Initial commit

docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+# CORPUS-0011
+## Status Changes Access
+### Status: Training Corpus Seed
+### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
+### Purpose: Teach that markets, officials, credit, and information are not equally accessible to all actors
+### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md
+
+---
+
+## 0. Principle
+
+Status changes access.
+
+Two traders may have the same coin, goods, and plan, but receive different treatment.
+
+Access may depend on:
+
+- reputation
+- family name
+- citizenship
+- prior service
+- occupation
+- patronage
+- literacy
+- witnesses
+- public trust
+- social prejudice
+
+The market is not entered equally by every actor.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Roman-Visible Example
+
+A noble younger son asks to speak with a warehouse official.
+
+He is received quickly because his family name carries weight.
+
+A freedman trader asks the same question.
+
+He may wait longer, be asked for proof, or receive less favorable terms.
+
+The information may be the same.
+
+The access is not.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Minimal Access Structure
+
+Access depends on at least:
+
+1. actor identity
+2. public reputation
+3. social rank
+4. trusted introductions
+5. legal standing
+6. prior relationships
+7. perceived reliability
+8. the gatekeeper's interests
+
+Access is a relationship, not a universal right.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
+
+Incorrect assumption:
+
+> Any trader can approach the same person, receive the same answer, and make the same deal.
+
+Correction:
+
+> The same request may produce different outcomes depending on who asks, who hears, and what relationship exists between them.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Simulation Use
+
+This principle supports:
+
+- auctoritas
+- fama
+- clientela
+- ius_accessus
+- queue priority
+- credit access
+- rumor credibility
+- legal enforceability
+- background asymmetry
+
+The model should not treat every actor as having identical access to people, places, or remedies.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Canonical Test
+
+If the model sees:
+
+> The trader asks the official for access to warehouse records.
+
+It must ask:
+
+- who is the trader?
+- what is his reputation?
+- does he have an introduction?
+- does the official benefit by helping him?
+- does his status speed or slow the request?
+- is a witness required?
+- would another actor receive a different answer?
+
+Only then can the action be evaluated.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Success Condition
+
+If the model stops treating access as automatic and starts treating access as shaped by status, reputation, and relationships, this file is functioning correctly.