Answers, in plain language, what "accurate" means for this project: the
difference between model precision, machine resolution and achieved
accuracy, and why a design file should be far tighter than any machine
that will realise it.
Scoped hard to additive and subtractive manufacturing (section 0).
Formative processes, crystal growth, lithography, joining, metrology and
surface finish are explicitly out. Section 10 asks that additions widening
that scope be refused rather than accommodated -- a borrowed tolerance
figure carries no evidence from this project while looking exactly as
authoritative as a measured one.
Section 7 states what the compiler does NOT do: no assembly layer, no
structural analysis of any kind, prismatic shapes only, no toolpaths,
verified only within its tested range. A part passing every check here may
still be structurally unsound.
Records the facets limit: at facets=48, corner radii up to 4.67 mm stay
within 0.01 mm of a true curve. Above that facets must rise, growing with
the square root of radius.
TheRON
114189c0cb