obsolete
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0012
|
||||
## Every Venture Risks Loss
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that every commercial action can fail through price change, delay, damage, bad information, or unmet obligations
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Principle
|
||||
|
||||
Every venture risks loss.
|
||||
|
||||
A trader may plan well and still lose value.
|
||||
|
||||
Loss can come from:
|
||||
|
||||
- price changes
|
||||
- delay
|
||||
- spoilage
|
||||
- breakage
|
||||
- theft
|
||||
- bad information
|
||||
- failed credit
|
||||
- blocked access
|
||||
- higher-than-expected costs
|
||||
- buyer refusal
|
||||
- route disruption
|
||||
|
||||
A venture is not safe because it looks profitable at the start.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Roman-Visible Example
|
||||
|
||||
A trader buys oil in Ostia to sell in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The expected sale price is good.
|
||||
|
||||
But before sale:
|
||||
|
||||
- the cart is delayed
|
||||
- one amphora leaks
|
||||
- another trader arrives first
|
||||
- Capua buyers lower their offers
|
||||
- storage costs rise
|
||||
- the buyer who promised purchase cannot pay
|
||||
|
||||
The trader did not make a foolish plan.
|
||||
|
||||
The venture still risks loss because the world changed before settlement.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Minimal Risk Structure
|
||||
|
||||
A venture has risk wherever something can change between decision and result.
|
||||
|
||||
At minimum, risk depends on:
|
||||
|
||||
1. time in motion
|
||||
2. route reliability
|
||||
3. price uncertainty
|
||||
4. information quality
|
||||
5. storage quality
|
||||
6. buyer reliability
|
||||
7. cost uncertainty
|
||||
8. actor access and reputation
|
||||
|
||||
No venture is complete until settlement occurs.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
|
||||
|
||||
Incorrect assumption:
|
||||
|
||||
> If the planned sale price is higher than the purchase price, the venture is safe.
|
||||
|
||||
Correction:
|
||||
|
||||
> A venture is only safe after costs are paid, goods or claims are settled, and obligations are fulfilled.
|
||||
|
||||
Expected profit is not actual profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Simulation Use
|
||||
|
||||
This principle supports:
|
||||
|
||||
- venture risk
|
||||
- loss events
|
||||
- delayed settlement
|
||||
- price movement
|
||||
- damaged goods
|
||||
- unreliable buyers
|
||||
- insurance-like behavior where historically appropriate
|
||||
- diversification
|
||||
- cautious versus aggressive actors
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not treat a venture as guaranteed because its starting arithmetic is favorable.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Canonical Test
|
||||
|
||||
If the model sees:
|
||||
|
||||
> The trader expects to earn 5 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
It must ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- what can go wrong before settlement?
|
||||
- how reliable is the route?
|
||||
- how certain is the destination price?
|
||||
- can the buyer pay?
|
||||
- can costs increase?
|
||||
- can goods be damaged?
|
||||
- is the information current?
|
||||
- when does expected profit become actual profit?
|
||||
|
||||
Only then can the venture be evaluated.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model stops treating expected profit as guaranteed and starts treating every venture as exposed to change before settlement, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user