From 282153eec50a385f28068ea6f88503e1b1fef253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TheRON Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:15:16 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] obsolete --- .../CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md | 118 ------------------ 1 file changed, 118 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md deleted file mode 100644 index f127ceb..0000000 --- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,118 +0,0 @@ -# CORPUS-0011 -## Status Changes Access -### Status: Training Corpus Seed -### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts -### Purpose: Teach that markets, officials, credit, and information are not equally accessible to all actors -### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md - ---- - -## 0. Principle - -Status changes access. - -Two traders may have the same coin, goods, and plan, but receive different treatment. - -Access may depend on: - -- reputation -- family name -- citizenship -- prior service -- occupation -- patronage -- literacy -- witnesses -- public trust -- social prejudice - -The market is not entered equally by every actor. - ---- - -## 1. Roman-Visible Example - -A noble younger son asks to speak with a warehouse official. - -He is received quickly because his family name carries weight. - -A freedman trader asks the same question. - -He may wait longer, be asked for proof, or receive less favorable terms. - -The information may be the same. - -The access is not. - ---- - -## 2. Minimal Access Structure - -Access depends on at least: - -1. actor identity -2. public reputation -3. social rank -4. trusted introductions -5. legal standing -6. prior relationships -7. perceived reliability -8. the gatekeeper's interests - -Access is a relationship, not a universal right. - ---- - -## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption - -Incorrect assumption: - -> Any trader can approach the same person, receive the same answer, and make the same deal. - -Correction: - -> The same request may produce different outcomes depending on who asks, who hears, and what relationship exists between them. - ---- - -## 4. Simulation Use - -This principle supports: - -- auctoritas -- fama -- clientela -- ius_accessus -- queue priority -- credit access -- rumor credibility -- legal enforceability -- background asymmetry - -The model should not treat every actor as having identical access to people, places, or remedies. - ---- - -## 5. Canonical Test - -If the model sees: - -> The trader asks the official for access to warehouse records. - -It must ask: - -- who is the trader? -- what is his reputation? -- does he have an introduction? -- does the official benefit by helping him? -- does his status speed or slow the request? -- is a witness required? -- would another actor receive a different answer? - -Only then can the action be evaluated. - ---- - -## 6. Success Condition - -If the model stops treating access as automatic and starts treating access as shaped by status, reputation, and relationships, this file is functioning correctly.