diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 2350e8d..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,306 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0002
-## Same Rumor, Six Readings
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
-### Purpose: Teach that the same uncertain report is interpreted differently by each actor profile according to role, access, risk focus, and preferred action
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia hears a rumor:
-
-> The timber convoy from Capua is delayed.
-
-The rumor is incomplete.
-
-It does not say:
-
-- why the convoy is delayed
-- how long the delay will last
-- whether the timber is damaged
-- who owns the cargo
-- who is waiting for it
-- whether the delay is already known by others
-
-The six actor perspectives do not hear the same rumor in the same way.
-
-They ask different questions and choose different first actions.
-
----
-
-## 1. Shared Rumor Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---|
-| Location where rumor is heard | Ostia |
-| Reported event | timber convoy delayed |
-| Origin of convoy | Capua route |
-| Cargo | timber, not fully confirmed |
-| Report source | porter repeating road talk |
-| Report age | unknown |
-| Confirmed cause | unknown |
-| Confirmed duration | unknown |
-| Confirmed market effect | unknown |
-
-All six actors begin with the same report.
-
-The report is not enough to calculate profit.
-
-It is enough to begin interpretation.
-
----
-
-## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
-
-Varro reads the rumor as a movement problem.
-
-He asks:
-
-- where is the convoy stopped?
-- is the road blocked?
-- are animals tired or injured?
-- is the delay from weather, breakage, guard failure, or disorder?
-- can another route move faster?
-- who can confirm the physical obstruction?
-
-Varro does not first ask what timber prices will do.
-
-He asks whether movement itself is reliable.
-
-### Varro Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: what movement failed?
-first action: locate physical cause and alternate route
-risk focus: delay, blocked road, weak escort, damaged cart
-confidence source: direct observation or reliable movement report
-```
-
-For Varro, the rumor matters because it may reveal a route or discipline failure.
-
----
-
-## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
-
-Felix reads the rumor as a possible mispricing window.
-
-He asks:
-
-- who still believes timber will arrive on time?
-- who already needs substitute material?
-- who is holding timber without repricing it?
-- can cheap stock be bought before the rumor spreads?
-- can panic buyers be served before confirmation?
-- who wants coin now because their expected delivery failed?
-
-Felix does not require full truth before acting.
-
-He wants to know who is late to adjust.
-
-### Felix Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: who has not yet repriced?
-first action: find underpriced substitute timber or distressed seller
-risk focus: rumor false, price window closing, rivals moving first
-confidence source: visible buying behavior and quick comparison
-```
-
-For Felix, the rumor matters because belief changes price before truth settles.
-
----
-
-## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
-
-Lentulus reads the rumor as an access and patronage signal.
-
-He asks:
-
-- whose timber is delayed?
-- which household or contractor is exposed?
-- which workshop or building project waits on the cargo?
-- who can be introduced to whom?
-- can assistance create obligation from a better family?
-- would involvement improve or harm his standing?
-
-Lentulus is less interested in the timber than in the names attached to it.
-
-### Lentulus Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: whose need becomes visible?
-first action: identify names behind cargo, buyer, and exposed obligation
-risk focus: wrong association, low-status entanglement, visible failure
-confidence source: family networks, introductions, socially credible reports
-```
-
-For Lentulus, the rumor matters because delay exposes dependency among people of standing.
-
----
-
-## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
-
-Crispus reads the rumor as a possible claim, dispute, or enforceability problem.
-
-He asks:
-
-- was delivery promised by a date?
-- who is liable for delay?
-- was payment advanced?
-- who witnessed the agreement?
-- does the delay trigger penalty, renegotiation, or petition?
-- can settlement pressure arise before the timber arrives?
-
-Crispus treats the rumor as the beginning of a procedural question.
-
-### Crispus Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: what obligation is now strained?
-first action: identify contract terms, witnesses, and exposed parties
-risk focus: unenforceable claim, disputed terms, delayed payment
-confidence source: documents, witnesses, clerks, formal notice
-```
-
-For Crispus, the rumor matters because delay may change bargaining power through obligations.
-
----
-
-## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
-
-Secundus reads the rumor as a capacity and replacement problem.
-
-He asks:
-
-- what kind of timber is delayed?
-- who needs it today?
-- what substitutes exist?
-- what carts, animals, and handlers are tied up?
-- what secondary work stops without the timber?
-- can another load be combined with the return movement?
-
-Secundus does not treat timber as one generic material.
-
-He asks what function the missing timber served.
-
-### Secundus Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: what work stops because this load is late?
-first action: map dependent materials, carts, labor, and substitute stock
-risk focus: wrong timber type, underestimated replacement need, wasted movement
-confidence source: handlers, cart owners, craftsmen, visible load patterns
-```
-
-For Secundus, the rumor matters because a missing input interrupts linked work.
-
----
-
-## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
-
-Chresimus reads the rumor as an accounting and record problem.
-
-He asks:
-
-- was the timber already paid for?
-- is the cargo pledged to someone?
-- is storage reserved?
-- has a buyer recorded expected delivery?
-- do accounts assume the timber arrived?
-- who becomes exposed if the cargo is late?
-
-Chresimus is less concerned with the rumor itself than with which records now fail to match reality.
-
-### Chresimus Interpretation
-
-```text
-rumor: timber convoy delayed
-primary question: which account now becomes false or incomplete?
-first action: check ledgers, receipts, payment terms, and reserved storage
-risk focus: hidden obligation, double claim, unpaid balance, false quantity
-confidence source: records, receipts, warehouse notes, payment trail
-```
-
-For Chresimus, the rumor matters because delay creates a gap between written expectation and material arrival.
-
----
-
-## 8. Shared Rumor, Different First Actions
-
-| Actor | First Action |
-|---|---|
-| Varro | confirm physical route failure |
-| Felix | find underpriced substitute stock |
-| Lentulus | identify exposed names and useful introductions |
-| Crispus | locate obligation, witness, or enforceable term |
-| Secundus | map dependent work and replacement capacity |
-| Chresimus | compare rumor against records and reserved claims |
-
-The rumor is the same.
-
-The useful next question differs.
-
----
-
-## 9. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should separate:
-
-| Category | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| shared rumor | same uncertain report heard by all |
-| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
-| actor confidence source | what each actor trusts most |
-| actor first action | how each actor begins reducing uncertainty |
-| actor risk focus | what each actor fears most |
-| possible convergence | when multiple actors' findings can combine |
-
-Actor perspective should not change the rumor.
-
-It should change interpretation and response.
-
----
-
-## 10. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- give all actors the same uncertainty questions
-- make rumor interpretation purely personality flavor
-- assume every actor values the same evidence
-- treat the first confident actor as correct
-- collapse social, logistical, legal, and accounting readings
-- reveal hidden true state to all actors equally
-- ignore that each actor has different access to confirmation
-
----
-
-## 11. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0015-materials-can-change-value-through-use`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0008-material-redirection-timber`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0011-round-trip-cart-value`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0002-conflicting-reports`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0009-same-event-different-knowledge`
-
----
-
-## 12. Success Condition
-
-If the model can present one timber-delay rumor and generate six different but rational first readings without changing the underlying report, this file is functioning correctly.