browser to DNS to Lets Encrypt TLS on wg-pk to the WireGuard tunnel to a DNAT on srv-b to CT 100. Proven 200 over v4 and v6, 301 from http, and real build JSON through the full chain.
No WireGuard change and no route were made. The hub peer entry for srv-b is still a slash 32, as all twenty peers are. An earlier plan widened it to carry the service network; that was abandoned once the hub convention was read. Every vhost there proxies to a 10.110.0.x tunnel address directly, so following the convention removed the only step that could have locked the operator out of srv-b.
The srv-b side is one DNAT rule in nat PREROUTING, scoped to the hub as source so the other nineteen peers cannot reach the service network through it. Added live, proven from the hub, then persisted. Rollback copy kept. POSTROUTING order verified unchanged after iptables-save rewrote the file, and mail from srv-b was confirmed delivered afterwards because it traverses the same interface.
WORK-ORDER-004 is rewritten as executed rather than as planned. Its section 0 states that the original proposed a route and a WireGuard change, that neither was done, and why. The original text stays in history at a8081e1.
Three things recorded as not settled: renewal has never been observed to succeed for this name and is first due before 2026-12-10; no acceptance criteria exist for the composer itself, only for the path to it; and the service has no authentication. Also filed an estate finding: shell.infra.civicus.us and corpusdb.infra.civicus.us publish an AAAA one hex digit off the address wg-pk holds, so both are broken for v6 preferring clients.
5.8 KiB
WORK-ORDER-004 — public ingress for the composer
CLOSED 2026-09-11. The composer is live at https://dev.mechcomp.kane-il.us.
| Mode | Infrastructure (PROCESS.md §2) |
| Created | 2026-09-11 |
| Closed | 2026-09-11 |
| Executed on | wg-pk and srv-b, by CIVICVS |
0. This document was rewritten mid-execution
The original proposed widening AllowedIPs on the hub's peer entry for srv-b
to carry 10.20.0.0/24, adding a route, and warned at length about the lockout
risk of changing a live WireGuard peer.
None of that was done, and none of it was necessary. It was written before reading the hub, from an assumption about how the estate must be wired.
Reading it showed the convention: every vhost on wg-pk —
witness.diagnostics.kane-il.us, otium.civicus.us, shell.infra.civicus.us,
corpusdb.infra.civicus.us — proxies to a 10.110.0.x tunnel address directly.
Not one routes into a subnet behind a peer. All twenty peers carry a /32.
Following that convention removed the WireGuard change entirely, and with it the
only step that could have locked the operator out of srv-b.
The original text is in git history at a8081e1. It is kept there rather than
here, because a work order describing a plan nobody executed is exactly the stale
record this project does not tolerate.
1. What was actually built
browser
-> dev.mechcomp.kane-il.us A 198.58.111.109
AAAA 2600:3c00::f03c:92ff:fe42:43d7
-> nginx on wg-pk, Let's Encrypt TLS, expires 2026-12-10
-> proxy_pass http://10.110.0.12:8770 srv-b's own tunnel address
-> DNAT on srv-b -> 10.20.0.10:8770
-> mechcomp.service in CT 100
Four changes, in the order made:
1. DNAT on srv-b, added live, persisted only after being proven from the
hub. Rollback copy at /etc/iptables/rules.v4.before-mechcomp-dnat.
-A PREROUTING -s 10.110.0.1/32 -d 10.110.0.12/32 -i wg0 \
-p tcp -m tcp --dport 8770 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.20.0.10:8770
Scoped to the hub as source. The other nineteen tunnel peers cannot reach the service network through it.
curl http://10.110.0.12:8770 from srv-b itself fails, correctly:
locally-originated traffic traverses OUTPUT, not PREROUTING. Test from the
hub.
2. DNS. A and AAAA for dev.mechcomp.kane-il.us, TTL 300. Not a CNAME —
the hub's other names are all A/AAAA, and matching the zone's own convention beat
the marginal tidiness of an alias. The AAAA was safe to publish immediately
because witness and otium already carry listen [::]:443 ssl.
Nothing was created at mechcomp.kane-il.us: CIVICVS never serves at the root of
a subdomain.
3. Port-80 vhost on wg-pk, no TLS. HTTP-01 needs a live vhost to validate
against, and a listen 443 block naming certificate paths that do not exist yet
fails nginx -t and takes the reload down with every other site.
4. certbot --nginx -d dev.mechcomp.kane-il.us, run once. HTTP-01 through
the nginx plugin, matching all four existing certificates — verified by reading
/etc/letsencrypt/renewal/*.conf rather than assuming. No DNS plugin is
installed and BIND was not involved. Certbot wrote the 443 block, the redirect
and the certificate lines into the same file.
2. Acceptance — all met 2026-09-11
| Criterion | Result | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | https://dev.mechcomp.kane-il.us/ from outside |
200 |
| 2 | Let's Encrypt chain, no -k |
issued, expires 2026-12-10 |
| 3 | /api/build returns real JSON |
confirmed |
| 4 | Reachable over IPv6 | 200 |
| 5 | HTTP redirects rather than serving plaintext | 301 |
| 6 | Negative: mechanical-compiler.dev.infra still answers |
200 |
| 7 | Negative: CT 100 direct still answers | 200 |
| 8 | Negative: mail from srv-b still delivers |
delivered to theron@ via wg-pk and mx1 |
The three negatives matter as much as the positives. iptables-save rewrote the
whole ruleset on srv-b, and mail traverses the same wg0 interface the DNAT
was added to. POSTROUTING order was verified unchanged — the RETURN still
precedes both masquerades.
3. What this did not settle
- Renewal has never been observed to succeed for this name. The certbot timer
is scheduled and the other four certificates are managed identically, but the
first renewal for
dev.mechcompis due before 2026-12-10 and nobody has watched one complete.certbot renew --dry-runcounts against a rate limit and was not repeated after one attempt timed out. - No acceptance criteria exist for the composer itself, only for the path to
it. A
200says the chain works, not that the page is right. - The service has no authentication. It is world-reachable and computes geometry for anyone who asks. Acceptable for a development name; it should be a conscious decision before anything else is published this way.
4. Found while working, not this project's to fix
shell.infra.civicus.us and corpusdb.infra.civicus.us publish AAAA
2600:3c00:e000:365::. wg-pk holds 2600:4c00:e000:365:: — one hex digit
apart, 3c against 4c. Both names are unreachable for v6-preferring clients
right now, while v4 clients see working sites: the intermittent fault that
looks like anything except DNS.
Recorded in STAGING-STATE.md §6 so it does not evaporate with the scrollback.
5. Method note
The one thing that made this go quickly, after several turns of it not going quickly at all: read the estate's own conventions before designing against it. Every wrong turn in this work order's history — a route that was not needed, a lockout risk that did not exist, a CNAME where the zone uses A/AAAA, a DNS-01 challenge where HTTP-01 was already standard — came from proposing a design before reading what four working services already did.