79 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
79 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
# OPT — CIVICVS Framework — Consolidated Summary.md
|
||
|
||
*Optional consolidated overview of all 12 civic artifacts and their clarified usage.*
|
||
*This file may be adapted by each Civic Analyst. Some may choose to use it as a checklist of what artifacts appear in a text, while others may invert it — analyzing which artifacts are absent or irrelevant.*
|
||
*Not every LLM will require this file; it is provided as a flexible orientation aid.*
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🌐 CIVICVS Framework — Consolidated Summary
|
||
|
||
### Core Principle
|
||
CIVICVS is a **public ledger of civic artifacts** — textual and narrative fragments preserved not for their decoration but for their role in shaping civic memory. It refuses to fight narrative with narrative. Instead, it anchors public discourse to **auditable records** that endure beyond distortion, omission, or manipulation.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### The Twelve Civic Artifacts
|
||
1. **Title** – Anchor of framing.
|
||
2. **Subtitle** – Compression of complexity into a single thrust.
|
||
3. **Pull-quote** – Selective amplification.
|
||
4. **Section header** – Silent segmentation of cognition.
|
||
5. **Timeline phrase** – Narrative glue bending chronology.
|
||
6. **Label & credential** – Reputation claims without proof.
|
||
7. **Quotation** – Trimmed, framed, and context-dependent speech.
|
||
8. **Timeline event** – Dated, sourced record restoring causality.
|
||
9. **Entity graph** – Map of actors, donors, organizations, institutions.
|
||
10. **Evidence table** – Ledger of claims, methods, sources.
|
||
11. **Context lens** – Institutional tests (codes, human capital, enforcement).
|
||
12. **Civic consequence** – Societal impact beyond narrative.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Method & Process
|
||
- **Selective first pass**: The LLM proposes only detected artifacts; it does not fill empty slots or cross-link them.
|
||
- **Independent entry points**: Analysts may start with any artifact and ignore others.
|
||
- **Adversarial accumulation**: Analysts may add, attack, or discredit earlier records. Failures remain preserved.
|
||
- **Immutable publishing**: Once pinned to IPFS, a Ledger is authoritative. Drafts are irrelevant.
|
||
- **No canonical versioning**: Each Ledger is unique. Repeated analysis of the same topic is encouraged but never revisions.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Authorship & Responsibility
|
||
- **Human sovereignty**: Analysts alone take credit and responsibility. The LLM is a tool, not a co-author.
|
||
- **Identity**: Analysts may use pen names, but credibility is tied to verifiable Internet identity.
|
||
- **Citizenship rule**: Only natural-born or naturalized citizens may publish Ledgers for their own polity.
|
||
- **One shot per topic**: Analysts cannot defend or revise after publication.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Publication & Persistence
|
||
- **Private phase**: Drafting in Gitea repositories.
|
||
- **Milestone**: Publishing and pinning to IPFS.
|
||
- **Public Ledger**: Immutable, append-only, open to scrutiny.
|
||
- **Survival by pinning**: Discredited or irrelevant Ledgers vanish; widely pinned ones endure.
|
||
- **Institutional anchors**: Libraries and universities may act as long-term pinners.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Limits & Boundaries
|
||
- **No defense, no dialogue**: Analysts publish and step away.
|
||
- **No comparison**: Ledgers stand independently.
|
||
- **No discovery tools**: Persistence is organic, not indexed.
|
||
- **No institutionalization**: CIVICVS is a method and a ledger, not a movement.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## **Closing Declaration**
|
||
|
||
This file may be revised. Any future updates will be based only on **public records widely available**, and only after such phenomena rise above the level of **temporary annoyance** and into the realm of enduring civic consequence.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Purpose
|
||
CIVICVS exists to preserve **civic artifacts as public memory**, beyond the reach of framing, propaganda, or revisionism. Accountability is enforced through:
|
||
- Risked reputation of analysts.
|
||
- Immutability of pinned Ledgers.
|
||
- Accumulated adversarial scrutiny over time.
|
||
|
||
**Truth in CIVICVS does not rely on consensus or confidence scores. It survives by endurance.**
|