obsolete
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0023
|
||||
## Ownership, Use, And Income Can Separate
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that owning an asset, using it, controlling it, earning from it, and claiming against it may belong to different actors
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Principle
|
||||
|
||||
Ownership, use, income, custody, and claim are not always held by the same person.
|
||||
|
||||
One actor may own an asset.
|
||||
|
||||
Another may use it.
|
||||
|
||||
Another may collect income from it.
|
||||
|
||||
Another may hold a claim against it.
|
||||
|
||||
Another may control access to it in practice.
|
||||
|
||||
The model must not assume that possession, ownership, and economic benefit are the same condition.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Roman-Visible Example
|
||||
|
||||
A building in Ostia may involve several different economic positions:
|
||||
|
||||
- one family owns the building
|
||||
- a shopkeeper rents the front room
|
||||
- a warehouse clerk controls access to stored goods
|
||||
- tenants pay rent for upper rooms
|
||||
- a creditor holds a claim against future rent
|
||||
- a trader has temporary storage permission in one corner
|
||||
|
||||
The building is one asset.
|
||||
|
||||
The economic rights around it are several.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Minimal Separation Structure
|
||||
|
||||
For any asset, the model should ask:
|
||||
|
||||
1. who owns it?
|
||||
2. who possesses or occupies it?
|
||||
3. who may use it?
|
||||
4. who collects income from it?
|
||||
5. who pays upkeep?
|
||||
6. who controls access?
|
||||
7. who bears risk of damage?
|
||||
8. who has a claim against it?
|
||||
9. who can transfer or restrict use?
|
||||
10. who recognizes these arrangements?
|
||||
|
||||
A single asset can support multiple relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
|
||||
|
||||
Incorrect assumption:
|
||||
|
||||
> The person using an asset owns it and receives all value from it.
|
||||
|
||||
Correction:
|
||||
|
||||
> The user of an asset may be a renter, custodian, borrower, tenant, agent, or temporary right-holder.
|
||||
|
||||
Likewise, the owner may not directly use the asset or receive immediate coin from it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Simulation Use
|
||||
|
||||
This principle supports:
|
||||
|
||||
- rental income
|
||||
- tenancy
|
||||
- warehouse custody
|
||||
- storage rights
|
||||
- building ownership
|
||||
- land use
|
||||
- cart hire
|
||||
- ship shares
|
||||
- debt claims
|
||||
- collateral
|
||||
- agency relationships
|
||||
- maintenance obligations
|
||||
- disputes over title, use, or income
|
||||
|
||||
The model should represent asset relationships as separable claims and roles, not as a single ownership flag.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Canonical Test
|
||||
|
||||
If the model sees:
|
||||
|
||||
> The trader uses warehouse space.
|
||||
|
||||
It must ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- does he own the warehouse?
|
||||
- is he renting the space?
|
||||
- is it temporary use?
|
||||
- who controls access?
|
||||
- who earns from the arrangement?
|
||||
- who bears damage risk?
|
||||
- who can remove him?
|
||||
- is there a creditor or prior claimant?
|
||||
- is the right recorded, witnessed, or informal?
|
||||
|
||||
Only then can the economic position be understood.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model stops collapsing ownership, use, income, custody, and claim into one state and starts tracking them as separable economic relationships, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user