initial upload
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
|
|||||||
|
# CORPUS-0001
|
||||||
|
## Same Oil Venture, Six Readings
|
||||||
|
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||||
|
### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
|
||||||
|
### Purpose: Teach that the same venture can be interpreted differently by different actor profiles without changing the underlying arithmetic
|
||||||
|
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0001-same-oil-venture-six-readings.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 0. Scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A trader in Ostia considers sending oil to Capua.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The basic venture appears simple.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But the six actor perspectives do not read the opportunity the same way.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The arithmetic may be identical.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The interpretation is not.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 1. Shared Venture Facts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Fact | Value |
|
||||||
|
|---|---:|
|
||||||
|
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||||
|
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||||
|
| Good | oil |
|
||||||
|
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||||
|
| Expected sale price in Capua | 20 asses |
|
||||||
|
| Expected movement and handling cost | 6 asses |
|
||||||
|
| Expected total cost | 16 asses |
|
||||||
|
| Expected profit | 4 asses |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Basic arithmetic:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
20 - 16 = 4 asses expected profit
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
All six actors see or can be shown the same arithmetic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
They do not treat it as the same opportunity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Varro reads the venture through movement, timing, and reliability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- who carries it?
|
||||||
|
- when does the cart leave?
|
||||||
|
- what road condition is known?
|
||||||
|
- who guards the cargo?
|
||||||
|
- where can the route fail?
|
||||||
|
- what happens if departure slips?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Varro does not first ask whether 4 asses is attractive.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks whether the movement can be executed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Varro Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: route reliability
|
||||||
|
risk focus: delay, theft, cart failure, weak discipline
|
||||||
|
decision bias: act only if movement is orderly
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Varro, a profitable venture with unreliable movement is not yet a good venture.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Felix reads the venture through mispricing and speed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- why is oil still 10 asses in Ostia?
|
||||||
|
- who has not yet noticed the Capua demand?
|
||||||
|
- can the oil be bought before the seller raises price?
|
||||||
|
- can part of the cargo be resold before arrival?
|
||||||
|
- who is too respectable to touch this margin?
|
||||||
|
- can the margin be widened through bargaining?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Felix sees the 4-ass expected profit as a starting point, not a final plan.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Felix Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: whether the price gap can be widened
|
||||||
|
risk focus: rivals noticing too soon
|
||||||
|
decision bias: move fast before terms change
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Felix, the opportunity is not “oil to Capua.”
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The opportunity is the brief moment before others reprice it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Lentulus reads the venture through access, names, and future relationships.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- who is the Capua buyer?
|
||||||
|
- whose household does the buyer serve?
|
||||||
|
- does supplying this buyer create introduction?
|
||||||
|
- does the cargo need to appear ordinary or prestigious?
|
||||||
|
- can a small profit produce larger social access?
|
||||||
|
- would this venture look beneath his station?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Lentulus may accept a small margin if it improves access.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He may reject a good margin if it damages standing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Lentulus Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: social access created by the buyer
|
||||||
|
risk focus: reputational mismatch or poor association
|
||||||
|
decision bias: prefer ventures that improve name and access
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Lentulus, the buyer may matter more than the oil.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Crispus reads the venture through obligations, enforceability, and procedural leverage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- is the buyer reliable?
|
||||||
|
- is there a witness?
|
||||||
|
- are terms written or remembered?
|
||||||
|
- when is payment due?
|
||||||
|
- what happens if buyer delays?
|
||||||
|
- can the seller's claim be enforced?
|
||||||
|
- does the venture create or settle an obligation?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Crispus does not trust expected sale value until settlement terms are clear.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Crispus Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: enforceable payment
|
||||||
|
risk focus: unpaid buyer, disputed terms, weak witness
|
||||||
|
decision bias: prefer documented and enforceable arrangements
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Crispus, a profitable sale that cannot be collected is not profit.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Secundus reads the venture through capacity, replacement, and material flow.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- how much oil can the cart actually carry?
|
||||||
|
- what else is moving on the same cart?
|
||||||
|
- does the cart return loaded or empty?
|
||||||
|
- are animals rested?
|
||||||
|
- is the load balanced?
|
||||||
|
- does Capua need oil generally or only a specific buyer?
|
||||||
|
- what supplies are needed on the return leg?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Secundus may improve the venture by linking outbound and return cargo.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Secundus Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: transport capacity and return value
|
||||||
|
risk focus: wasted movement, poor load planning, tired animals
|
||||||
|
decision bias: optimize the whole movement, not one sale
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Secundus, a one-way profit may hide a better round-trip plan.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chresimus reads the venture through records, quantities, obligations, and hidden accounts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He asks:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- is the purchase quantity exact?
|
||||||
|
- is the oil quality recorded?
|
||||||
|
- who owes whom after delivery?
|
||||||
|
- does the buyer pay in coin or claim?
|
||||||
|
- are handling costs final or estimated?
|
||||||
|
- is any part of the cargo already pledged?
|
||||||
|
- do the numbers reconcile after settlement?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chresimus sees the arithmetic as provisional until recorded values are settled.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Chresimus Interpretation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit: 4 asses
|
||||||
|
primary concern: whether the account is complete and accurate
|
||||||
|
risk focus: hidden costs, partial payment, disputed quantity
|
||||||
|
decision bias: verify records before trusting the margin
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For Chresimus, profit exists only after the account balances.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 8. Shared Arithmetic, Different Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The same expected arithmetic:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
expected profit = 4 asses
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
can lead to different conclusions:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Actor | Likely Decision |
|
||||||
|
|---|---|
|
||||||
|
| Varro | proceed only if movement is reliable |
|
||||||
|
| Felix | move quickly and try to improve terms |
|
||||||
|
| Lentulus | proceed if buyer improves access |
|
||||||
|
| Crispus | proceed only with enforceable settlement |
|
||||||
|
| Secundus | restructure around transport capacity and return leg |
|
||||||
|
| Chresimus | verify quantities, obligations, and hidden costs first |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No actor changes the arithmetic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Each actor changes what must be known before acting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 9. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The model should separate:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Category | Meaning |
|
||||||
|
|---|---|
|
||||||
|
| shared facts | venture numbers visible to all |
|
||||||
|
| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
|
||||||
|
| actor risk focus | what each actor fears most |
|
||||||
|
| actor advantage | what each actor can improve |
|
||||||
|
| decision threshold | what must be satisfied before action |
|
||||||
|
| final arithmetic | outcome after settlement |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Actor perspective should alter interpretation, not erase accounting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 10. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The model should not:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- give every actor the same reasoning
|
||||||
|
- let personality replace arithmetic
|
||||||
|
- treat the most confident actor as most correct
|
||||||
|
- assume a 4-ass expected profit means the same thing to all actors
|
||||||
|
- make actor perspective cosmetic
|
||||||
|
- ignore that each actor sees different risks
|
||||||
|
- collapse social, logistical, and accounting concerns into one generic decision
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 11. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This example uses:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0001-trade-requires-two-locations`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0011-round-trip-cart-value`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
|
||||||
|
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0012-settlement-reveals-truth`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 12. Success Condition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the model can hold the same venture arithmetic constant while producing six distinct interpretations based on movement, mispricing, access, enforceability, capacity, and records, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user