foundation/docs/10_Principle_Closed_Records.md

2.6 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Principle — Closed Records

Definition

A closed record is the complete and final body of evidence left by a deceased individual. No new actions, clarifications, or defenses will ever be added. For the Civic Analyst, this immutability creates both an opportunity and an ethical obligation.


Why Closed Records Matter

  1. Immutability of Evidence

    • Contributions are finite and cannot evolve further.
    • Every statement, action, and institution built remains as the permanent civic record.
  2. Framing Integrity

    • Because the subject cannot defend themselves, analysts must present evidence transparently.
    • Selective framing can distort legacy — for good or ill — without possibility of correction.
  3. Resistance to Exploitation

    • Once an individual is deceased, narratives may be weaponized.
    • Media, adversaries, or allies may attempt to rewrite history for their own ends.
    • The Civic Analysts duty is to resist distortion by preserving and presenting the record faithfully.

Case Example: Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk is no longer alive. His civic record is closed.

  • The BBC profile (“How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally”) illustrates how framing continues after death:

    • Highlighting credentialism (“college dropout”).
    • Labeling political identity (“hard-right Trump loyalist”).
    • Casting critique of Islam as bigotry.
  • These framings shape legacy without the subjects ability to respond.

  • The Civic Analyst must therefore separate evidence from narrative, measuring only the civic consequences of Kirks actions and institutions.

Source: Bernd Debusmann Jr. & Mike Wendling. “How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally.” BBC News, 13 September 2025. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33r4kjez6no (Local copy preserved in this repo as Charlie Kirk_ How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally.pdf). Accessed 13 September 2025, 6:53 AM (UTC-5).


Analysts Responsibility

  • Treat closed records as fixed evidence sets.
  • Make reasoning transparent: explain why certain evidence is emphasized.
  • Ensure fidelity to the record, even when critical.
  • Recognize that once published, the analysis itself becomes part of the closed civic archive.

Closing Declaration

This principle establishes how Civic Analysts treat the records of deceased figures: as immutable evidence requiring transparency, fairness, and resistance to exploitation.

It will not be revised. Any future improvement must come from new analyses published by other Civic Analysts.