diff --git a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0014-same-lost-seller-six-readings.md b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0014-same-lost-seller-six-readings.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 3f3844f..0000000
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0014-same-lost-seller-six-readings.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,320 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0014
-## Same Lost Seller, Six Readings
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
-### Purpose: Teach that losing a seller can alter supply access, purchase cost, timing, trust, and future arithmetic differently for each actor profile
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0014-same-lost-seller-six-readings.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Scenario
-
-A trader in Ostia learns that a regular seller will no longer supply him.
-
-The reason is not fully known.
-
-The seller may have found a better buyer, raised prices, lost stock, shifted allegiance, withdrawn credit, changed household obligations, or become unavailable.
-
-All six actors hear the same news.
-
-They do not interpret the loss the same way.
-
----
-
-## 1. Shared Lost Seller Facts
-
-| Fact | Value |
-|---|---|
-| Seller location | Ostia |
-| Prior role | regular seller/source |
-| Goods previously supplied | oil and small imported goods |
-| Prior purchase price | 10 asses |
-| Current seller status | no longer supplying |
-| Reason | uncertain |
-| Replacement seller | unknown |
-| Effect on route | likely negative |
-| Future credit access | uncertain |
-
-The seller was not merely a source of goods.
-
-The seller was an access point, price anchor, credit path, and timing advantage.
-
----
-
-## 2. Basic Arithmetic Effect
-
-Before seller loss:
-
-```text
-purchase price = 10 asses
-movement and handling = 6 asses
-expected sale value = 24 asses
-expected profit = 8 asses
-```
-
-After seller loss, if the trader must buy from a more expensive seller:
-
-```text
-purchase price = 14 asses
-movement and handling = 6 asses
-expected sale value = 24 asses
-expected profit = 4 asses
-```
-
-If replacement supply is uncertain:
-
-```text
-purchase price = unknown
-available quantity = unknown
-venture cannot be evaluated safely
-```
-
-Losing a seller changes future arithmetic by altering purchase price, quality, quantity, timing, and credit.
-
----
-
-## 3. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
-
-Varro reads the lost seller through supply reliability and readiness.
-
-He asks:
-
-- when did the seller become unreliable?
-- can the route still be supplied on schedule?
-- is there a replacement source ready now?
-- does the new seller deliver consistent quantity?
-- can the trader trust the stock to be ready before departure?
-- should the venture halt until supply is secured?
-
-Varro sees the seller as the origin node of the operation.
-
-### Varro Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: origin supply failed
-primary question: where can dependable stock be obtained now?
-risk focus: delayed loading, uncertain quantity, unreliable substitute
-first action: secure a reliable replacement source before committing transport
-```
-
-For Varro, a route cannot begin until the origin source is dependable.
-
----
-
-## 4. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
-
-Felix reads the lost seller through pricing, pressure, and rival capture.
-
-He asks:
-
-- who captured the seller?
-- did the seller find a better price?
-- is the refusal real or bargaining posture?
-- does the seller need better terms, faster coin, or less risk?
-- can another pressured seller be found?
-- can the old seller be recovered through a sharper bargain?
-
-Felix treats the loss as information about the supply market.
-
-### Felix Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: supply price or bargaining position changed
-primary question: who now controls the seller's stock?
-risk focus: overpaying, chasing false refusal, rival locking supply
-first action: test whether the seller is truly lost or repricing the relationship
-```
-
-For Felix, losing the seller may reveal a rival move, seller pressure, or a new bargain elsewhere.
-
----
-
-## 5. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
-
-Lentulus reads the lost seller through reputation, status, and social channel.
-
-He asks:
-
-- why did the seller withdraw?
-- did someone advise him not to deal?
-- does the refusal imply reduced standing?
-- can a higher-status introduction restore supply?
-- is the seller now attached to another household?
-- should the trader avoid appearing rejected?
-
-Lentulus sees seller loss as a possible social signal.
-
-### Lentulus Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: social access to supply may have shifted
-primary question: whose influence redirected the seller?
-risk focus: visible rejection, loss of name-value, rival prestige
-first action: identify the social cause and replace the channel if needed
-```
-
-For Lentulus, the seller matters because refusal may indicate weakening access.
-
----
-
-## 6. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
-
-Crispus reads the lost seller through obligation, credit, and prior terms.
-
-He asks:
-
-- was the seller obligated to supply?
-- was any quantity promised?
-- was a deposit paid?
-- was deferred payment previously allowed?
-- did the seller lawfully withdraw?
-- can the trader claim loss from reliance?
-- should terms be reaffirmed with a replacement seller?
-
-Crispus does not treat seller loss only as inconvenience.
-
-He asks whether a prior obligation failed.
-
-### Crispus Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: prior supply obligation may have failed
-primary question: was there a binding commitment or only expectation?
-risk focus: lost deposit, failed supply, weak witness, credit withdrawal
-first action: examine terms, deposits, witnesses, and remedy options
-```
-
-For Crispus, losing a seller matters differently if the seller broke a commitment rather than merely changed preference.
-
----
-
-## 7. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
-
-Secundus reads the lost seller through supply volume, substitute goods, and flow.
-
-He asks:
-
-- how much volume did the seller usually provide?
-- can the route be supplied from smaller sellers?
-- can cargo be changed to another good?
-- can the cart still be filled efficiently?
-- does the substitute supply match quality and packing needs?
-- can return cargo or mixed cargo compensate?
-
-Secundus treats seller loss as a supply-chain break.
-
-### Secundus Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: origin capacity disappeared or shifted
-primary question: what supply volume can replace the lost source?
-risk focus: underfilled cart, wrong goods, poor quality, inefficient movement
-first action: map substitute suppliers, quantities, and cargo mix
-```
-
-For Secundus, the problem is not only price. It is whether the route still has enough suitable cargo to move.
-
----
-
-## 8. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
-
-Chresimus reads the lost seller through accounts, balances, and prior dealing.
-
-He asks:
-
-- did the trader owe the seller anything?
-- were prior payments late?
-- was quantity disputed before?
-- did the seller change terms after an account problem?
-- was any stock already pledged elsewhere?
-- should the seller be marked unavailable, hostile, or merely uncertain?
-
-Chresimus wants to know whether the loss was already visible in the records.
-
-### Chresimus Interpretation
-
-```text
-lost seller: account relationship changed
-primary question: what do prior balances, disputes, and payment terms reveal?
-risk focus: unpaid balance, stale obligation, hidden claim, false supply assumption
-first action: reconcile seller account before deciding whether to repair or replace
-```
-
-For Chresimus, a seller may be lost because the account weakened before the refusal became explicit.
-
----
-
-## 9. Same Lost Seller, Different First Actions
-
-| Actor | First Action |
-|---|---|
-| Varro | secure a dependable replacement source before movement |
-| Felix | determine whether refusal is real, bargaining, or rival capture |
-| Lentulus | identify social cause and restore or replace access |
-| Crispus | examine whether a supply commitment was broken |
-| Secundus | map substitute supply volume and cargo mix |
-| Chresimus | reconcile seller account and prior payment history |
-
-The seller loss is the same.
-
-The recovery path differs.
-
----
-
-## 10. Correct Model Behavior
-
-The model should separate:
-
-| Category | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| seller_status | no longer supplying |
-| known_reason | what is actually known about why |
-| hidden_reason | true cause if not yet known |
-| arithmetic effect | higher or uncertain purchase cost |
-| supply effect | origin access weakened |
-| credit effect | deferred payment may disappear |
-| actor lens | how each actor diagnoses the loss |
-| recovery path | how each actor seeks replacement or repair |
-
-A seller is an economic relationship, not just a price source.
-
----
-
-## 11. Incorrect Model Behavior
-
-The model should not:
-
-- treat a lost seller as only a higher purchase price
-- assume the reason is known without evidence
-- ignore rival capture
-- ignore reputation or status effects
-- ignore prior deposits or supply commitments
-- ignore quality and quantity differences from replacement sellers
-- make all actors seek the same replacement
-- keep old route arithmetic after the seller disappears
-
----
-
-## 12. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
-
-This example uses:
-
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0002-goods-have-local-prices`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
-- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0009-credit-allows-action-without-coin`
-- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0012-reputation-loss-changes-future-arithmetic`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0010-information-can-be-withheld`
-- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0011-quality-uncertainty`
-
----
-
-## 13. Success Condition
-
-If the model can treat loss of a seller as a change in supply access, purchase cost, quantity, quality, credit, and future arithmetic while producing six distinct rational readings, this file is functioning correctly.