Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-30 05:25:21 -04:00
parent c647be1ba3
commit f33d5fde49

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
# CORPUS-0012
## Every Venture Risks Loss
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
### Purpose: Teach that every commercial action can fail through price change, delay, damage, bad information, or unmet obligations
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss.md
---
## 0. Principle
Every venture risks loss.
A trader may plan well and still lose value.
Loss can come from:
- price changes
- delay
- spoilage
- breakage
- theft
- bad information
- failed credit
- blocked access
- higher-than-expected costs
- buyer refusal
- route disruption
A venture is not safe because it looks profitable at the start.
---
## 1. Roman-Visible Example
A trader buys oil in Ostia to sell in Capua.
The expected sale price is good.
But before sale:
- the cart is delayed
- one amphora leaks
- another trader arrives first
- Capua buyers lower their offers
- storage costs rise
- the buyer who promised purchase cannot pay
The trader did not make a foolish plan.
The venture still risks loss because the world changed before settlement.
---
## 2. Minimal Risk Structure
A venture has risk wherever something can change between decision and result.
At minimum, risk depends on:
1. time in motion
2. route reliability
3. price uncertainty
4. information quality
5. storage quality
6. buyer reliability
7. cost uncertainty
8. actor access and reputation
No venture is complete until settlement occurs.
---
## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
Incorrect assumption:
> If the planned sale price is higher than the purchase price, the venture is safe.
Correction:
> A venture is only safe after costs are paid, goods or claims are settled, and obligations are fulfilled.
Expected profit is not actual profit.
---
## 4. Simulation Use
This principle supports:
- venture risk
- loss events
- delayed settlement
- price movement
- damaged goods
- unreliable buyers
- insurance-like behavior where historically appropriate
- diversification
- cautious versus aggressive actors
The model should not treat a venture as guaranteed because its starting arithmetic is favorable.
---
## 5. Canonical Test
If the model sees:
> The trader expects to earn 5 asses.
It must ask:
- what can go wrong before settlement?
- how reliable is the route?
- how certain is the destination price?
- can the buyer pay?
- can costs increase?
- can goods be damaged?
- is the information current?
- when does expected profit become actual profit?
Only then can the venture be evaluated.
---
## 6. Success Condition
If the model stops treating expected profit as guaranteed and starts treating every venture as exposed to change before settlement, this file is functioning correctly.