diff --git a/docs/law/DIALOGUE-LAW-0006.md b/docs/law/DIALOGUE-LAW-0006.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..688add3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/law/DIALOGUE-LAW-0006.md
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
+# DIALOGUE-LAW-0006
+## The Poison and the Cure — Canonical Draft
+### Status: Canonical Dialogue Draft
+### Layer: OTIVM (Roman Law)
+### Purpose: Scenario teaching fraud suspicion, causation uncertainty, recurring demand, lawful versus unlawful inducement, and the legal difficulty of proving coordinated harm for profit.
+### Repository Path: docs/scenarios/DIALOGUE-LAW-0006.md
+
+---
+
+## 0. Design Intent
+
+Rumor spreads through Ostia of a profitable scheme between two cities.
+
+In Capua, a market vendor allegedly sold food and drink that made travelers violently ill. In Ostia, a medicine seller allegedly cured the same symptoms so reliably that merchants joked the road itself carried customers to him.
+
+The signs were memorable: if a man saw double, vomited bile, and begged for water, people directed him to one specific doorway.
+
+No conviction has occurred. No confession exists. No magistrate has ruled.
+
+Yet traders discuss pattern, victims swear certainty, skeptics ask for proof, and sharper minds notice that repeated suffering may create predictable demand even without crime.
+
+Known facts are uncertain:
+
+- whether poisoning truly occurred
+- whether illness came from spoiled food or excess drinking
+- whether the healer colluded or merely capitalized
+- whether symptoms were common knowledge
+- whether witnesses exaggerate after recovery
+- whether lawful enterprise can imitate demand without wrongdoing
+
+The participant must learn that suspicion, proof, and opportunity are different things.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Scene Constraints
+
+Location: tavern courtyard near the baths in Ostia, early evening.
+
+Primary signals:
+
+- merchants telling road stories
+- recovered travelers praising one healer
+- scribes noting names for possible complaints
+- tavern patrons laughing at symptoms
+- vendors wondering what demand can be anticipated lawfully
+- no one possessing decisive proof
+
+Selection method: participant chooses whose interpretation to follow.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Opening Scene Draft
+
+The courtyard smelled of wine, onions, wet stone, and confidence unsupported by evidence.
+
+A circle had formed around two road merchants competing to describe vomiting with superior detail.
+
+Marcus Atilius Varro stood near the cistern where he could hear lies arrive and leave.
+
+Lucius Fabius Felix arrived smiling like a man who loved scandal unless audited.
+
+“No fire. No riot. No tax seizure,” Felix said. “Only testimony after supper.”
+
+Varro nodded toward the storytellers.
+
+“Third retelling.”
+
+“Then facts are nearly polished.”
+
+Gaius Licinius Crispus approached carrying sternness sufficient for several jurisdictions.
+
+“What is alleged?”
+
+Felix answered first.
+
+“That indigestion has geography.”
+
+Crispus ignored him.
+
+“A stall in Capua sells cups and sausages,” Varro said. “Travelers fall sick. In Ostia one healer cures them.”
+
+“Evidence?”
+
+“Memory.”
+
+Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor arrived late enough to ask for summary without admitting interest.
+
+“My cousin swears by the healer.”
+
+Felix nodded.
+
+“Then your cousin has survived either fraud or appetite.”
+
+Titus Varenus Secundus came from the kitchen door carrying a clay mug.
+
+“If they drank heavily on the road,” he said, “they needed water more than miracles.”
+
+Varro asked, “You know the cure?”
+
+“Salt broth, watered vinegar, rest, shade.”
+
+A quiet voice came from beside the table of listeners.
+
+“And being charged before improvement.”
+
+Publius Terentius Chresimus sat with a wax tablet titled Complaints and Opportunities.
+
+Felix sighed.
+
+“Even gossip becomes categories.”
+
+A merchant in travel dust raised his hand dramatically.
+
+“I saw two cups become four! Then the road turned sideways!”
+
+The courtyard applauded the image.
+
+Crispus said, “How much wine?”
+
+The merchant hesitated.
+
+“Some.”
+
+Felix said, “Legal measure: some.”
+
+Lentulus frowned.
+
+“But many independent men report the same symptoms.”
+
+Chresimus nodded.
+
+“Which proves repetition. Not cause.”
+
+A second traveler swore the Capuan vendor always smiled when men purchased the spicy sausages.
+
+Felix spread his hands.
+
+“Arrest all smiling vendors.”
+
+Varro asked, “What does the healer sell exactly?”
+
+Secundus answered first.
+
+“Water, broth, herbs, quiet room.”
+
+Felix blinked.
+
+“That is almost respectable.”
+
+Chresimus added:
+
+“Also priority service, fresh linens, and secrecy.”
+
+Felix smiled slowly.
+
+“There it is.”
+
+A tavern keeper nearby muttered that half his best customers visited the healer every market day.
+
+Crispus said, “Can collusion be proven?”
+
+“No,” Chresimus said. “Only narrated.”
+
+Lentulus asked, “If not criminal, why discuss it?”
+
+Varro answered.
+
+“Because pattern matters.”
+
+Secundus pointed to three men already drunk beside the fountain.
+
+“There.”
+
+“What?” Lentulus asked.
+
+“Tomorrow’s customers.”
+
+The courtyard laughed.
+
+Felix stared at the three men thoughtfully.
+
+“That may be the wisest sentence spoken here.”
+
+A woman selling watered figs said she now kept extra jars on festival mornings because people craved sweetness after drink.
+
+Chresimus wrote that down.
+
+Crispus noticed.
+
+“You are listing lawful responses.”
+
+“I am listing recurring human weakness.”
+
+Felix admired him openly.
+
+“Scholarship advances.”
+
+A retired soldier declared that on campaign the cure for seeing double was seeing less wine.
+
+No one bought his remedy.
+
+Varro asked, “Suppose Capua vendor innocent. Suppose healer merely observant.”
+
+Crispus replied:
+
+“Then accusation harms trade unjustly.”
+
+Felix said, “And still teaches demand.”
+
+Lentulus looked around.
+
+“You mean one need not poison anyone to profit?”
+
+Secundus snorted.
+
+“One need only wait near taverns.”
+
+The courtyard went quiet for a useful moment.
+
+Chresimus said, “Consider after-feast broth stalls.”
+
+Felix said, “Morning water carts outside gaming dens.”
+
+Varro said, “Shade benches outside courts.”
+
+Crispus said, “Queue scribes outside offices.”
+
+Lentulus said, “Fresh garlands outside funerals.”
+
+All five looked at him.
+
+He adjusted himself.
+
+“People grieve decoratively.”
+
+Felix laughed until honest.
+
+A messenger passing through shouted that the Capuan vendor had been beaten, not convicted.
+
+Crispus frowned.
+
+“There. Disorder replacing proof.”
+
+Varro nodded.
+
+“Common.”
+
+Secundus said, “If innocent, next man sells no food there.”
+
+Chresimus added:
+
+“If guilty, next man poisons more carefully.”
+
+The courtyard disliked that sentence because it fit.
+
+Felix asked, “What matters now?”
+
+Varro answered first.
+
+“Can cause be shown.”
+
+Crispus said, “Can complaint be filed properly.”
+
+Lentulus said, “Can reputation be restored once stained.”
+
+Secundus said, “What cure actually works.”
+
+Felix said, “What demand repeats predictably.”
+
+Chresimus said, “Where law permits service before fraud.”
+
+They all looked at him.
+
+“If suffering recurs naturally, sell relief honestly.”
+
+A drunk patron staggered, asked for water, then vomited into a shrub.
+
+Felix pointed.
+
+“There. Market research.”
+
+Varro stepped toward the road merchants.
+
+“I’ll sort witnesses from performers.”
+
+Secundus moved toward the kitchen.
+
+“I’ll price real cures.”
+
+Lentulus adjusted his cloak.
+
+“I will ask discreet houses what they pay for discretion.”
+
+Crispus drew himself up.
+
+“I will examine whether any complaint can stand.”
+
+Felix turned toward the fountain.
+
+“I will inspect tomorrow morning’s customers tonight.”
+
+Chresimus tied his tablet.
+
+“I will list lawful demand hidden inside vice.”
+
+Felix looked back once.
+
+“Six men. One rumor. None of us discussing morality.”
+
+Varro answered without turning.
+
+“We are discussing proof.”
+
+---
+
+## 3. Choice Presentation
+
+> Men are sick, a healer profits, and no one can prove why. Whose reading of the courtyard do you trust?
+
+| Choice | Background |
+|---|---|
+| Follow Varro to separate witnesses, rumor, and fact. | Former Legionary |
+| Follow Felix to identify profitable recurring weakness. | Freedman Trader |
+| Follow Lentulus to gauge elite demand for discreet remedies. | Noble Younger Son |
+| Follow Crispus to test whether accusation can become law. | Failed Magistrate |
+| Follow Secundus to distinguish real treatment from theatre. | Camp Logistician |
+| Follow Chresimus to map lawful demand hidden in predictable suffering. | Guild Scribe |
+
+---
+
+## 4. What This Scene Teaches
+
+- Repeated stories do not automatically prove causation.
+- Fraud suspicion and proof are different things.
+- Some profitable demand is naturally recurring.
+- Reputation can be destroyed before judgment.
+- Law struggles when harm is diffuse and evidence weak.
+- Honest services can emerge from common vice.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Canonical Success Condition
+
+If the participant stops asking:
+
+“Was it a conspiracy?”
+
+and starts asking:
+
+“What suffering repeats predictably without crime?”
+
+then this dialogue is functioning correctly.