diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0009-same-material-redirection-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0009-same-material-redirection-six-readings.md
deleted file mode 100644
index d8f51e7..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0009-same-material-redirection-six-readings.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,337 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0009
-## Same Material Redirection, Six Readings
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
-### Purpose: Teach that the same possible redirection of a material into a higher-value use is interpreted differently by each actor profile according to execution, mispricing, access, enforceability, capacity, and verification
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0009-same-material-redirection-six-readings.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia learns that dry construction timber may be redirected to a higher-value use in Capua.
-
-The timber was originally intended for ordinary building work.
-
-A new report says cart repair shops in Capua need straight dry boards.
-
-All six actors see the same possible redirection.
-
-They do not interpret it the same way.
-
----
-
-## 1. Shared Material Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---|
-| Current location | Ostia |
-| Material | timber |
-| Original intended use | ordinary construction |
-| Possible higher-value use | cart repair stock in Capua |
-| Local purchase value | 30 asses |
-| Movement and handling cost | 10 asses |
-| Expected Capua repair-use sale value | 48 asses |
-| Quality | reported dry and straight, not fully verified |
-| Rival interest | possible |
-| True suitability | unknown |
-
-Expected arithmetic if suitable:
-
-```text
-sale value = 48 asses
-total cost = 30 + 10 = 40 asses
-expected profit = 8 asses
-```
-
-The expected profit depends on suitability.
-
-If the timber cannot serve the new use, the redirection may fail.
-
----
-
-## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
-
-Varro reads the redirection through execution and transport reliability.
-
-He asks:
-
-- can the timber be loaded without delay?
-- is the cart suitable for the boards?
-- will the load slow the route?
-- can the cargo be protected from damage?
-- is the destination workshop ready to receive it?
-- what happens if the timber is longer or heavier than expected?
-
-Varro does not first ask whether timber can be valuable.
-
-He asks whether the movement can be executed cleanly.
-
-### Varro Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: possible only if movement and handling are controlled
-primary question: can the boards reach Capua usable and on time?
-risk focus: loading delay, broken boards, poor cart, missed delivery window
-first action: inspect load size, cart capacity, and receiving point
-```
-
-For Varro, higher value is irrelevant if execution damages or delays the material.
-
----
-
-## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
-
-Felix reads the redirection through mispricing and seller ignorance.
-
-He asks:
-
-- does the seller still price the timber as ordinary construction stock?
-- who else knows the Capua repair demand?
-- can the timber be bought before repricing?
-- can partial stock be split and resold differently?
-- can the seller be pressured by storage needs?
-- is the rumor enough to justify fast action?
-
-Felix sees the opportunity in the gap between current use and possible use.
-
-### Felix Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: price gap between what seller sees and what buyer needs
-primary question: who has not yet understood the higher-value use?
-risk focus: rumor false, seller reprices, rival buys first, hidden defects
-first action: secure option or buy before the use-value becomes public
-```
-
-For Felix, the timber is valuable because someone still sees it as less than it may become.
-
----
-
-## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
-
-Lentulus reads the redirection through access to the buyer and respectable positioning.
-
-He asks:
-
-- which Capua workshop needs the boards?
-- who owns or sponsors the repair work?
-- can supplying the timber create introduction?
-- does the redirection look clever or merely opportunistic?
-- is the buyer socially useful?
-- can the sale be framed as assistance rather than trade?
-
-Lentulus values the material if it brings him into a better network.
-
-### Lentulus Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: useful if attached to a worthy buyer or patron
-primary question: whose need does this satisfy?
-risk focus: low-status transaction, poor association, visible overreach
-first action: identify buyer name, workshop connection, and social value
-```
-
-For Lentulus, the timber matters less than whose work it enables.
-
----
-
-## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
-
-Crispus reads the redirection through claims, terms, and enforceability.
-
-He asks:
-
-- is the timber free to sell?
-- was it already promised for construction?
-- can the original buyer object?
-- are there deposits or claims attached?
-- who bears risk if the timber proves unsuitable?
-- are sale terms tied to repair-grade quality?
-- what remedy exists if the buyer disputes suitability?
-
-Crispus sees danger in redirecting material from one expected use to another without clear terms.
-
-### Crispus Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: higher-value use may create claim and dispute risk
-primary question: who has a prior claim, and who bears suitability risk?
-risk focus: disputed title, broken prior promise, buyer rejection, weak witness
-first action: verify ownership, prior commitments, and sale terms
-```
-
-For Crispus, redirection is profitable only if the claim structure is clean.
-
----
-
-## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
-
-Secundus reads the redirection through suitability, quantity, and substitution.
-
-He asks:
-
-- are the boards truly dry?
-- are they straight enough for cart repair?
-- how many usable pieces can be cut?
-- what is lost in shaping?
-- what substitute materials exist?
-- what work stops if repair stock is unavailable?
-- does transport capacity match length and weight?
-
-Secundus does not treat timber as generic.
-
-He maps material quality to actual use.
-
-### Secundus Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: useful only if material fits the function
-primary question: how much of the timber becomes usable repair stock?
-risk focus: wrong dimensions, green wood, waste in cutting, bulky transport
-first action: inspect quality, dimensions, and expected usable yield
-```
-
-For Secundus, possible use must become practical suitability before value exists.
-
----
-
-## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
-
-Chresimus reads the redirection through records, quality description, and accounting exposure.
-
-He asks:
-
-- how was the timber described in the purchase record?
-- is quality recorded or merely claimed?
-- what quantity is usable?
-- does the account distinguish construction value from repair-use value?
-- is any portion damaged or unsuitable?
-- are deposits, delivery terms, and rejection terms recorded?
-- does the expected margin survive if quality is discounted?
-
-Chresimus does not trust a higher-value category until the account can prove what was bought and what was sold.
-
-### Chresimus Interpretation
-
-```text
-material redirection: margin depends on recorded quality and usable quantity
-primary question: can the account prove the timber fits the higher-value use?
-risk focus: inflated quantity, vague quality, hidden discount, disputed sale
-first action: record dimensions, quality, quantity, and terms of acceptance
-```
-
-For Chresimus, unrecorded suitability becomes future dispute.
-
----
-
-## 8. Same Redirection, Different First Actions
-
-| Actor | First Action |
-|---|---|
-| Varro | inspect loading, route, cart fit, and receiving point |
-| Felix | secure underpriced timber before repricing |
-| Lentulus | identify buyer name and social value |
-| Crispus | verify ownership, prior claims, and sale terms |
-| Secundus | inspect dimensions, dryness, and usable yield |
-| Chresimus | record quality, quantity, and acceptance terms |
-
-The timber is the same.
-
-The higher-value possibility is the same.
-
-The first useful question differs.
-
----
-
-## 9. Shared Arithmetic Frame
-
-If the timber is suitable:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 30 asses
-movement and handling = 10 asses
-sale value = 48 asses
-result = 8 asses profit
-```
-
-If extra shaping is required:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 30 asses
-movement and handling = 10 asses
-shaping cost = 6 asses
-sale value = 48 asses
-result = 2 asses profit
-```
-
-If the timber is unsuitable and sells only as ordinary stock:
-
-```text
-purchase value = 30 asses
-movement and handling = 10 asses
-sale value = 34 asses
-result = 6 asses loss
-```
-
-The material's possible use creates the opportunity.
-
-The material's actual suitability resolves the outcome.
-
----
-
-## 10. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should separate:
-
-| Category | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| material identity | timber |
-| original intended use | construction |
-| possible higher-value use | cart repair stock |
-| actual suitability | hidden or unverified until inspected |
-| transformation cost | shaping, cutting, sorting, handling |
-| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
-| final arithmetic | outcome after suitability, cost, and sale resolve |
-
-Actor perspective changes which uncertainty is attacked first.
-
-It does not guarantee the higher-value use.
-
----
-
-## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- assume all timber fits all uses
-- treat possible higher value as confirmed sale value
-- ignore prior claims on the material
-- ignore transport and shaping cost
-- ignore quality verification
-- make all actors ask the same questions
-- let actor optimism change material suitability
-- collapse material identity and material function into one value
-
----
-
-## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0002-goods-have-local-prices`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0015-materials-can-change-value-through-use`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0008-material-redirection-timber`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0011-quality-uncertainty`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0012-settlement-reveals-truth`
-
----
-
-## 13. Success Condition
-
-If the model can keep the timber and possible higher-value use constant while producing six distinct rational readings based on execution, mispricing, access, claims, suitability, and records, this file is functioning correctly.