A new section 0 gives the reading order with PROCESS.md at the top. The handoff never mentioned it. That is the root cause of three sets of instructions the operator could not execute in one session: an SSH to a host he does not reach that way, a LAN address behind a portless bridge, and a hosts file name that resolves on three machines.
The access model is now stated rather than only defended. The settled decisions said questioning Webmin wasted a session but never recorded what the arrangement is, so it was questioned again. It now records that he works from Webmin on the hub and into the srv-b shell, and that dev.infra names and 10.20.0.x addresses are never to be given as browser URLs.
The module table filed Geo and Member under primitives.py, where they have never been, and omitted records.py entirely. Two modules were read on the strength of it and neither held what it promised. Corrected, with the error named so it is not re-derived, plus rows for stock.py, design_record.py, svg.py and web/app.py.
Sections 3 and 4 described a world with no application in it: main two commits back, 468 passing, the catalogue front end does not exist, deployment blocked on application code. Now 529 passing at a8081e1 with the composer live behind the proxy, and the next work named as per member stock, which is what the conduit core actually needs.
TheRON
39a6b02c63