licensed and CAI-certified?"
},
{
"code": "VS-04",
"relevance": "The most structurally dangerous condition: the same entity managing operations and finances"
},
{
"code": "VS-02",
"relevance": "Small associations cannot attract certified managers from the open market"
},
{
"code": "VS-06",
"relevance": "Bylaws that do not require certification enable uncertified management indefinitely"
}
],
"diagnostic_questions": [
"Is the property manager IDFPR-licensed as a Community Association Manager?",
"Does the manager hold any CAI certification recognized by courts as evidence of professional competence?",
"Does the same entity serve as both property manager and financial manager?",
"Has the manager acted outside the scope of their contract \u2014 initiating legal action, withholding records, or controlling payments \u2014 without Board authorization?",
"Did the manager stop ACH withdrawals without notice, then participate in a delinquency claim based on the non-payment that resulted?"
]
}
}

30
hubzilla/addon/dsc01/diagnostic-categories/DSC-07-covenant-enforcement.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"_meta": {
"code": "DSC-07",
"title": "Covenant Enforcement",
"cai_reference": "Covenant Enforcement",
"homeowner_relevance": "High",
"development_status": "Active",
"summary": "Selective, retaliatory, or procedurally defective enforcement is one of the most commonly documented diagnostic conditions. Enforcement disputes involve the consistency of rule application, the adequacy of notice, the proportionality of the response, and the correlation between enforcement actions and prior homeowner complaints or document requests.",
"vital_sign_dependencies": [
{
"code": "VS-05",
"relevance": "Enforcement authority may be based on outdated or void Bylaw provisions"
},
{
"code": "VS-06",
"relevance": "Unqualified Board members may enforce rules inconsistently, selectively, or retaliatorily"
},
{
"code": "VS-04",
"relevance": "Consolidated control enables simultaneous financial and enforcement pressure against the same homeowner"
}
],
"diagnostic_questions": [
"Was the rule applied consistently across all similarly situated homeowners?",
"Was the homeowner notified of the rule \u2014 and given a copy of the rule \u2014 before enforcement began?",
"Was the enforcement action proportionate to the alleged violation?",
"Did enforcement actions escalate after the homeowner filed a complaint, requested documents, or attempted to organize other homeowners?"
]
}
}

30
hubzilla/addon/dsc01/diagnostic-categories/DSC-08-attorneys-fees.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"_meta": {
"code": "DSC-08",
"title": "Attorney's Fees",
"cai_reference": "Attorney's Fees",
"homeowner_relevance": "High",
"development_status": "Active",
"summary": "Attorney fee shifting is the mechanism by which document access enforcement becomes affordable or unaffordable for homeowners, and the mechanism by which the association converts assessment disputes into legal expenses the homeowner funds through their own assessments.",
"vital_sign_dependencies": [
{
"code": "VS-03",
"relevance": "Uncertified managers generating unnecessary legal activity without professional accountability"
},
{
"code": "VS-04",
"relevance": "Consolidated entity billing both management fees and legal coordination fees to the same homeowner account"
},
{
"code": "VS-09",
"relevance": "Attorney fees charged to homeowner accounts without independent verification of the amount or authorization"
}
],
"diagnostic_questions": [
"Were attorney fees charged to the homeowner's account \u2014 and were those fees properly authorized by the Board?",
"Does the amount charged to the homeowner's account match what the attorney actually billed the association?",
"Were fees charged for a cease and desist that was sent after the homeowner had already complied?",
"Does the total amount spent by the association in attorney fees exceed the amount actually in dispute \u2014 and by what ratio?"
]
}
}

30
hubzilla/addon/dsc01/diagnostic-categories/DSC-09-maintenance.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"_meta": {
"code": "DSC-09",
"title": "Maintenance",
"cai_reference": "Maintenance",
"homeowner_relevance": "High",
"development_status": "Active",
"summary": "Maintenance obligation disputes define what the association is responsible for versus what the homeowner is responsible for. The misallocation of repair costs \u2014 charging homeowners for repairs that are the association's statutory obligation \u2014 is a recurring diagnostic condition closely linked to assessment and contract disputes.",
"vital_sign_dependencies": [
{
"code": "VS-01",
"relevance": "Maintenance boundaries differ by statute, Declaration, and unit configuration"
},
{
"code": "VS-09",
"relevance": "Without independent audit, maintenance expenditures and their allocation cannot be verified"
},
{
"code": "VS-05",
"relevance": "Old Bylaws may describe maintenance boundaries that predate current construction standards or statutory requirements"
}
],
"diagnostic_questions": [
"Was the maintenance obligation correctly assigned \u2014 association common element or homeowner unit \u2014 under the applicable statute and Declaration?",
"Was the repair properly authorized by the Board?",
"Was the cost properly allocated among unit owners \u2014 and was the allocation methodology disclosed?",
"Was the homeowner charged for a repair that was the association's statutory obligation?"
]
}
}

30
hubzilla/addon/dsc01/diagnostic-categories/DSC-10-foreclosure.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"_meta": {
"code": "DSC-10",
"title": "Foreclosure",
"cai_reference": "Foreclosure",
"homeowner_relevance": "Critical",
"development_status": "Active",
"summary": "Foreclosure is the terminal enforcement action. It represents the complete failure of every prior diagnostic condition \u2014 document access was denied, financial records were withheld, assessments were disputed, and legal escalation was chosen over resolution. A homeowner facing foreclosure needs to understand whether every statutory precondition was met.",
"vital_sign_dependencies": [
{
"code": "VS-01",
"relevance": "Foreclosure authority, lien priority, and procedure differ significantly by statute"
},
{
"code": "VS-08",
"relevance": "A dissolved corporation may have no valid lien or foreclosure authority"
},
{
"code": "VS-09",
"relevance": "The amount claimed in a foreclosure action must be independently verifiable"
}
],
"diagnostic_questions": [
"Was the lien properly recorded with the County Recorder of Deeds \u2014 and at the correct amount?",
"Was the amount claimed in the foreclosure action accurate, itemized, and reconcilable against the homeowner's own records?",
"Were all statutory notice requirements met before the lien was recorded and before the foreclosure action was filed?",
"Was the foreclosure action authorized by a validly constituted Board with current corporate standing?"
]
}
}