diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f0b884
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+# CORPUS-0006
+## Same Warehouse Right, Six Readings
+### Status: Training Corpus Seed
+### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
+### Purpose: Teach that the same temporary warehouse right is interpreted differently by each actor profile according to timing, speculation, access, enforceability, capacity, and records
+### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
+
+---
+
+## 0. Scenario
+
+A trader in Ostia learns that a temporary warehouse right is available.
+
+The right allows use of a dry corner of a warehouse for ten days.
+
+The trader does not own the warehouse.
+
+He may use the space if he accepts the terms.
+
+All six actors see the same opportunity.
+
+They do not value it the same way.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Shared Warehouse Right Facts
+
+| Fact | Value |
+|---|---|
+| Location | Ostia |
+| Asset type | temporary warehouse use-right |
+| Duration | 10 days |
+| Space condition | dry, guarded, limited corner |
+| Fee | 3 asses |
+| Goods allowed | oil, sealed jars, dry goods |
+| Transferability | uncertain |
+| Enforcement | recognized by warehouse clerk, not yet witnessed |
+| Immediate use | hold goods before sale or dispatch |
+
+The right is not ownership.
+
+It is temporary access to storage capacity.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
+
+Varro reads the warehouse right through order, readiness, and operational control.
+
+He asks:
+
+- can goods be loaded and removed without confusion?
+- who controls the door?
+- is the space secure?
+- can the goods be reached quickly when the cart arrives?
+- are entrances blocked or crowded?
+- does storage reduce or increase delay?
+
+Varro is not interested in storage as passive waiting.
+
+He values it if it improves movement discipline.
+
+### Varro Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: useful staging point
+primary question: does it make departure more reliable?
+risk focus: blocked access, weak guard, confused loading, delayed removal
+first action: inspect access, guard routine, and loading path
+```
+
+For Varro, storage is valuable only if it improves readiness and movement.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
+
+Felix reads the warehouse right through speculation and price timing.
+
+He asks:
+
+- what can be bought cheap and held briefly?
+- who is forced to sell because they lack storage?
+- can goods be hidden from premature repricing?
+- can the space be used to wait out panic?
+- can the right itself be traded or shared?
+- who needs space more urgently than he does?
+
+Felix sees the warehouse right as temporary leverage over timing.
+
+### Felix Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: chance to hold value until price improves
+primary question: what pressure bargain becomes possible because I can store?
+risk focus: fee wasted if price does not move, right challenged, goods tied up
+first action: find goods discounted by storage pressure
+```
+
+For Felix, storage converts another man's urgency into his own option.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
+
+Lentulus reads the warehouse right through access, respectability, and association.
+
+He asks:
+
+- whose warehouse is it?
+- who will see him using it?
+- does the clerk's recognition carry enough standing?
+- can the right connect him to a better household or contractor?
+- does using a small corner look shabby?
+- can the arrangement be framed as an introduction rather than need?
+
+Lentulus may value the right less for storage than for the people attached to it.
+
+### Lentulus Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: socially useful only if attached to worthy access
+primary question: whose name stands behind the space?
+risk focus: visible dependence on minor storage, poor association
+first action: identify owner, clerk, patron, and reputational meaning
+```
+
+For Lentulus, the right matters if it opens a respectable door.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
+
+Crispus reads the warehouse right through recognition, enforceability, and dispute risk.
+
+He asks:
+
+- who grants the right?
+- is the right witnessed?
+- what happens if the clerk changes his mind?
+- does the owner recognize the clerk's authority?
+- who bears loss if goods are damaged?
+- can goods be removed without later claim?
+- are the terms clear enough to rely on?
+
+Crispus does not trust access until the right is defined.
+
+### Crispus Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: useful only if recognized and enforceable
+primary question: who can deny or challenge the right?
+risk focus: unclear authority, disputed storage, damage liability
+first action: secure witness or written term before storing goods
+```
+
+For Crispus, a right without recognition is only permission until challenged.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
+
+Secundus reads the warehouse right through capacity, flow, and staging.
+
+He asks:
+
+- how much can the space hold?
+- can loads be sorted by departure order?
+- does the space reduce handling?
+- can it support round-trip cart planning?
+- can goods be consolidated there?
+- does the storage location match cart access?
+- what goods should not be stored there?
+
+Secundus values the warehouse as a node in a movement chain.
+
+### Secundus Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: staging capacity
+primary question: how does it improve load flow?
+risk focus: wrong goods stored, double handling, poor access, wasted space
+first action: measure usable space and match it to cart schedule
+```
+
+For Secundus, storage is not a room.
+
+It is controlled pause inside a transport system.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
+
+Chresimus reads the warehouse right through records, claim boundaries, and accounting.
+
+He asks:
+
+- is the right recorded?
+- what exact corner is assigned?
+- what goods are listed on entry?
+- who signs or witnesses receipt?
+- is the fee paid or owed?
+- who can prove what was stored?
+- does the right expire before goods are removed?
+
+Chresimus sees the danger in vague access.
+
+He wants the stored goods and the storage right to be countable.
+
+### Chresimus Interpretation
+
+```text
+warehouse right: incomplete until recorded
+primary question: what exactly is stored, where, and under whose claim?
+risk focus: disputed quantity, hidden fee, expired right, confused custody
+first action: record space, duration, goods, fee, and witness
+```
+
+For Chresimus, warehouse space without records becomes future disagreement.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Same Right, Different First Actions
+
+| Actor | First Action |
+|---|---|
+| Varro | inspect access, guards, and loading path |
+| Felix | find goods discounted because others lack storage |
+| Lentulus | identify owner, patron, and reputational meaning |
+| Crispus | secure recognized and enforceable terms |
+| Secundus | map space to load plan and cart schedule |
+| Chresimus | record goods, fee, duration, and custody |
+
+The warehouse right is the same.
+
+Its practical meaning differs by actor lens.
+
+---
+
+## 9. Arithmetic Example
+
+Without warehouse access, the trader must sell immediately:
+
+```text
+purchase value = 20 asses
+immediate sale value = 22 asses
+result = 2 asses profit
+```
+
+With warehouse access:
+
+```text
+purchase value = 20 asses
+warehouse fee = 3 asses
+handling = 2 asses
+later sale value = 30 asses
+result = 5 asses profit
+```
+
+The right creates value only if the later sale appears and the stored goods remain secure.
+
+If later sale fails:
+
+```text
+purchase value = 20 asses
+warehouse fee = 3 asses
+handling = 2 asses
+later sale value = 23 asses
+result = 2 asses loss
+```
+
+The warehouse right creates opportunity and risk together.
+
+---
+
+## 10. Correct Model Behavior
+
+The model should separate:
+
+| Category | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| shared right | temporary warehouse access |
+| ownership | warehouse belongs to someone else |
+| use | trader may store goods temporarily |
+| duration | right expires after a fixed period |
+| actor lens | what each actor values or fears |
+| cost effect | fee and handling added |
+| timing effect | ability to wait for better sale |
+| risk effect | challenge, damage, expiry, or failed price rise |
+
+Actor perspective changes how the right is used, not the fact that it is temporary access rather than ownership.
+
+---
+
+## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
+
+The model should not:
+
+- treat warehouse access as warehouse ownership
+- assume storage is free
+- assume the right is enforceable without recognition
+- ignore duration or expiry
+- ignore handling cost
+- ignore custody and damage risk
+- make all actors value the right for the same reason
+- assume waiting always improves sale price
+
+---
+
+## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
+
+This example uses:
+
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0016-opportunistic-bargains-come-from-pressure`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0021-assets-can-be-productive-or-passive`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
+- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
+- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset`
+- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0012-settlement-reveals-truth`
+
+---
+
+## 13. Success Condition
+
+If the model can keep the warehouse right constant while producing six distinct rational readings based on readiness, speculation, access, enforceability, capacity, and records, this file is functioning correctly.