Initial commit

docs/CIVICVS Artifact Entry CFD-COI-2021-PFIZER-WEF-JSMITH.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# CIVICVS Foundation Document
+
+## Document ID
+
+CFD-COI-2021-PFIZER-WEF-JSMITH
+
+---
+
+## Title
+
+Conflict of Interest: Jim Smith (Pfizer Board / WEF “Partnering Against Corruption Initiative”)
+
+---
+
+## Category
+
+**Foundation Exemplar** — Conflict of Interest (COI) as Civic Artifact
+
+---
+
+## Purpose
+
+To establish **conflict of interest** as a civic artifact category. Conflicts of interest are **naturally immutable evidence**, derived from institutional permanence (board memberships, corporate filings, governance records).
+
+This document formalizes how CIVICVS records and evaluates COIs: as structural overlaps that compromise ethical protocols of independence and accountability.
+
+---
+
+## Case Description
+
+Jim Smith, a member of the Board of Directors at Pfizer, was simultaneously listed as serving on the World Economic Forum’s *Partnering Against Corruption Initiative*.
+
+* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Corporate filings (Pfizer SEC documents), WEF membership lists, official biographies.
+* **Tier-2 (Constructed Immutable Evidence):** Archival preservation (Internet Archive, IPFS) for redundancy.
+
+---
+
+## Known Immutable Processes & Records
+
+* Corporate governance filings (Pfizer Board of Directors).
+* WEF organizational membership rosters.
+* Press releases and official biographies.
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Notes
+
+* **Civic Significance:**
+
+  * Conflicts of interest explain *why* certain narratives emerge and persist.
+  * They are often ignored or minimized by journalism despite their centrality.
+* **Civic Risk:**
+
+  * When COIs are downplayed, institutional credibility collapses.
+* **Civic Value:**
+
+  * Because these artifacts are immutable by origin, they form **primary evidence** of influence operations.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+This case establishes **Conflict of Interest** as a **primary CIVICVS category**. Such artifacts require elevation, not as background context but as central civic evidence.
+
+By foregrounding immutable COIs, analysts restore ethics over morality, showing structural power overlaps as civic facts.
+
+---
+
+✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
+**Category Established:** Conflict of Interest (COI).
+

docs/CIVICVS Artifact Entry CFD-MA-2010-2025-NEW-MEDIA-ACTORS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+# CIVICVS Foundation Document
+
+## Document ID
+
+CFD-MA-2010-2025-NEW-MEDIA-ACTORS
+
+---
+
+## Title
+
+Media Actors: Podcasts, Citizen Journalists, Paid Influencers, Temporary Viral, Fake News, and the Civic Analyst
+
+---
+
+## Category
+
+**Foundation Exemplar** — Media Actors (MA) as Civic Artifact
+
+---
+
+## Purpose
+
+To establish **Media Actors (MA)** as a category of civic artifacts within CIVICVS.
+
+Media actors shape civic discourse through **new channels** outside traditional journalism and governance. Unlike immutable institutional records, these artifacts are fragile, mutable, and often ephemeral. They require civic classification so they can be preserved, evaluated, and contextualized.
+
+This document formalizes how analysts identify and treat different media actors, distinguishing between **civic noise** and **civic evidence**, and highlighting the **Civic Analyst** as a corrective role.
+
+---
+
+## Actor Types
+
+### 1. **Podcasts**
+
+* **Role:** Long-form, decentralized narrative production.
+* **Artifacts:** Transcripts, hosting logs, episode catalogs.
+* **Civic Risk:** Episodes may be removed or altered; opinions can be mistaken for evidence.
+* **Civic Value:** When immutably preserved, they provide contextual civic narrative environments.
+
+### 2. **Citizen Journalists**
+
+* **Role:** Individuals documenting events outside institutions.
+* **Artifacts:** Raw footage, live streams, direct accounts.
+* **Civic Risk:** Vulnerable to loss, misattribution, or suppression.
+* **Civic Value:** High — often first to capture civic events before institutions respond.
+
+### 3. **Paid Influencers**
+
+* **Role:** Actors compensated to promote narratives, products, or agendas.
+* **Artifacts:** Sponsorship contracts, promotional metadata, platform disclosures.
+* **Civic Risk:** Undisclosed financial ties blur propaganda and genuine civic speech.
+* **Civic Value:** Must be documented to expose influence operations and conflicts of interest.
+
+### 4. **Temporary Viral**
+
+* **Role:** Short-lived but intense phenomena (memes, hashtags, clips).
+* **Artifacts:** Screenshots, engagement logs, trending charts.
+* **Civic Risk:** Extremely fragile; vanish quickly without archival.
+* **Civic Value:** Capture the civic “temperature” of society at moments of high volatility.
+
+### 5. **Fake News / AI Fake**
+
+* **Role:** Deliberate falsehoods, AI-generated artifacts, parody mistaken as reality.
+* **Artifacts:** Fabricated articles, synthetic media, satire misframed.
+* **Civic Risk:** Pollutes the civic record if misclassified as evidence.
+* **Civic Value:** Preserved only as **Civic Noise Artifacts** — documented for impact, but never elevated as valid evidence.
+
+### 6. **Civic Analyst**
+
+* **Role:** A self-trained actor producing artifacts under CIVICVS standards.
+* **Representation:** Does not represent institutions, parties, or corporations — only the CIVICVS framework.
+* **Artifacts:** Civic Artifact Entries (CAE), Context Dossiers (CCD), Foundation Documents (CFD).
+* **Civic Risk:** May be confused with influencers or bloggers if boundaries are not clear.
+* **Civic Value:** Provides the **audit trail** that other actors cannot — turning fragile narratives into immutable civic record.
+
+---
+
+## Known Immutable Processes & Records
+
+* Hosting logs and platform metadata (for podcasts, viral media).
+* Sponsorship and financial disclosure requirements (for influencers).
+* Raw footage and timestamps (for citizen journalists).
+* Preservation hashes and timestamps (for Civic Analysts).
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Notes
+
+* **Civic Significance:** Media actors shape discourse but usually leave no durable civic record.
+* **Civic Risk:** Without CIVICVS, narratives dissolve or mutate, leaving history to be rewritten by power.
+* **Civic Value:** By classifying these actors, CIVICVS creates a framework to separate **noise, influence, and civic evidence**.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+By defining Media Actors as a Foundation category, CIVICVS ensures that analysts:
+
+* Preserve narratives without mistaking them for evidence.
+* Recognize influence operations disguised as journalism or entertainment.
+* Track the fragility of viral phenomena.
+* Establish the **Civic Analyst** as a distinct, disciplined actor who provides permanence and neutrality.
+
+---
+
+✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
+**Category Established:** Media Actors (MA).
+

docs/CIVICVS Artifact Entry CFD-MI-2025-MEDIA-INFRASTRUCTURE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+# CIVICVS Foundation Document
+
+## Document ID
+
+CFD-MI-2025-MEDIA-INFRASTRUCTURE
+
+---
+
+## Title
+
+Media Infrastructure: Preservation, Fragility, and Civic Value
+
+---
+
+## Category
+
+**Foundation Exemplar** — Media Infrastructure (MI) as Civic Artifact
+
+---
+
+## Purpose
+
+To establish **Media Infrastructure (MI)** as a civic category within CIVICVS.
+
+Civic artifacts do not exist in a vacuum; their **durability and legitimacy depend on the medium** in which they are created, transmitted, and preserved. This document provides a stable taxonomy for analysts to classify artifacts according to their media infrastructure, and prescribes civic rules for handling each type.
+
+---
+
+## Media Infrastructure Types
+
+### 1. **Print Media**
+
+* **Examples:** Books, newspapers, journals, printed emails.
+* **Civic Value:** Highest permanence. When archived, print is immutable by origin.
+* **Forensic Note:** Alterations are always detectable under forensic analysis.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Print evidence is preferred whenever available.
+
+---
+
+### 2. **Proprietary Audio/Video**
+
+* **Examples:** Encrypted streaming, DRM formats, closed-platform video/audio.
+* **Civic Value:** Low. Primary purpose is profit by concealment; content is irrelevant to publisher.
+* **Civic Risk:** Fragile, mutable, inaccessible; can be revoked or altered at any time.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Must not enter the civic evidence stream.
+
+---
+
+### 3. **Centralized Platforms**
+
+* **Examples:** Twitter/X, Facebook, YouTube.
+* **Civic Value:** Moderate, but inherently fragile.
+* **Civic Risk:** Not moderation, but **censorship**; content is mutable and controlled by platform owners.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Archive immediately; never rely on live-state availability.
+
+---
+
+### 4. **Decentralized Protocols**
+
+* **Examples:** ActivityPub (Mastodon), Diaspora, Zot/ZAP.
+* **Civic Value:** High resilience due to distributed preservation.
+* **Special Note:** Zot/ZAP’s nomadic identities and migrations make it the most reliable for independence and anonymity.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Favor decentralized protocols when sourcing civic artifacts.
+
+---
+
+### 5. **Owner-Operated Forums**
+
+* **Examples:** Personal blogs, self-hosted sites, independent boards.
+* **Civic Value:** True **Free Speech platforms** — not censorable by third parties.
+* **Civic Risk:** Fragile, dependent on individual maintenance.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Archive comprehensively; value lies in autonomy, not permanence.
+
+---
+
+### 6. **Private Networks**
+
+* **Examples:** Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, closed groups.
+* **Civic Value:** Limited. Provide balkanized discourse silos.
+* **Civic Risk:** Semi-closed, easily erased, poor for rational civic record.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Treat artifacts here as ephemeral and incomplete.
+
+---
+
+### 7. **Routing Protocols & Distributed Storage**
+
+* **Examples:** VPN, Tor, IP-less routing, IPFS, blockchains.
+* **Civic Value:** The **future infrastructure** of civic independence.
+* **Civic Risk:** Provenance complexity; anonymity can weaken verification.
+* **Analyst Rule:** Strong for durability (IPFS/blockchains), but provenance must be double-anchored (timestamps, signatures).
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Notes
+
+* **Durability vs. Provenance:** Analysts must weigh whether a medium preserves permanence or enables forgery.
+* **Profit vs. Civic Purpose:** Proprietary technologies are built for profit, not truth — and thus degrade civic value.
+* **Free Speech vs. Fragility:** Owner-operated forums are fragile but vital as civic speech environments.
+* **Future Potential:** Distributed protocols (IPFS, blockchains, Tor) offer pathways for a permanent civic infrastructure, though provenance standards remain essential.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+By classifying **media infrastructure** as a Foundation category, CIVICVS ensures that analysts always account for the **medium of preservation** as part of artifact legitimacy.
+
+* Print remains the gold standard.
+* Proprietary media must be excluded.
+* Decentralized and distributed protocols represent the civic future.
+* Centralized platforms and private networks are fragile and censorable, requiring immediate archiving.
+
+---
+
+✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
+**Category Established:** Media Infrastructure (MI).
+

docs/CIVICVS Artifact Entry CFD-OG-2025-ORGANIZATIONAL-GUISE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Here is the **updated Foundation Document** for **Organizational Guise (OG)**, now expanded with its three subtypes and exemplars.
+
+---
+
+# CIVICVS Foundation Document
+
+## Document ID
+
+CFD-OG-2025-ORGANIZATIONAL-GUISE
+
+---
+
+## Title
+
+Organizational Guise: Misalignment Between Claimed Purpose and Actual Output
+
+---
+
+## Category
+
+**Foundation Exemplar** — Organizational Guise (OG) as Civic Artifact
+
+---
+
+## Purpose
+
+To establish **Organizational Guise (OG)** as a civic artifact category within CIVICVS.
+
+An Organizational Guise exists when an institution presents itself as serving the public good — through healthcare, justice, equity, aid, community governance, or information neutrality — but its preserved artifacts (funding, filings, outputs) demonstrate misalignment between **claimed purpose** and **actual activity**.
+
+---
+
+## Subtypes and Exemplars
+
+### 1. **Facade NGOs**
+
+Organizations cloaked in moral rhetoric, but delivering outputs misaligned with their stated missions.
+
+* **Exemplar A:** Planned Parenthood — Claims to provide “healthcare” and “reproductive services” but overwhelmingly delivers abortion services, with minimal diversification.
+* **Exemplar B:** Black Lives Matter — Claims to advance Black communities, but financial audits and investigations reveal funds directed toward political agendas, personal enrichment, or unrelated causes.
+
+---
+
+### 2. **Pseudo-Governments**
+
+Private organizations exercising **government-like powers** over populations without civic legitimacy or safeguards.
+
+* **Exemplar C:** Homeowners Associations (HOAs) — Present as community governance entities, but are often staffed by unqualified individuals making life-altering decisions (fines, liens, foreclosures) with no due process protections.
+
+---
+
+### 3. **State-Subsidized Guise**
+
+Publicly funded entities presenting themselves as neutral or nonpartisan civic services, but functioning as partisan or agenda-driven outlets.
+
+* **Exemplar D:** National Public Radio (NPR) — Claims to be neutral, taxpayer-funded public broadcasting, but demonstrably aligns with selective narratives and advocacy, undermining its civic neutrality.
+
+---
+
+## Known Immutable Processes & Records
+
+* **Financial Records:** IRS Form 990, audits, tax filings, congressional appropriations.
+* **Governance Records:** Board structures, charters, bylaws, covenants.
+* **Mission Statements:** Websites, press releases, annual reports.
+* **Outputs:** Documented services rendered, or absence thereof.
+* **Legal Proceedings:** Court filings, regulatory challenges, or litigation outcomes.
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Rules
+
+* **Dual Ledger:** Always preserve both the *claimed purpose* (mission statements, branding) and the *actual outputs* (filings, audits, services).
+* **Immutable Anchors:** Financial filings and governance documents are Tier-1 evidence.
+* **Subtype Classification:** Assign every OG artifact to one of the three subtypes:
+
+  * *Facade NGO*
+  * *Pseudo-Government*
+  * *State-Subsidized Guise*
+* **Moral vs. Ethical Test:** If moral rhetoric dominates while verifiable service/output is lacking, classify as OG.
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Notes
+
+* **Civic Significance:** OG entities represent a systemic civic hazard — institutions cloaked in legitimacy but producing little or no alignment with their declared mission.
+* **Civic Risk:** Misaligned organizations absorb funds, legitimacy, and trust meant for authentic civic needs.
+* **Civic Value:** Documenting OGs as artifacts strips away moral posture and restores ethical evaluation grounded in immutable records.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+The **Organizational Guise** category exposes institutions that disguise political, financial, or coercive agendas under the veneer of civic service.
+
+By structuring OG into three subtypes with exemplars, CIVICVS ensures future analysts can:
+
+* Detect guises systematically.
+* Preserve both claims and counter-artifacts.
+* Expose the ethical failure when organizational branding replaces verifiable civic service.
+
+---
+
+✅ **Status:** Foundation Document updated.
+**Category Established:** Organizational Guise (OG), with three subtypes — Facade NGOs, Pseudo-Governments, State-Subsidized Guise.
+

docs/CIVICVS Context Dossier CFD-CTX-2015-2024-HARVARD-DEI-POLICY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# CIVICVS Foundation Document
+
+## Document ID
+
+CFD-CTX-2015-2024-HARVARD-DEI-POLICY
+
+---
+
+## Title
+
+Context Dossier Exemplar: Harvard University Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Policy (2015–2024)
+
+---
+
+## Category
+
+**Foundation Exemplar** — Context Dossier (CTX) as Civic Artifact
+
+---
+
+## Purpose
+
+To establish the **Context Dossier (CTX)** as a civic artifact category.
+
+A Context Dossier does not isolate a single artifact but instead preserves an **environment of processes and records that necessarily exist**: policies, admissions data, governance structures, legal rulings, and funding disclosures.
+
+This document formalizes how CIVICVS records institutional contexts: by identifying the permanent processes that define them and mapping the civic disputes (claims vs. counterclaims) that arise.
+
+---
+
+## Case Description
+
+From 2015 to 2024, Harvard University maintained and evolved policies framed under **Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)**.
+
+These policies were expressed in governance offices (OEDIB, Belonging & Inclusion initiatives), public admissions messaging, funding allocations, and court litigation (*Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard*, 2023).
+
+* **Tier-1 (Immutable by Origin):** Admissions records, governance structures, financial disclosures, court rulings.
+* **Tier-2 (Constructed Context):** Comparative timelines of mission statements, policy renamings, legal commentary, statistical outcome analyses.
+
+---
+
+## Known Immutable Processes & Records
+
+* **Admissions Records:** Universities are required to track demographic categories and admissions outcomes.
+* **Funding and Tax Disclosures:** DEI offices require budgets and appear in institutional financial reporting.
+* **Governance Records:** Charters, organizational charts, and office renamings are formally recorded.
+* **Legal Records:** *Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard* (2023) produced a binding Supreme Court ruling.
+* **Policy Documentation:** Mission statements and program descriptions preserved in university announcements.
+
+---
+
+## Claims and Counterclaims
+
+| Claim                                                                  | Counterclaim                                                                           | Civic Status                                          |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
+| DEI ensured equal opportunity by correcting for structural inequities. | DEI created discrimination by enforcing equal outcomes over merit-based standards.     | **Unresolved**; ongoing ideological dispute.          |
+| Race-conscious admissions were lawful and necessary.                   | Supreme Court ruled such policies unconstitutional in 2023.                            | **Resolved** in law; disputed in political discourse. |
+| DEI strengthened community belonging and anti-racism initiatives.      | Critics argue DEI institutionalized ideology, not ethics, lowering academic standards. | **Ongoing**; tracked via governance changes.          |
+
+---
+
+## Analyst Notes
+
+* **Civic Significance:** Demonstrates how moral narratives (“equity”) can supplant ethical protocols (equal opportunity).
+* **Civic Risk:** DEI illustrates systemic risk: when moral framing overrides civic ethics, public trust erodes.
+* **Civic Value:** The dossier preserves **processes, not opinions**. Analysts can always return to admissions records, funding disclosures, and court rulings as immutable anchors.
+
+---
+
+## Civic Consequence
+
+This dossier establishes the **Context Dossier (CTX)** category: a tool for preserving not one artifact, but an **entire environment** of processes, disputes, and structural records.
+
+The Harvard DEI dossier demonstrates that civic legitimacy requires examining policy not through ideology, but through **immutable records** (funding, admissions, governance, law).
+
+---
+
+✅ **Status:** Foundation Document filed.
+**Category Established:** Context Dossier (CTX).
+