c72036cbbbe76d62e8dbe032823cdd953757bec3
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
c72036cbbb |
docs: the ACL leaves the roadmap, and the development-name excuse is withdrawn
Four documents brought into line with what landed at |
||
|
|
6ce8ece709 |
docs: F-037, the ingress corrections, and the priority order reversed
HANDOFF section 4 said WORK-ORDER-004 was pending and that CIVICVS could not see any of this work. It was rewritten thirty-two minutes after |
||
|
|
a7162bc1d5 |
docs: assemblies are out of scope by design, and the priority order
CIVICVS ruled on 11 SEP that the absence of an assembly layer is chosen, not unfinished. Positioning is field work. Parts made and shipped by different manufacturers have no knowledge of each other assembly tolerances, and interchangeable manufacture works because of that separation rather than in spite of it. Fit up is resolved on site against conditions no designer had. PRECISION.md section 7 now says so, and closes with read this as a boundary that was chosen, not a gap to be filled. Section 10 corrected. Its lock is on this document subject, not on the software roadmap, and it was misread that way once. Section 7 holds two kinds of entry: limits that may be lifted by work, and boundaries that were chosen and should not be. Without that distinction section 7 reads as a to do list. Section 7 also separates geometry interchange from machine instructions. An STL or STEP describes a shape; a toolpath describes what a machine should do. The first is in scope and planned, the second is not. The two sat one line apart with nothing saying they differ in kind. HANDOFF section 5 corrected: STL export needs no CAD kernel. A member here is prismatic by definition, so an STL is two triangulated caps and a quad strip. Verified in CT 100 that shapely constrained_delaunay_triangles handles a polygon with a hole correctly, area exact and no triangle inside the hole. That second check is the one that matters, because a triangulator that fills bores produces an STL which looks right in a slicer and prints solid where the conduit goes. STEP still needs the kernel. Priority order recorded with its reasoning so a successor can disagree with the argument rather than only the sequence. STL export first because it is the only item producing physical feedback. Then an authorship field in the design record, one field and a one way door. Then per member stock for the conduit core. Then persistence, which nothing has ever written despite MECHCOMP_DATA_DIR being declared since staging. Then ACL, last, because access control over nothing is machinery without a subject. A node is not an assembly. It is another artifact with declared interfaces and stays in scope. What is out of scope is positioning artifacts relative to one another. The project obligation is therefore to make each artifact interchangeable, which is what the stock descriptor and the design record already exist for. |
||
|
|
39a6b02c63 |
docs: HANDOFF corrected against the tree, and PROCESS.md put first
A new section 0 gives the reading order with PROCESS.md at the top. The handoff never mentioned it. That is the root cause of three sets of instructions the operator could not execute in one session: an SSH to a host he does not reach that way, a LAN address behind a portless bridge, and a hosts file name that resolves on three machines.
The access model is now stated rather than only defended. The settled decisions said questioning Webmin wasted a session but never recorded what the arrangement is, so it was questioned again. It now records that he works from Webmin on the hub and into the srv-b shell, and that dev.infra names and 10.20.0.x addresses are never to be given as browser URLs.
The module table filed Geo and Member under primitives.py, where they have never been, and omitted records.py entirely. Two modules were read on the strength of it and neither held what it promised. Corrected, with the error named so it is not re-derived, plus rows for stock.py, design_record.py, svg.py and web/app.py.
Sections 3 and 4 described a world with no application in it: main two commits back, 468 passing, the catalogue front end does not exist, deployment blocked on application code. Now 529 passing at
|
||
|
|
6836ece4ff |
tests: close F-034; bound the derived trio at 8 ULP of the oracle record
The oracle records six significant figures, so the last digit of an area near 200 mm2 is worth 0.001 mm2. Every measured disagreement between port and reference is one, two or three units in that place. SECTION_AREA_MM2, VOLUME_MM3 and MASS_G are now bounded at 8 ULP of the expected value. Everything that positions material keeps the declared 1e-4 mm and remains exact in all 123 cases. Option 1 scope kept, derivation rejected on measurement. Max |dA|/P over the accepted set is 1.434e-05 mm, one seven-hundredth of the 0.01 mm criterion, so a perimeter x 0.01 bound would have run 1800 to 4500 times the worst real discrepancy and caught nothing. Perimeter also anti-correlates with the error. Suite 468 passed, 0 failed. The 30 expected failures are resolved, not suppressed. Mutation tested before landing: worst case uses 37.5 percent of its bound, 12 ULP offsets and 1e-4 relative scalings are caught in all 113 cases, 1e-6 and 1e-5 correctly are not. Adds docs/ACCEPTANCE.md as the specification. Adds F-036, the venv interpreter error, same class as F-035. Corrects the F-034 per-profile distribution to Three-Fin 10, Y 7, A Frame 6, Rectangle 5, T 1, Four-Fin 1, which sums to the stated 30. |
||
|
|
52d00b588b |
docs: record the F-034 decision in HANDOFF.md
CIVICVS approved option 1 on 20 AUG: scale-aware bounds in test_oracle.py for SECTION_AREA_MM2, VOLUME_MM3 and MASS_G, derived from the 0.01 mm criterion and the section perimeter. Not implemented yet. Implementation, mutation testing and a green suite are one piece of work, not a partial landing. Section 4 item 2 is removed. The F-034 measurement rewrite in FAILURES.md landed in |
||
|
|
b255ebbab9 |
docs: handoff rewritten for the post-port state; F-034 measured
HANDOFF.md rewritten in place, as it is meant to be. The port is complete,
so the document now describes that state rather than the work leading to it.
Most important change for whoever reads it next: the suite is 436 passed,
30 failed, and section 3 says plainly that the 30 are expected and a red
`make test` is not a broken port. Without that line the next assistant
spends its opening exchange rediscovering what is already known.
Also added: the 0.01 mm accuracy criterion as a settled decision; that
defaults are per-family and differ (ring_corner_radius_mm is 2.00 in 3x
and 1.25 in 4x); that check declaration order is the reporting order; that
params carries only a case's overrides; and pointers to PRECISION.md for
what the compiler does not do.
F-034 rewritten around measurement rather than estimate. The original Y
evidence is preserved verbatim -- it was specific and hard-won. What is
new:
- the same mechanism at 90 degree ring corners, where the expression is
exactly 12 rather than exactly 8. Rectangle: reference envelope 50
vertices, port 48.
- which side is noisy, which was previously unstated and turns out to
matter. Instrumented at %.17g the port prints half=45 raw=12 ceil=12
on every call. It lands on the integer deterministically; the
reference does not. A guard cannot make the port match noise it does
not have, so there is nothing left to try on this side.
- the scale: 30 of 113 accepted cases, 83 exact, worst relative error
2.24e-05, confined to SECTION_AREA_MM2 and its two derivatives.
- the physical magnitude: chord deviation is r*(1-cos 3.75deg), so
0.0027 mm at r=1.25 and 0.0043 mm at r=2.00. The two implementations
differ from each other by at most ~0.4 um. Two orders inside the
0.01 mm criterion.
- the constraint on any fix: the tolerance block is inside the hashed
oracle document, so the change belongs in test_oracle.py.
Status stays Open. The decision is CIVICVS's and has not been made.
|
||
|
|
af196a26f5 |
docs: one canonical handoff, rewritten in place; F-035
Handoff documents were additive. HANDOFF-2026-08-19 opened by saying the 18 AUG document still applied in full and added to it. After ten sessions a new assistant would face ten documents to read in date order and diff mentally to work out what is currently true. That cost grows every session and none of it is necessary. docs/HANDOFF.md is now the only handoff, rewritten in place each session. It is state, not a log. The dated ones move to docs/archive/ and stop being required reading. It is standalone: everything still true from both is carried forward. Section 1 is invocation, stated as facts rather than demonstrated in examples. That is the other half of the problem. runuser appeared only inside example commands, so it could be learned by pattern matching but not by reading, which fails exactly when an assistant composes a command from scratch. That is what happened, and it is F-035: su cannot run as a nologin service user, both commands returned the same message before touching anything, and the output read as a broken repository when the tree was clean and the suite passed. The F-027 class again. Also stated as facts: bash tools/ not ./tools/, all repository operations as mechcomp, Gitea SSH on 42022, pct push then chown, explicit timeouts, journalctl not /var/log, systemd-run for long jobs, and assert the guest is running before interpreting any pct exec result. Not done: the same facts should be cross referenced from PROCESS.md. I no longer had that file in view and would not patch a document I cannot see. |