diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 4247134..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,225 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0015
-## Warehouse Space As Asset
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
-### Purpose: Teach that storage capacity can function as an asset, access right, cost reducer, timing tool, and collateral support
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia has access to warehouse space.
-
-He does not own the warehouse.
-
-He holds a recognized right to store goods in one section for a limited time.
-
-This storage access changes what ventures he can attempt.
-
-Warehouse space is not only a place where goods wait.
-
-It can affect price, timing, spoilage, bargaining power, credit, and risk.
-
----
-
-## 1. Basic Situation
-
-The trader buys oil in Ostia.
-
-He can either:
-
-1. sell quickly at a lower price, because he has nowhere to hold the oil
-2. store the oil safely and wait for a better buyer
-3. consolidate the oil with other goods for a larger shipment
-4. use stored goods as evidence of capacity when seeking credit
-
-The same oil has different economic possibilities depending on storage access.
-
----
-
-## 2. Known Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---:|
-| Good | oil |
-| Purchase value | 20 asses |
-| Immediate local resale value | 22 asses |
-| Expected future sale value | 30 asses |
-| Warehouse access duration | 10 days |
-| Storage fee | 3 asses |
-| Handling cost | 2 asses |
-| Spoilage/leakage risk | low if stored properly |
-
----
-
-## 3. Immediate Sale Calculation
-
-If the trader sells immediately:
-
-```text
-sale value = 22 asses
-purchase value = 20 asses
-result = 2 asses profit
-```
-
-The sale is simple.
-
-But the trader may be giving up a better timed sale because he lacks or ignores storage value.
-
----
-
-## 4. Storage-And-Wait Calculation
-
-If the trader stores the oil and sells later:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 20 asses
-storage fee = 3 asses
-handling cost = 2 asses
-total cost = 25 asses
-future sale value = 30 asses
-result = 5 asses profit
-```
-
-Storage added cost.
-
-But it also allowed the trader to wait for a better sale.
-
-The warehouse space produced value by preserving timing flexibility.
-
----
-
-## 5. When Storage Is A Bad Asset
-
-Storage is not always beneficial.
-
-If the expected future sale does not appear:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 20 asses
-storage fee = 3 asses
-handling cost = 2 asses
-final sale value = 23 asses
-result = 2 asses loss
-```
-
-The trader would have been better selling immediately.
-
-Storage increases flexibility but also adds cost and delay.
-
----
-
-## 6. Access Right Versus Ownership
-
-The trader does not need to own the warehouse.
-
-He may have:
-
-- temporary storage permission
-- rented space
-- priority access through relationship
-- a corner of a larger warehouse
-- storage granted as part of another bargain
-- space controlled through a partner or patron
-
-Each arrangement has different security and enforceability.
-
-The model must distinguish warehouse ownership from warehouse access.
-
----
-
-## 7. Warehouse Space As Credit Support
-
-Stored goods may support credit.
-
-A seller or lender may extend trust because goods are visible, held, and countable.
-
-Example:
-
-```text
-stored oil value = 20 asses
-credit extended = 12 asses
-```
-
-The warehouse space does not create coin directly.
-
-It helps make the stored goods credible as backing for future settlement.
-
----
-
-## 8. Warehouse Space As Bargaining Tool
-
-A trader with storage can wait.
-
-A trader without storage may be forced to sell quickly.
-
-This changes bargaining power.
-
-| Condition | Effect |
-|---|---|
-| no storage | seller may accept low price |
-| secure storage | seller can wait |
-| scarce storage | storage fee rises |
-| wet or unsafe storage | spoilage risk rises |
-| recognized storage right | goods are more credible |
-
-Storage changes time pressure.
-
-Time pressure changes price.
-
----
-
-## 9. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should ask:
-
-- who owns the warehouse?
-- who controls access?
-- how long may the trader store goods?
-- what fee or obligation is attached?
-- are the goods protected from damage?
-- can the stored goods support credit?
-- does storage reduce distress selling?
-- does storage delay create better price or extra cost?
-- can access be withdrawn or challenged?
-
-Warehouse space is an economic position, not only a location.
-
----
-
-## 10. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- treat storage as free
-- treat warehouse access as ownership
-- ignore storage duration
-- ignore handling cost
-- ignore spoilage or leakage risk
-- ignore the ability to wait
-- ignore storage as credit support
-- assume every trader has equal storage access
-- ignore loss if future price fails to rise
-
----
-
-## 11. Layer-0 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0021-assets-can-be-productive-or-passive`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
-
----
-
-## 12. Success Condition
-
-If the model sees warehouse space and asks how it changes timing, storage cost, bargaining power, risk, access, and credit support before calculating the venture, this file is functioning correctly.