diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2454c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
+# CORPUS-0011
+## Same Associate Marriage, Six Readings
+### Status: Training Corpus Seed
+### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
+### Purpose: Teach that the same marriage of a business associate can alter commercial access, obligations, capital, reputation, and future arithmetic differently for each actor profile
+### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
+
+---
+
+## 0. Scenario
+
+A trader in Ostia learns that a business associate in Capua is marrying into another household.
+
+The associate has previously acted as a buyer, messenger, warehouse contact, or source of local information.
+
+The marriage is a household event.
+
+It is also a commercial signal.
+
+All six actors hear the same news.
+
+They do not interpret it the same way.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Shared Marriage Facts
+
+| Fact | Value |
+|---|---|
+| Location affected | Capua |
+| Person affected | business associate |
+| Prior relationship | buyer/contact/informant |
+| Event | marriage into another household |
+| New household resources | unknown |
+| New obligations | likely |
+| Effect on old agreements | uncertain |
+| Effect on future access | uncertain |
+| Public reputation impact | possible |
+
+The marriage does not automatically create profit or loss.
+
+It changes the associate's network, obligations, incentives, and availability.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
+
+Varro reads the marriage through reliability and continuity.
+
+He asks:
+
+- will the associate still be available when needed?
+- has his household duty changed his schedule?
+- will messages still reach him?
+- will he honor prior commitments?
+- has the chain of command changed around him?
+- who now has influence over his decisions?
+
+Varro does not first ask whether the marriage is advantageous.
+
+He asks whether the contact remains dependable.
+
+### Varro Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: reliability may change
+primary question: can this contact still perform his function?
+risk focus: interrupted message flow, changed loyalty, missed timing
+first action: confirm whether prior arrangements still hold
+```
+
+For Varro, the marriage matters because it may weaken a previously reliable node.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
+
+Felix reads the marriage through new pressure and new opportunity.
+
+He asks:
+
+- does the associate need coin for household expenses?
+- does the new household bring stock, debts, or access?
+- are goods being moved, sold, stored, or combined?
+- is anyone discounting assets to settle obligations?
+- does the associate now know new buyers or sellers?
+- can the trader help before rivals notice?
+
+Felix sees marriage as a rearrangement of need and access.
+
+### Felix Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: household pressure and new access may create bargains
+primary question: what changes hands because of the marriage?
+risk focus: overreading household gossip, rival access, hidden obligations
+first action: identify goods, debts, and introductions created by the new tie
+```
+
+For Felix, the marriage matters because household transition can expose mispriced value.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
+
+Lentulus reads the marriage through status, alliance, and social placement.
+
+He asks:
+
+- who is the new family?
+- does the marriage raise or lower the associate's standing?
+- can the trader be introduced through the new tie?
+- should the relationship be cultivated publicly or quietly?
+- does association with this household improve the trader's name?
+- is the marriage beneath notice or socially useful?
+
+Lentulus sees the commercial value in social placement.
+
+### Lentulus Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: social network has changed
+primary question: does the new household improve access or reputation?
+risk focus: wrong association, visible dependence, missed patronage channel
+first action: identify the family rank, connections, and proper form of approach
+```
+
+For Lentulus, the marriage matters because the associate is now attached to another social network.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
+
+Crispus reads the marriage through obligations, property, and claims.
+
+He asks:
+
+- do prior agreements survive the household change?
+- does the associate gain or lose authority to contract?
+- are assets, dowry, debts, or claims involved?
+- does another person now influence payment or performance?
+- should terms be reaffirmed?
+- is a witness needed before the next transaction?
+
+Crispus does not trust old arrangements after a household change unless they are restated.
+
+### Crispus Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: obligations may be altered or contested
+primary question: do prior terms still bind the same person in the same way?
+risk focus: disputed authority, delayed payment, household interference
+first action: reaffirm terms and identify who can now speak for the arrangement
+```
+
+For Crispus, the marriage matters because personal relationships can alter enforceability.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
+
+Secundus reads the marriage through material flow and household provisioning.
+
+He asks:
+
+- will the new household need supplies?
+- are goods being moved between houses?
+- does transport capacity change?
+- does the associate gain storage, animals, tools, or labor?
+- will regular buying patterns change?
+- can return cargo serve household needs?
+
+Secundus sees the household event as a logistics change.
+
+### Secundus Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: household supply and movement pattern may change
+primary question: what goods, storage, labor, or transport are newly required?
+risk focus: wrong quantity, missed delivery timing, changed household demand
+first action: map supply needs, routes, and possible return loads
+```
+
+For Secundus, the marriage matters because households consume, store, move, and reorder goods.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
+
+Chresimus reads the marriage through records, accounts, claims, and authority.
+
+He asks:
+
+- were prior balances settled before marriage?
+- does the associate owe or receive anything through the new household?
+- are goods, debts, or rent claims being transferred?
+- who records the new obligation?
+- is the associate still the correct person to pay?
+- do records need to be updated before further trade?
+
+Chresimus treats the marriage as a possible change in account ownership or responsibility.
+
+### Chresimus Interpretation
+
+```text
+associate marriage: accounts and authority may need revision
+primary question: whose name should now appear on claims, receipts, and payments?
+risk focus: misdirected payment, unrecorded transfer, double claim, stale account
+first action: reconcile old balances and update account names before new business
+```
+
+For Chresimus, the marriage matters because records may lag behind social change.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Same Marriage, Different First Actions
+
+| Actor | First Action |
+|---|---|
+| Varro | confirm reliability and continuity of prior arrangements |
+| Felix | identify new household pressure, goods, and bargains |
+| Lentulus | evaluate family rank and social access |
+| Crispus | reaffirm obligations and authority |
+| Secundus | map changed household supply and movement needs |
+| Chresimus | reconcile accounts and update names, claims, and payments |
+
+The marriage is the same.
+
+The economic meaning differs by actor lens.
+
+---
+
+## 9. Shared Economic Effects
+
+A marriage may affect commerce through:
+
+```text
+access_change
+household_demand_change
+obligation_change
+credit_confidence_change
+storage_or_asset_access_change
+payment_authority_change
+public_reputation_change
+```
+
+None of these effects is automatic.
+
+Each must be confirmed or inferred through evidence.
+
+---
+
+## 10. Correct Model Behavior
+
+The model should separate:
+
+| Category | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| household event | the marriage itself |
+| prior commercial role | what the associate did before |
+| new network | household, family, and access created by marriage |
+| obligations | duties, claims, payments, or expectations altered |
+| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
+| future arithmetic | later prices, costs, credit, or access affected by the change |
+
+The model should recognize that private household events can become commercial conditions.
+
+---
+
+## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
+
+The model should not:
+
+- treat marriage as irrelevant to trade
+- assume marriage automatically improves access
+- assume marriage automatically creates wealth
+- ignore prior obligations
+- ignore changes in authority or payment channel
+- make all actors value the marriage for the same reason
+- treat household gossip as confirmed economic fact
+- expose hidden household truth without a knowledge path
+
+---
+
+## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
+
+This example uses:
+
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0013-non-coin-settlement-exists`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
+- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0012-reputation-loss-changes-future-arithmetic`
+- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
+- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0009-same-event-different-knowledge`
+
+---
+
+## 13. Success Condition
+
+If the model can treat the marriage of a business associate as a possible economic change while producing six distinct rational readings based on reliability, pressure, status, obligation, logistics, and records, this file is functioning correctly.