initial upload
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0006
|
||||
## Confirmation Has A Cost
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_2--Uncertainty
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that reducing uncertainty requires time, effort, access, and sometimes coin, and may reduce or close the opportunity being investigated
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_2--Uncertainty/CORPUS-0006-confirmation-has-a-cost.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia hears that oil prices are high in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
He can act immediately on uncertain information.
|
||||
|
||||
Or he can seek confirmation first.
|
||||
|
||||
Confirmation may improve decision quality.
|
||||
|
||||
But confirmation is not free.
|
||||
|
||||
It may cost time, coin, access, attention, and opportunity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Initial Report
|
||||
|
||||
A porter says:
|
||||
|
||||
> Oil buyers in Capua are paying high prices.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader does not know whether the report is true, stale, exaggerated, or specific to one buyer.
|
||||
|
||||
He considers confirming the report before acting.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Confirmation Options
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Cost | Benefit |
|
||||
|---|---:|---|
|
||||
| ask a second source at the quay | low time | modest confidence |
|
||||
| send a runner to a road contact | coin + time | stronger confidence |
|
||||
| wait for next cart from Capua | time | fresh report |
|
||||
| ask a trusted buyer by letter | long delay | high confidence if answered |
|
||||
| inspect rival preparations | social risk + time | indirect evidence |
|
||||
| reserve transport while checking | coin or obligation | preserves option |
|
||||
|
||||
Each option reduces uncertainty differently.
|
||||
|
||||
None is free.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Example: Immediate Action
|
||||
|
||||
If the trader acts immediately:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
information_confidence = low
|
||||
timing_advantage = high
|
||||
confirmation_cost = 0
|
||||
risk_of_wrong_price = high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
He may profit if the report is accurate and rivals have not moved.
|
||||
|
||||
He may lose if the report is wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Example: Delayed Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
If the trader waits two days for confirmation:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
information_confidence = higher
|
||||
timing_advantage = lower
|
||||
confirmation_cost = time + possible lost cart space
|
||||
risk_of_missed_opportunity = higher
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
By the time he confirms the price, others may have acted.
|
||||
|
||||
The confirmed opportunity may no longer exist.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Arithmetic Example
|
||||
|
||||
Initial expected venture:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
expected sale price = 22 asses
|
||||
total cost = 16 asses
|
||||
expected profit = 6 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The trader spends 2 asses to confirm the report and loses one day.
|
||||
|
||||
If the price remains high:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 22 asses
|
||||
total cost = 16 + 2 confirmation cost
|
||||
result = 4 asses profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If delay allows rivals to reach Capua first and price falls:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 18 asses
|
||||
total cost = 18 asses
|
||||
result = 0 profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Confirmation improved knowledge but narrowed the margin.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should treat confirmation as an action with cost.
|
||||
|
||||
It should track:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| uncertainty_reduction | what becomes better known |
|
||||
| confirmation_cost | coin, time, obligation, or access spent |
|
||||
| opportunity_decay | how the opportunity changes while confirming |
|
||||
| timing_advantage_loss | what rivals may gain |
|
||||
| remaining_margin | profit after confirmation cost |
|
||||
| confidence_after_confirmation | improved but not necessarily perfect knowledge |
|
||||
|
||||
Confirmation reduces some risk.
|
||||
|
||||
It may create other cost.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not:
|
||||
|
||||
- assume verification is free
|
||||
- assume waiting only improves decisions
|
||||
- ignore lost time
|
||||
- ignore rival action during confirmation
|
||||
- ignore confirmation cost in final arithmetic
|
||||
- treat confirmation as perfect knowledge
|
||||
- force immediate action as always better
|
||||
- force waiting as always safer
|
||||
|
||||
Both immediate action and confirmation can be rational.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Decision Questions
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- how uncertain is the report?
|
||||
- how large is the expected margin?
|
||||
- how fast can the opportunity close?
|
||||
- what does confirmation cost?
|
||||
- how much confidence does confirmation add?
|
||||
- who else may act while I verify?
|
||||
- can I reserve the option while confirming?
|
||||
- can I reduce exposure instead of fully waiting?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Layer-0 And Layer-1 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
|
||||
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
|
||||
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
|
||||
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture`
|
||||
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price`
|
||||
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model stops treating confirmation as free certainty and starts treating it as a cost-bearing action that may improve knowledge while reducing opportunity, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user