diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 7f0b884..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,330 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0006
-## Same Warehouse Right, Six Readings
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
-### Purpose: Teach that the same temporary warehouse right is interpreted differently by each actor profile according to timing, speculation, access, enforceability, capacity, and records
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0006-same-warehouse-right-six-readings.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia learns that a temporary warehouse right is available.
-
-The right allows use of a dry corner of a warehouse for ten days.
-
-The trader does not own the warehouse.
-
-He may use the space if he accepts the terms.
-
-All six actors see the same opportunity.
-
-They do not value it the same way.
-
----
-
-## 1. Shared Warehouse Right Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---|
-| Location | Ostia |
-| Asset type | temporary warehouse use-right |
-| Duration | 10 days |
-| Space condition | dry, guarded, limited corner |
-| Fee | 3 asses |
-| Goods allowed | oil, sealed jars, dry goods |
-| Transferability | uncertain |
-| Enforcement | recognized by warehouse clerk, not yet witnessed |
-| Immediate use | hold goods before sale or dispatch |
-
-The right is not ownership.
-
-It is temporary access to storage capacity.
-
----
-
-## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
-
-Varro reads the warehouse right through order, readiness, and operational control.
-
-He asks:
-
-- can goods be loaded and removed without confusion?
-- who controls the door?
-- is the space secure?
-- can the goods be reached quickly when the cart arrives?
-- are entrances blocked or crowded?
-- does storage reduce or increase delay?
-
-Varro is not interested in storage as passive waiting.
-
-He values it if it improves movement discipline.
-
-### Varro Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: useful staging point
-primary question: does it make departure more reliable?
-risk focus: blocked access, weak guard, confused loading, delayed removal
-first action: inspect access, guard routine, and loading path
-```
-
-For Varro, storage is valuable only if it improves readiness and movement.
-
----
-
-## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
-
-Felix reads the warehouse right through speculation and price timing.
-
-He asks:
-
-- what can be bought cheap and held briefly?
-- who is forced to sell because they lack storage?
-- can goods be hidden from premature repricing?
-- can the space be used to wait out panic?
-- can the right itself be traded or shared?
-- who needs space more urgently than he does?
-
-Felix sees the warehouse right as temporary leverage over timing.
-
-### Felix Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: chance to hold value until price improves
-primary question: what pressure bargain becomes possible because I can store?
-risk focus: fee wasted if price does not move, right challenged, goods tied up
-first action: find goods discounted by storage pressure
-```
-
-For Felix, storage converts another man's urgency into his own option.
-
----
-
-## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
-
-Lentulus reads the warehouse right through access, respectability, and association.
-
-He asks:
-
-- whose warehouse is it?
-- who will see him using it?
-- does the clerk's recognition carry enough standing?
-- can the right connect him to a better household or contractor?
-- does using a small corner look shabby?
-- can the arrangement be framed as an introduction rather than need?
-
-Lentulus may value the right less for storage than for the people attached to it.
-
-### Lentulus Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: socially useful only if attached to worthy access
-primary question: whose name stands behind the space?
-risk focus: visible dependence on minor storage, poor association
-first action: identify owner, clerk, patron, and reputational meaning
-```
-
-For Lentulus, the right matters if it opens a respectable door.
-
----
-
-## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
-
-Crispus reads the warehouse right through recognition, enforceability, and dispute risk.
-
-He asks:
-
-- who grants the right?
-- is the right witnessed?
-- what happens if the clerk changes his mind?
-- does the owner recognize the clerk's authority?
-- who bears loss if goods are damaged?
-- can goods be removed without later claim?
-- are the terms clear enough to rely on?
-
-Crispus does not trust access until the right is defined.
-
-### Crispus Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: useful only if recognized and enforceable
-primary question: who can deny or challenge the right?
-risk focus: unclear authority, disputed storage, damage liability
-first action: secure witness or written term before storing goods
-```
-
-For Crispus, a right without recognition is only permission until challenged.
-
----
-
-## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
-
-Secundus reads the warehouse right through capacity, flow, and staging.
-
-He asks:
-
-- how much can the space hold?
-- can loads be sorted by departure order?
-- does the space reduce handling?
-- can it support round-trip cart planning?
-- can goods be consolidated there?
-- does the storage location match cart access?
-- what goods should not be stored there?
-
-Secundus values the warehouse as a node in a movement chain.
-
-### Secundus Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: staging capacity
-primary question: how does it improve load flow?
-risk focus: wrong goods stored, double handling, poor access, wasted space
-first action: measure usable space and match it to cart schedule
-```
-
-For Secundus, storage is not a room.
-
-It is controlled pause inside a transport system.
-
----
-
-## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
-
-Chresimus reads the warehouse right through records, claim boundaries, and accounting.
-
-He asks:
-
-- is the right recorded?
-- what exact corner is assigned?
-- what goods are listed on entry?
-- who signs or witnesses receipt?
-- is the fee paid or owed?
-- who can prove what was stored?
-- does the right expire before goods are removed?
-
-Chresimus sees the danger in vague access.
-
-He wants the stored goods and the storage right to be countable.
-
-### Chresimus Interpretation
-
-```text
-warehouse right: incomplete until recorded
-primary question: what exactly is stored, where, and under whose claim?
-risk focus: disputed quantity, hidden fee, expired right, confused custody
-first action: record space, duration, goods, fee, and witness
-```
-
-For Chresimus, warehouse space without records becomes future disagreement.
-
----
-
-## 8. Same Right, Different First Actions
-
-| Actor | First Action |
-|---|---|
-| Varro | inspect access, guards, and loading path |
-| Felix | find goods discounted because others lack storage |
-| Lentulus | identify owner, patron, and reputational meaning |
-| Crispus | secure recognized and enforceable terms |
-| Secundus | map space to load plan and cart schedule |
-| Chresimus | record goods, fee, duration, and custody |
-
-The warehouse right is the same.
-
-Its practical meaning differs by actor lens.
-
----
-
-## 9. Arithmetic Example
-
-Without warehouse access, the trader must sell immediately:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 20 asses
-immediate sale value = 22 asses
-result = 2 asses profit
-```
-
-With warehouse access:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 20 asses
-warehouse fee = 3 asses
-handling = 2 asses
-later sale value = 30 asses
-result = 5 asses profit
-```
-
-The right creates value only if the later sale appears and the stored goods remain secure.
-
-If later sale fails:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 20 asses
-warehouse fee = 3 asses
-handling = 2 asses
-later sale value = 23 asses
-result = 2 asses loss
-```
-
-The warehouse right creates opportunity and risk together.
-
----
-
-## 10. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should separate:
-
-| Category | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| shared right | temporary warehouse access |
-| ownership | warehouse belongs to someone else |
-| use | trader may store goods temporarily |
-| duration | right expires after a fixed period |
-| actor lens | what each actor values or fears |
-| cost effect | fee and handling added |
-| timing effect | ability to wait for better sale |
-| risk effect | challenge, damage, expiry, or failed price rise |
-
-Actor perspective changes how the right is used, not the fact that it is temporary access rather than ownership.
-
----
-
-## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- treat warehouse access as warehouse ownership
-- assume storage is free
-- assume the right is enforceable without recognition
-- ignore duration or expiry
-- ignore handling cost
-- ignore custody and damage risk
-- make all actors value the right for the same reason
-- assume waiting always improves sale price
-
----
-
-## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0016-opportunistic-bargains-come-from-pressure`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0021-assets-can-be-productive-or-passive`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0012-settlement-reveals-truth`
-
----
-
-## 13. Success Condition
-
-If the model can keep the warehouse right constant while producing six distinct rational readings based on readiness, speculation, access, enforceability, capacity, and records, this file is functioning correctly.