diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
deleted file mode 100644
index c2454c3..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,306 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0011
-## Same Associate Marriage, Six Readings
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
-### Purpose: Teach that the same marriage of a business associate can alter commercial access, obligations, capital, reputation, and future arithmetic differently for each actor profile
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0011-same-associate-marriage-six-readings.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia learns that a business associate in Capua is marrying into another household.
-
-The associate has previously acted as a buyer, messenger, warehouse contact, or source of local information.
-
-The marriage is a household event.
-
-It is also a commercial signal.
-
-All six actors hear the same news.
-
-They do not interpret it the same way.
-
----
-
-## 1. Shared Marriage Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---|
-| Location affected | Capua |
-| Person affected | business associate |
-| Prior relationship | buyer/contact/informant |
-| Event | marriage into another household |
-| New household resources | unknown |
-| New obligations | likely |
-| Effect on old agreements | uncertain |
-| Effect on future access | uncertain |
-| Public reputation impact | possible |
-
-The marriage does not automatically create profit or loss.
-
-It changes the associate's network, obligations, incentives, and availability.
-
----
-
-## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
-
-Varro reads the marriage through reliability and continuity.
-
-He asks:
-
-- will the associate still be available when needed?
-- has his household duty changed his schedule?
-- will messages still reach him?
-- will he honor prior commitments?
-- has the chain of command changed around him?
-- who now has influence over his decisions?
-
-Varro does not first ask whether the marriage is advantageous.
-
-He asks whether the contact remains dependable.
-
-### Varro Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: reliability may change
-primary question: can this contact still perform his function?
-risk focus: interrupted message flow, changed loyalty, missed timing
-first action: confirm whether prior arrangements still hold
-```
-
-For Varro, the marriage matters because it may weaken a previously reliable node.
-
----
-
-## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
-
-Felix reads the marriage through new pressure and new opportunity.
-
-He asks:
-
-- does the associate need coin for household expenses?
-- does the new household bring stock, debts, or access?
-- are goods being moved, sold, stored, or combined?
-- is anyone discounting assets to settle obligations?
-- does the associate now know new buyers or sellers?
-- can the trader help before rivals notice?
-
-Felix sees marriage as a rearrangement of need and access.
-
-### Felix Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: household pressure and new access may create bargains
-primary question: what changes hands because of the marriage?
-risk focus: overreading household gossip, rival access, hidden obligations
-first action: identify goods, debts, and introductions created by the new tie
-```
-
-For Felix, the marriage matters because household transition can expose mispriced value.
-
----
-
-## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
-
-Lentulus reads the marriage through status, alliance, and social placement.
-
-He asks:
-
-- who is the new family?
-- does the marriage raise or lower the associate's standing?
-- can the trader be introduced through the new tie?
-- should the relationship be cultivated publicly or quietly?
-- does association with this household improve the trader's name?
-- is the marriage beneath notice or socially useful?
-
-Lentulus sees the commercial value in social placement.
-
-### Lentulus Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: social network has changed
-primary question: does the new household improve access or reputation?
-risk focus: wrong association, visible dependence, missed patronage channel
-first action: identify the family rank, connections, and proper form of approach
-```
-
-For Lentulus, the marriage matters because the associate is now attached to another social network.
-
----
-
-## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
-
-Crispus reads the marriage through obligations, property, and claims.
-
-He asks:
-
-- do prior agreements survive the household change?
-- does the associate gain or lose authority to contract?
-- are assets, dowry, debts, or claims involved?
-- does another person now influence payment or performance?
-- should terms be reaffirmed?
-- is a witness needed before the next transaction?
-
-Crispus does not trust old arrangements after a household change unless they are restated.
-
-### Crispus Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: obligations may be altered or contested
-primary question: do prior terms still bind the same person in the same way?
-risk focus: disputed authority, delayed payment, household interference
-first action: reaffirm terms and identify who can now speak for the arrangement
-```
-
-For Crispus, the marriage matters because personal relationships can alter enforceability.
-
----
-
-## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
-
-Secundus reads the marriage through material flow and household provisioning.
-
-He asks:
-
-- will the new household need supplies?
-- are goods being moved between houses?
-- does transport capacity change?
-- does the associate gain storage, animals, tools, or labor?
-- will regular buying patterns change?
-- can return cargo serve household needs?
-
-Secundus sees the household event as a logistics change.
-
-### Secundus Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: household supply and movement pattern may change
-primary question: what goods, storage, labor, or transport are newly required?
-risk focus: wrong quantity, missed delivery timing, changed household demand
-first action: map supply needs, routes, and possible return loads
-```
-
-For Secundus, the marriage matters because households consume, store, move, and reorder goods.
-
----
-
-## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
-
-Chresimus reads the marriage through records, accounts, claims, and authority.
-
-He asks:
-
-- were prior balances settled before marriage?
-- does the associate owe or receive anything through the new household?
-- are goods, debts, or rent claims being transferred?
-- who records the new obligation?
-- is the associate still the correct person to pay?
-- do records need to be updated before further trade?
-
-Chresimus treats the marriage as a possible change in account ownership or responsibility.
-
-### Chresimus Interpretation
-
-```text
-associate marriage: accounts and authority may need revision
-primary question: whose name should now appear on claims, receipts, and payments?
-risk focus: misdirected payment, unrecorded transfer, double claim, stale account
-first action: reconcile old balances and update account names before new business
-```
-
-For Chresimus, the marriage matters because records may lag behind social change.
-
----
-
-## 8. Same Marriage, Different First Actions
-
-| Actor | First Action |
-|---|---|
-| Varro | confirm reliability and continuity of prior arrangements |
-| Felix | identify new household pressure, goods, and bargains |
-| Lentulus | evaluate family rank and social access |
-| Crispus | reaffirm obligations and authority |
-| Secundus | map changed household supply and movement needs |
-| Chresimus | reconcile accounts and update names, claims, and payments |
-
-The marriage is the same.
-
-The economic meaning differs by actor lens.
-
----
-
-## 9. Shared Economic Effects
-
-A marriage may affect commerce through:
-
-```text
-access_change
-household_demand_change
-obligation_change
-credit_confidence_change
-storage_or_asset_access_change
-payment_authority_change
-public_reputation_change
-```
-
-None of these effects is automatic.
-
-Each must be confirmed or inferred through evidence.
-
----
-
-## 10. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should separate:
-
-| Category | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| household event | the marriage itself |
-| prior commercial role | what the associate did before |
-| new network | household, family, and access created by marriage |
-| obligations | duties, claims, payments, or expectations altered |
-| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
-| future arithmetic | later prices, costs, credit, or access affected by the change |
-
-The model should recognize that private household events can become commercial conditions.
-
----
-
-## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- treat marriage as irrelevant to trade
-- assume marriage automatically improves access
-- assume marriage automatically creates wealth
-- ignore prior obligations
-- ignore changes in authority or payment channel
-- make all actors value the marriage for the same reason
-- treat household gossip as confirmed economic fact
-- expose hidden household truth without a knowledge path
-
----
-
-## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0013-non-coin-settlement-exists`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0012-reputation-loss-changes-future-arithmetic`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0009-same-event-different-knowledge`
-
----
-
-## 13. Success Condition
-
-If the model can treat the marriage of a business associate as a possible economic change while producing six distinct rational readings based on reliability, pressure, status, obligation, logistics, and records, this file is functioning correctly.