Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
parent
11534da416
commit
5dceb94d33
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|||
# CIVICVS Artifact Entry
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact ID
|
||||
|
||||
CAE-OG-2025-HOA-BROKEN-GOVERNANCE
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Title
|
||||
|
||||
Homeowners Associations (HOAs): Pseudo-Governance Without Civic Legitimacy
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Category
|
||||
|
||||
**Organizational Guise (OG)** — Pseudo-Governments
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
Homeowners Associations (HOAs) present themselves as **community governance entities** intended to maintain property values, manage shared spaces, and enhance neighborhood quality of life.
|
||||
|
||||
In practice, HOAs often operate as **quasi-governments**:
|
||||
|
||||
* Run by untrained, unelected, or underqualified individuals.
|
||||
* Exercising life-changing powers over residents, including liens, fines, and foreclosures.
|
||||
* Enforcing restrictive covenants (CC\&Rs) that shape personal property rights, often without due process or meaningful recourse.
|
||||
|
||||
This creates a civic misalignment: **governance powers without civic protocols** (elections, transparency, appeals, constitutional safeguards).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source of Truth
|
||||
|
||||
* **Bylaws & Covenants (CC\&Rs):** Immutable contracts recorded in property deeds.
|
||||
* **Board Records:** Meeting minutes, financial statements.
|
||||
* **Legal Proceedings:** Court filings involving HOA disputes, foreclosures, resident appeals.
|
||||
* **Tax & Funding Records:** Annual budgets, mandatory dues, fines.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Preservation
|
||||
|
||||
* Property filings and CC\&Rs are permanent legal artifacts.
|
||||
* Board minutes and financials should be archived in IPFS or equivalent immutable store.
|
||||
* Case law involving HOAs is preserved in public judicial records.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Analyst Notes
|
||||
|
||||
* **Civic Significance:** HOAs embody the risk of *private governance with public consequence*.
|
||||
* **Civic Risk:** Residents are subject to coercive power without institutional safeguards of civic governance.
|
||||
* **Civic Value:** Documenting HOAs as pseudo-governments exposes the fragility of civic legitimacy when authority is exercised without training, ethics, or accountability.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Civic Consequence
|
||||
|
||||
HOAs are a canonical example of **Organizational Guise (OG)**:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Claimed Purpose:** Community governance and property value protection.
|
||||
* **Actual Output:** Arbitrary and sometimes abusive exercises of power over residents.
|
||||
* **Misalignment:** Life-changing authority wielded by unqualified actors without civic legitimacy.
|
||||
|
||||
This exemplar establishes the **Pseudo-Government subtype** within OG. It demonstrates that not all organizational guises are NGOs or nonprofits; some are *private micro-governments* whose civic impact rivals or exceeds that of official bodies.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Status:** Artifact Entry filed.
|
||||
**Subtype Established:** OG-Pseudo-Governments.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|||
# CIVICVS Artifact Entry
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifact ID
|
||||
|
||||
CAE-OG-2025-NPR-PUBLIC-BROADCASTING
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Title
|
||||
|
||||
National Public Radio (NPR): State-Subsidized Media as Public Service Guise
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Category
|
||||
|
||||
**Organizational Guise (OG)** — State-Subsidized Guise
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
National Public Radio (NPR) presents itself as a **public service broadcaster**, funded in part by U.S. taxpayers and private donations, with the mission of providing **independent, balanced journalism in the public interest**.
|
||||
|
||||
In practice, NPR functions as a **state-subsidized information broker** that frequently:
|
||||
|
||||
* Aligns coverage with partisan or elite narratives.
|
||||
* Uses public funding to maintain an image of neutrality while functioning as an advocacy outlet.
|
||||
* Fails to provide citizens with transparent mechanisms of accountability despite compulsory support via tax allocation.
|
||||
|
||||
This creates a civic misalignment: **taxpayer-funded neutrality claimed, partisan advocacy delivered**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source of Truth
|
||||
|
||||
* **Funding Records:** Congressional appropriations, IRS filings, NPR Foundation reports.
|
||||
* **Governance Documents:** Board membership, public mission statements.
|
||||
* **Editorial Records:** Publicly accessible guidelines, archived programming.
|
||||
* **Audits & Investigations:** Independent evaluations, public controversies.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Preservation
|
||||
|
||||
* Federal funding allocations and IRS filings are immutable public records.
|
||||
* Program archives and editorial guidelines should be preserved via IPFS, timestamping, and institutional repositories.
|
||||
* Media controversies and investigative reports must be recorded as comparative context.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Analyst Notes
|
||||
|
||||
* **Civic Significance:** NPR demonstrates how publicly funded organizations can cloak themselves in **civic neutrality** while functioning as partisan actors.
|
||||
* **Civic Risk:** Citizens are compelled to fund institutions that may not uphold civic ethics of balance, disclosure, and independence.
|
||||
* **Civic Value:** Documenting NPR as a **state-subsidized guise** protects the civic record from the moral rhetoric of “public service” when actual outputs diverge.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Civic Consequence
|
||||
|
||||
NPR is a canonical example of **Organizational Guise (OG)** in the **State-Subsidized subtype**:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Claimed Purpose:** Neutral, independent public broadcasting.
|
||||
* **Actual Output:** Advocacy journalism aligned with partisan or elite narratives.
|
||||
* **Misalignment:** Taxpayer funding legitimizes partiality, undermining public trust in journalism.
|
||||
|
||||
This exemplar expands OG beyond NGOs and pseudo-governments to include **publicly funded institutions** whose civic posture masks agenda-driven behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Status:** Artifact Entry filed.
|
||||
**Subtype Established:** OG-State-Subsidized Guise.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|||
# CIVICVS Foundation Document
|
||||
|
||||
## Document ID
|
||||
|
||||
CFD-AI-2024-HARVARD-GAY-RESIGNATION
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Title
|
||||
|
||||
Academic Integrity Collapse: Claudine Gay’s Resignation from Harvard University
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Category
|
||||
|
||||
**Foundation Exemplar** — Academic Integrity as Civic Artifact
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
To establish *academic integrity* as a category of civic artifacts within CIVICVS.
|
||||
Academic integrity failures are not merely professional lapses; they constitute civic breaches because knowledge production and transmission are **civic protocols** that safeguard the public good.
|
||||
|
||||
This document formalizes how CIVICVS records and analyzes such cases: through preservation of institutional actions, constructed evidence (plagiarism exhibits), and the civic consequences of compromised integrity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Case Description
|
||||
|
||||
Claudine Gay, the 30th President of Harvard University, resigned in January 2024 following mounting plagiarism allegations in her academic work.
|
||||
|
||||
The controversy centered on multiple publications alleged to contain unattributed or insufficiently cited material. The allegations, widely publicized and politically amplified, culminated in Harvard’s formal acceptance of her resignation.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Harvard’s governance communications and resignation announcement.
|
||||
* **Tier-2 (Constructed Immutable Evidence):** Side-by-side comparisons of published texts demonstrating overlap with prior works.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Immutable Processes & Records
|
||||
|
||||
* **Institutional Governance:** Appointment, resignation, and board communications are recorded in official Harvard governance proceedings.
|
||||
* **Academic Publication:** Articles, dissertations, and books are permanently preserved in institutional repositories and journals.
|
||||
* **Plagiarism Analysis:** Comparative exhibits can be reproduced from source texts, establishing constructed immutability.
|
||||
* **Media and Public Record:** Contemporaneous reporting preserved in archives, though secondary.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Analyst Notes
|
||||
|
||||
* **Civic Significance:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Academic integrity is a civic protocol: without attribution and reproducibility, society loses trust in its knowledge infrastructure.
|
||||
* The collapse of integrity at the highest academic office demonstrates how individual misconduct can escalate into institutional crisis.
|
||||
* **Civic Risk:**
|
||||
|
||||
* When institutions defend or obscure integrity failures, civic damage expands beyond academia, eroding public confidence in knowledge systems.
|
||||
* **Civic Value:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Preserving such cases ensures that academic integrity breaches are treated not as scandals but as civic artifacts — reproducible, auditable, and precedent-setting.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Civic Consequence
|
||||
|
||||
The resignation of Harvard’s president under plagiarism accusations establishes **Academic Integrity Collapse** as a category of civic artifact.
|
||||
|
||||
* It shows how violations of academic ethics (citation, attribution) are civic breaches, not private failings.
|
||||
* It highlights the necessity of preserving comparative evidence (side-by-side text) as constructed immutable artifacts.
|
||||
* It provides a reference case for future CIVICVS analysts, ensuring academic integrity is systematically treated as a civic domain, comparable to conflicts of interest and contested identity claims.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
|
||||
**Category Established:** Academic Integrity (AI) — all future cases of plagiarism, falsified data, or integrity violations in scholarship shall be recorded under this category.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|||
# CIVICVS Foundation Document
|
||||
|
||||
## Document ID
|
||||
|
||||
CFD-CIR-1990-WARREN-TRIBAL-CLAIM
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Title
|
||||
|
||||
Contested Ethnic Identity Claims: Elizabeth Warren and Tribal Affiliation Records
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Category
|
||||
|
||||
**Foundation Exemplar** — Contested Immutable Record (CIR) as Civic Artifact
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
To establish **Contested Immutable Records** as a civic artifact category. These occur when **immutable by origin records** (forms, applications, official listings) contain entries whose accuracy or legitimacy is challenged by **counter-artifacts** (statements, tests, cultural authority).
|
||||
|
||||
This document formalizes how CIVICVS records contested artifacts: preserving both the official record and the counter-records without collapsing them into a single truth claim.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Case Description
|
||||
|
||||
Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Senator, was accused of identifying as “Native American” in certain law school and employment records in the 1980s–1990s.
|
||||
|
||||
She denied opportunistic misrepresentation but later took a DNA test (2018) to demonstrate Native ancestry. The Cherokee Nation rejected DNA as a valid basis for tribal identity.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Application forms, faculty directories.
|
||||
* **Tier-2 (Constructed Evidence):** DNA test analysis, tribal press statements, public interviews.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Immutable Processes & Records
|
||||
|
||||
* University application and directory records.
|
||||
* Published DNA study.
|
||||
* Official tribal statements.
|
||||
* Public media coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Analyst Notes
|
||||
|
||||
* **Civic Significance:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Demonstrates that official records are not always sufficient: they can encode claims that remain disputed.
|
||||
* Shows why cultural and community authority must be preserved alongside institutional records.
|
||||
* **Civic Risk:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Collapsing the artifact set into “true/false” destroys nuance.
|
||||
* **Civic Value:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Preserving all linked artifacts side by side reflects civic reality: the record is permanently fractured, not resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Civic Consequence
|
||||
|
||||
This case establishes **Contested Immutable Record (CIR)** as a CIVICVS category.
|
||||
|
||||
Such artifacts show that official records, scientific evidence, and cultural authority can remain in permanent tension. Civic legitimacy requires preserving *all artifacts and their relationships*, not selecting one as “the truth.”
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
|
||||
**Category Established:** Contested Immutable Record (CIR).
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue