This commit is contained in:
2026-04-30 15:11:09 -04:00
parent 144cb2b81b
commit 2aa231d7bd

View File

@@ -1,177 +0,0 @@
# CORPUS-0004
## Small Profit Versus Future Access
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
### Purpose: Teach that immediate arithmetic outcome and future strategic value must be tracked separately
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
---
## 0. Scenario
A trader sends oil from Ostia to Capua.
The venture produces only a small coin profit.
However, the buyer pays promptly and invites the trader to supply again.
The immediate arithmetic outcome is small.
The future access may be valuable.
These are related, but they are not the same thing.
---
## 1. Known Final Values
| Item | Value |
|---|---:|
| Sale value in Capua | 18 asses |
| Total cost | 17 asses |
| Final arithmetic outcome | 1 as profit |
The venture earns only 1 as.
By coin arithmetic, the result is small.
---
## 2. Additional Strategic Result
The buyer in Capua is satisfied.
The trader gains:
- a reliable buyer contact
- faster future negotiation
- possible deferred payment trust
- better information about Capua demand
- improved chance of repeat sale
These gains may matter later.
They are not coin profit from the completed venture.
---
## 3. Incorrect Model Behavior
A weak model may say:
> The venture was very profitable because it created a valuable relationship.
This is imprecise.
The correct separation is:
```text
immediate profit = 1 as
strategic value = improved future access
```
The future access may be more important than the 1 as.
But it must be recorded separately.
---
## 4. Correct Model Behavior
The model should record two outcomes:
| Outcome Type | Result |
|---|---|
| arithmetic outcome | 1 as profit |
| strategic outcome | buyer relationship improved |
The model may then reason:
- the immediate venture barely profited
- the trader may repeat the route under better terms
- future credit or information may improve
- the small profit was acceptable because it created access
But the model should not rewrite the arithmetic result.
---
## 5. Variant: Rational Small Loss
The same logic applies if the venture loses a small amount.
| Item | Value |
|---|---:|
| Sale value | 16 asses |
| Total cost | 17 asses |
| Final arithmetic outcome | 1 as loss |
If the buyer relationship becomes valuable, the venture may still have strategic value.
But the immediate account remains:
```text
1 as loss
```
A strategic loss is still a loss.
---
## 6. Why This Matters
If strategic value is merged into profit, the model becomes confused.
It may:
- ignore arithmetic
- call losses profitable
- overvalue vague future benefits
- fail to track coin depletion
- miss hard-stop risk
If strategic value is ignored, the model becomes too narrow.
It may:
- reject useful market-entry ventures
- miss trust-building behavior
- ignore future access
- undervalue repeat buyers
Both errors are harmful.
---
## 7. Correct Accounting Separation
Use separate records:
```text
coin_result: +1 as
relationship_result: buyer_trust_up
information_result: capua_oil_demand_known_better
future_access_result: repeat_sale_possible
```
Do not merge all of these into one number.
---
## 8. Layer-0 Concepts Used
This example uses:
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
- `CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
- `CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
- `CORPUS-0019-success-has-no-boundary-failure-has-a-hard-stop`
- `CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
---
## 9. Success Condition
If the model can say, “This venture made only 1 as, but improved future access,” without confusing the access gain with immediate profit, this file is functioning correctly.