obsolete
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,174 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# CORPUS-0006
|
|
||||||
## Non-Coin Settlement: Cart Repair
|
|
||||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
|
||||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
|
||||||
### Purpose: Teach that a practical exchange may be settled partly or entirely through goods, labor, future priority, or obligation rather than immediate coin
|
|
||||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0006-non-coin-settlement-cart-repair.md
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 0. Scenario
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A trader in Ostia needs a cart repaired before sending goods toward Capua.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
He does not want to spend much coin before the venture departs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A wheelwright agrees to repair the cart without full immediate coin payment.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The settlement is partly non-coin.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is still an economic exchange.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Fact | Value |
|
|
||||||
|---|---|
|
|
||||||
| Location | Ostia |
|
|
||||||
| Need | cart repair before departure |
|
|
||||||
| Repair value | 8 asses |
|
|
||||||
| Immediate coin paid | 2 asses |
|
|
||||||
| Goods transferred | oil worth 3 asses |
|
|
||||||
| Future obligation | hauling priority after return |
|
|
||||||
| Remaining settlement | relationship/obligation based |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The repair is not free.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The payment is mixed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 2. First Incorrect Calculation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A weak model may calculate:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
|
||||||
coin paid = 2 asses
|
|
||||||
repair cost = 2 asses
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is wrong.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Only 2 asses were paid in coin, but more value changed hands.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The oil and future obligation also matter.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 3. Settlement Structure
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The repair is settled through multiple forms of value:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
|
||||||
coin payment: 2 asses
|
|
||||||
oil transferred: 3 asses
|
|
||||||
future priority: non-coin obligation
|
|
||||||
-----------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
total settlement: mixed value
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The exact coin equivalent of future priority may be uncertain.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
But uncertainty does not mean it has no value.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 4. Why The Wheelwright Accepts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The wheelwright may accept mixed settlement because:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- he needs oil
|
|
||||||
- he trusts the trader
|
|
||||||
- he expects future work
|
|
||||||
- he wants priority access to returned goods
|
|
||||||
- he has no better customer at that moment
|
|
||||||
- he values the relationship
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The agreement depends on trust and expected future benefit.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 5. Why The Trader Accepts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The trader may accept mixed settlement because:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- he preserves coin for the venture
|
|
||||||
- the cart can depart sooner
|
|
||||||
- the repair avoids larger delay cost
|
|
||||||
- the wheelwright becomes a useful contact
|
|
||||||
- the obligation is easier to carry than immediate coin loss
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
But the trader also creates a future burden.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 6. Correct Model Behavior
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The model should record separate effects:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
|
||||||
coin_stock: -2 asses
|
|
||||||
inventory_oil: -3 asses value
|
|
||||||
cart_condition: repaired
|
|
||||||
departure_delay: reduced
|
|
||||||
future_obligation_to_wheelwright: created
|
|
||||||
relationship_with_wheelwright: improved or maintained
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The exchange is not complete merely because little coin changed hands.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 7. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The model should not:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- treat non-coin exchange as free
|
|
||||||
- ignore goods transferred
|
|
||||||
- ignore future obligations
|
|
||||||
- assume all value must be converted immediately into coin
|
|
||||||
- forget that preserving coin may be strategically useful
|
|
||||||
- ignore trust between parties
|
|
||||||
- ignore that the obligation may matter later
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 8. Risk Variants
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Variant A — Successful Return
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The trader returns from Capua and gives the wheelwright priority access to hauling work or goods.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The obligation is satisfied.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Variant B — Failed Venture
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The trader returns without useful goods or cannot honor the priority.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The wheelwright's trust decreases.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Variant C — Disputed Value
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The wheelwright later claims the oil was worth less than agreed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The non-coin settlement creates disagreement.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 9. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This example uses:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0003-money-has-purchasing-power`
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0013-non-coin-settlement-exists`
|
|
||||||
- `CORPUS-0019-success-has-no-boundary-failure-has-a-hard-stop`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 10. Success Condition
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the model sees a repair with little immediate coin payment and still tracks goods, trust, obligations, delay reduction, and future burden, this file is functioning correctly.
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user