Initial commit

This commit is contained in:
TheRON 2025-09-22 05:46:30 -04:00
parent 11534da416
commit 5dceb94d33
4 changed files with 299 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# CIVICVS Artifact Entry
## Artifact ID
CAE-OG-2025-HOA-BROKEN-GOVERNANCE
---
## Title
Homeowners Associations (HOAs): Pseudo-Governance Without Civic Legitimacy
---
## Category
**Organizational Guise (OG)** — Pseudo-Governments
---
## Description
Homeowners Associations (HOAs) present themselves as **community governance entities** intended to maintain property values, manage shared spaces, and enhance neighborhood quality of life.
In practice, HOAs often operate as **quasi-governments**:
* Run by untrained, unelected, or underqualified individuals.
* Exercising life-changing powers over residents, including liens, fines, and foreclosures.
* Enforcing restrictive covenants (CC\&Rs) that shape personal property rights, often without due process or meaningful recourse.
This creates a civic misalignment: **governance powers without civic protocols** (elections, transparency, appeals, constitutional safeguards).
---
## Source of Truth
* **Bylaws & Covenants (CC\&Rs):** Immutable contracts recorded in property deeds.
* **Board Records:** Meeting minutes, financial statements.
* **Legal Proceedings:** Court filings involving HOA disputes, foreclosures, resident appeals.
* **Tax & Funding Records:** Annual budgets, mandatory dues, fines.
---
## Preservation
* Property filings and CC\&Rs are permanent legal artifacts.
* Board minutes and financials should be archived in IPFS or equivalent immutable store.
* Case law involving HOAs is preserved in public judicial records.
---
## Analyst Notes
* **Civic Significance:** HOAs embody the risk of *private governance with public consequence*.
* **Civic Risk:** Residents are subject to coercive power without institutional safeguards of civic governance.
* **Civic Value:** Documenting HOAs as pseudo-governments exposes the fragility of civic legitimacy when authority is exercised without training, ethics, or accountability.
---
## Civic Consequence
HOAs are a canonical example of **Organizational Guise (OG)**:
* **Claimed Purpose:** Community governance and property value protection.
* **Actual Output:** Arbitrary and sometimes abusive exercises of power over residents.
* **Misalignment:** Life-changing authority wielded by unqualified actors without civic legitimacy.
This exemplar establishes the **Pseudo-Government subtype** within OG. It demonstrates that not all organizational guises are NGOs or nonprofits; some are *private micro-governments* whose civic impact rivals or exceeds that of official bodies.
---
**Status:** Artifact Entry filed.
**Subtype Established:** OG-Pseudo-Governments.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# CIVICVS Artifact Entry
## Artifact ID
CAE-OG-2025-NPR-PUBLIC-BROADCASTING
---
## Title
National Public Radio (NPR): State-Subsidized Media as Public Service Guise
---
## Category
**Organizational Guise (OG)** — State-Subsidized Guise
---
## Description
National Public Radio (NPR) presents itself as a **public service broadcaster**, funded in part by U.S. taxpayers and private donations, with the mission of providing **independent, balanced journalism in the public interest**.
In practice, NPR functions as a **state-subsidized information broker** that frequently:
* Aligns coverage with partisan or elite narratives.
* Uses public funding to maintain an image of neutrality while functioning as an advocacy outlet.
* Fails to provide citizens with transparent mechanisms of accountability despite compulsory support via tax allocation.
This creates a civic misalignment: **taxpayer-funded neutrality claimed, partisan advocacy delivered**.
---
## Source of Truth
* **Funding Records:** Congressional appropriations, IRS filings, NPR Foundation reports.
* **Governance Documents:** Board membership, public mission statements.
* **Editorial Records:** Publicly accessible guidelines, archived programming.
* **Audits & Investigations:** Independent evaluations, public controversies.
---
## Preservation
* Federal funding allocations and IRS filings are immutable public records.
* Program archives and editorial guidelines should be preserved via IPFS, timestamping, and institutional repositories.
* Media controversies and investigative reports must be recorded as comparative context.
---
## Analyst Notes
* **Civic Significance:** NPR demonstrates how publicly funded organizations can cloak themselves in **civic neutrality** while functioning as partisan actors.
* **Civic Risk:** Citizens are compelled to fund institutions that may not uphold civic ethics of balance, disclosure, and independence.
* **Civic Value:** Documenting NPR as a **state-subsidized guise** protects the civic record from the moral rhetoric of “public service” when actual outputs diverge.
---
## Civic Consequence
NPR is a canonical example of **Organizational Guise (OG)** in the **State-Subsidized subtype**:
* **Claimed Purpose:** Neutral, independent public broadcasting.
* **Actual Output:** Advocacy journalism aligned with partisan or elite narratives.
* **Misalignment:** Taxpayer funding legitimizes partiality, undermining public trust in journalism.
This exemplar expands OG beyond NGOs and pseudo-governments to include **publicly funded institutions** whose civic posture masks agenda-driven behavior.
---
**Status:** Artifact Entry filed.
**Subtype Established:** OG-State-Subsidized Guise.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# CIVICVS Foundation Document
## Document ID
CFD-AI-2024-HARVARD-GAY-RESIGNATION
---
## Title
Academic Integrity Collapse: Claudine Gays Resignation from Harvard University
---
## Category
**Foundation Exemplar** — Academic Integrity as Civic Artifact
---
## Purpose
To establish *academic integrity* as a category of civic artifacts within CIVICVS.
Academic integrity failures are not merely professional lapses; they constitute civic breaches because knowledge production and transmission are **civic protocols** that safeguard the public good.
This document formalizes how CIVICVS records and analyzes such cases: through preservation of institutional actions, constructed evidence (plagiarism exhibits), and the civic consequences of compromised integrity.
---
## Case Description
Claudine Gay, the 30th President of Harvard University, resigned in January 2024 following mounting plagiarism allegations in her academic work.
The controversy centered on multiple publications alleged to contain unattributed or insufficiently cited material. The allegations, widely publicized and politically amplified, culminated in Harvards formal acceptance of her resignation.
* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Harvards governance communications and resignation announcement.
* **Tier-2 (Constructed Immutable Evidence):** Side-by-side comparisons of published texts demonstrating overlap with prior works.
---
## Known Immutable Processes & Records
* **Institutional Governance:** Appointment, resignation, and board communications are recorded in official Harvard governance proceedings.
* **Academic Publication:** Articles, dissertations, and books are permanently preserved in institutional repositories and journals.
* **Plagiarism Analysis:** Comparative exhibits can be reproduced from source texts, establishing constructed immutability.
* **Media and Public Record:** Contemporaneous reporting preserved in archives, though secondary.
---
## Analyst Notes
* **Civic Significance:**
* Academic integrity is a civic protocol: without attribution and reproducibility, society loses trust in its knowledge infrastructure.
* The collapse of integrity at the highest academic office demonstrates how individual misconduct can escalate into institutional crisis.
* **Civic Risk:**
* When institutions defend or obscure integrity failures, civic damage expands beyond academia, eroding public confidence in knowledge systems.
* **Civic Value:**
* Preserving such cases ensures that academic integrity breaches are treated not as scandals but as civic artifacts — reproducible, auditable, and precedent-setting.
---
## Civic Consequence
The resignation of Harvards president under plagiarism accusations establishes **Academic Integrity Collapse** as a category of civic artifact.
* It shows how violations of academic ethics (citation, attribution) are civic breaches, not private failings.
* It highlights the necessity of preserving comparative evidence (side-by-side text) as constructed immutable artifacts.
* It provides a reference case for future CIVICVS analysts, ensuring academic integrity is systematically treated as a civic domain, comparable to conflicts of interest and contested identity claims.
---
**Status:** Foundation Document filed.
**Category Established:** Academic Integrity (AI) — all future cases of plagiarism, falsified data, or integrity violations in scholarship shall be recorded under this category.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# CIVICVS Foundation Document
## Document ID
CFD-CIR-1990-WARREN-TRIBAL-CLAIM
---
## Title
Contested Ethnic Identity Claims: Elizabeth Warren and Tribal Affiliation Records
---
## Category
**Foundation Exemplar** — Contested Immutable Record (CIR) as Civic Artifact
---
## Purpose
To establish **Contested Immutable Records** as a civic artifact category. These occur when **immutable by origin records** (forms, applications, official listings) contain entries whose accuracy or legitimacy is challenged by **counter-artifacts** (statements, tests, cultural authority).
This document formalizes how CIVICVS records contested artifacts: preserving both the official record and the counter-records without collapsing them into a single truth claim.
---
## Case Description
Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Senator, was accused of identifying as “Native American” in certain law school and employment records in the 1980s1990s.
She denied opportunistic misrepresentation but later took a DNA test (2018) to demonstrate Native ancestry. The Cherokee Nation rejected DNA as a valid basis for tribal identity.
* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Application forms, faculty directories.
* **Tier-2 (Constructed Evidence):** DNA test analysis, tribal press statements, public interviews.
---
## Known Immutable Processes & Records
* University application and directory records.
* Published DNA study.
* Official tribal statements.
* Public media coverage.
---
## Analyst Notes
* **Civic Significance:**
* Demonstrates that official records are not always sufficient: they can encode claims that remain disputed.
* Shows why cultural and community authority must be preserved alongside institutional records.
* **Civic Risk:**
* Collapsing the artifact set into “true/false” destroys nuance.
* **Civic Value:**
* Preserving all linked artifacts side by side reflects civic reality: the record is permanently fractured, not resolved.
---
## Civic Consequence
This case establishes **Contested Immutable Record (CIR)** as a CIVICVS category.
Such artifacts show that official records, scientific evidence, and cultural authority can remain in permanent tension. Civic legitimacy requires preserving *all artifacts and their relationships*, not selecting one as “the truth.”
---
**Status:** Foundation Document filed.
**Category Established:** Contested Immutable Record (CIR).