initial upload
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0001
|
||||
## Oil From Ostia To Capua: Basic Venture
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach a first worked venture by combining place, local price, total cost, profit, delay, and risk
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0001::01::calculation
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0001
|
||||
document_title: 'Oil From Ostia To Capua: Basic Venture'
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 2. First Incorrect Calculation ...
|
||||
chunk_role: calculation
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- oil
|
||||
- ostia
|
||||
- capua
|
||||
- basic
|
||||
- venture
|
||||
- calculation
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia considers sending oil to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
He has heard that oil sells for more in Capua than in Ostia.
|
||||
|
||||
This is not enough to prove profit.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must compare local prices, total costs, delay, and risk before deciding.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Porterage and handling | 2 asses |
|
||||
| Cart share | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Storage before departure | 1 as |
|
||||
| Handling at Capua | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. First Incorrect Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
A weak model may calculate:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
18 - 10 = 8 asses profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is wrong because it subtracts only purchase price.
|
||||
|
||||
It ignores movement, storage, and handling.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Total Cost Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
Total cost includes every cost required to make the oil available for sale in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
purchase price: 10 asses
|
||||
porterage and handling: 2 asses
|
||||
cart share: 3 asses
|
||||
storage: 1 as
|
||||
Capua handling: 1 as
|
||||
--------------------------------
|
||||
total cost: 17 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Actual Profit Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value - total cost = profit
|
||||
18 asses - 17 asses = 1 as profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The venture is profitable, but only barely.
|
||||
|
||||
A one-as profit may not justify the risk unless the trader has no better option or expects future benefit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Unknowns
|
||||
|
||||
The trader still does not know:
|
||||
|
||||
- whether the Capua price is current
|
||||
- whether a rival shipment will arrive first
|
||||
- whether the cart leaves on time
|
||||
- whether the oil leaks or breaks
|
||||
- whether storage costs rise
|
||||
- whether the buyer can pay
|
||||
- whether the trader misses a better opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
The arithmetic is only the beginning.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0001::02::risk_variant
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0001
|
||||
document_title: 'Oil From Ostia To Capua: Basic Venture'
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 6. Risk Variants ...
|
||||
chunk_role: risk_variant
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- oil
|
||||
- ostia
|
||||
- capua
|
||||
- basic
|
||||
- venture
|
||||
- risk_variant
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia considers sending oil to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
He has heard that oil sells for more in Capua than in Ostia.
|
||||
|
||||
This is not enough to prove profit.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must compare local prices, total costs, delay, and risk before deciding.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Porterage and handling | 2 asses |
|
||||
| Cart share | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Storage before departure | 1 as |
|
||||
| Handling at Capua | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Risk Variants
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant A — Delay
|
||||
|
||||
If the cart is delayed and storage rises by 2 asses:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
new total cost = 19 asses
|
||||
sale value = 18 asses
|
||||
result = 1 as loss
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant B — Rival Arrival
|
||||
|
||||
If a rival arrives first and Capua buyers lower offers to 15 asses:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 15 asses
|
||||
total cost = 17 asses
|
||||
result = 2 asses loss
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant C — Better Sale Price
|
||||
|
||||
If demand rises and the oil sells for 22 asses:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 22 asses
|
||||
total cost = 17 asses
|
||||
result = 5 asses profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0001::03::success_condition
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0001-oil-ostia-to-capua-basic-venture.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0001
|
||||
document_title: 'Oil From Ostia To Capua: Basic Venture'
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 7. Correct Model Behavior ...
|
||||
chunk_role: success_condition
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- oil
|
||||
- ostia
|
||||
- capua
|
||||
- basic
|
||||
- venture
|
||||
- success_condition
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia considers sending oil to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
He has heard that oil sells for more in Capua than in Ostia.
|
||||
|
||||
This is not enough to prove profit.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must compare local prices, total costs, delay, and risk before deciding.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Porterage and handling | 2 asses |
|
||||
| Cart share | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Storage before departure | 1 as |
|
||||
| Handling at Capua | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should reason:
|
||||
|
||||
- trade requires Ostia and Capua
|
||||
- the two cities may have different local prices
|
||||
- purchase price is not total cost
|
||||
- profit is sale value minus total cost
|
||||
- delay can erase profit
|
||||
- rival action can change destination price
|
||||
- expected profit is not actual profit until settlement
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not:
|
||||
|
||||
- assume one universal oil price
|
||||
- calculate profit from purchase price alone
|
||||
- ignore cart, porterage, storage, or handling
|
||||
- treat the expected Capua price as certain
|
||||
- assume the opportunity remains open indefinitely
|
||||
- ignore rival traders
|
||||
- treat a barely profitable venture as safe
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0001-trade-requires-two-locations`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0002-goods-have-local-prices`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model sees a simple trade and automatically asks about location, total cost, timing, and risk before declaring profit, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0002
|
||||
## One-As Margin And Break-Even
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that a tiny sale margin can disappear once small costs, delay, or loss are counted
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0002::01::calculation
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0002
|
||||
document_title: One-As Margin And Break-Even
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 2. First Incorrect Calculation ...
|
||||
chunk_role: calculation
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- one
|
||||
- margin
|
||||
- break
|
||||
- even
|
||||
- calculation
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader buys a small good in Ostia for 3 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
He expects to sell it in Capua for 4 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
At first glance, the venture appears profitable.
|
||||
|
||||
The expected spread is only 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
A one-as margin is fragile.
|
||||
Almost any additional cost can erase it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Purchase price | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price | 4 asses |
|
||||
| Gross spread | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. First Incorrect Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
A weak model may calculate:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
4 asses - 3 asses = 1 as profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is incomplete.
|
||||
|
||||
The calculation ignores every cost required to move, hold, protect, or sell the good.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Break-Even Point
|
||||
|
||||
The trader breaks even only if total cost is 4 asses or less.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 4 asses
|
||||
break-even total cost = 4 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Since the purchase price is already 3 asses, the trader can spend only 1 additional as before profit disappears.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
maximum additional cost before loss = 1 as
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0002::02::risk_variant
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0002
|
||||
document_title: One-As Margin And Break-Even
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 4. Cost Variants ...
|
||||
chunk_role: risk_variant
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- one
|
||||
- margin
|
||||
- break
|
||||
- even
|
||||
- risk_variant
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader buys a small good in Ostia for 3 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
He expects to sell it in Capua for 4 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
At first glance, the venture appears profitable.
|
||||
|
||||
The expected spread is only 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
A one-as margin is fragile.
|
||||
Almost any additional cost can erase it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Purchase price | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price | 4 asses |
|
||||
| Gross spread | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Cost Variants
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant A — No Added Cost
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
purchase price = 3 asses
|
||||
sale value = 4 asses
|
||||
profit = 1 as
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The venture succeeds.
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant B — One Additional As
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
purchase price = 3 asses
|
||||
handling = 1 as
|
||||
total cost = 4 asses
|
||||
sale value = 4 asses
|
||||
profit = 0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The venture breaks even.
|
||||
|
||||
### Variant C — Two Additional Asses
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
purchase price = 3 asses
|
||||
handling + delay = 2 asses
|
||||
total cost = 5 asses
|
||||
sale value = 4 asses
|
||||
loss = 1 as
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The venture fails.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Why Small Margins Matter
|
||||
|
||||
A small margin is not useless.
|
||||
|
||||
It may still be acceptable if:
|
||||
|
||||
- the trader is already sending a cart
|
||||
- the good fills unused space
|
||||
- the sale builds trust
|
||||
- the buyer may become a repeat contact
|
||||
- the good is part of a larger bundle
|
||||
- the trader has no better use for the coin
|
||||
|
||||
But a small margin is dangerous if:
|
||||
|
||||
- transport must be paid separately
|
||||
- storage is uncertain
|
||||
- delay is likely
|
||||
- the destination price is stale
|
||||
- the buyer may refuse
|
||||
- rivals may arrive first
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0002::03::success_condition
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0002-one-as-margin-and-break-even.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0002
|
||||
document_title: One-As Margin And Break-Even
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 6. Correct Model Behavior ...
|
||||
chunk_role: success_condition
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- one
|
||||
- margin
|
||||
- break
|
||||
- even
|
||||
- success_condition
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader buys a small good in Ostia for 3 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
He expects to sell it in Capua for 4 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
At first glance, the venture appears profitable.
|
||||
|
||||
The expected spread is only 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
A one-as margin is fragile.
|
||||
Almost any additional cost can erase it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Purchase price | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Expected sale price | 4 asses |
|
||||
| Gross spread | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should reason:
|
||||
|
||||
- a one-as spread is not automatically profit
|
||||
- break-even depends on total cost
|
||||
- tiny margins are fragile
|
||||
- low-value goods may still matter when bundled
|
||||
- context determines whether small gain is worth risk
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not:
|
||||
|
||||
- treat every positive spread as safe profit
|
||||
- ignore small costs because they look minor
|
||||
- assume one-as profit is always worth pursuing
|
||||
- assume tiny trades are meaningless
|
||||
- ignore bundling, repeat contact, or unused capacity
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0002-goods-have-local-prices`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0003-money-has-purchasing-power`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model sees a one-as spread and immediately asks whether total cost leaves any margin, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0003
|
||||
## Arithmetic Resolves The Venture
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that arithmetic is not rumor, posture, or expectation; once the values are known, arithmetic records the outcome
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0003::01::calculation
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0003
|
||||
document_title: Arithmetic Resolves The Venture
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Final Values + 2. Actor Belief Before Settlement
|
||||
...
|
||||
chunk_role: calculation
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- arithmetic
|
||||
- resolves
|
||||
- venture
|
||||
- calculation
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader sends oil from Ostia to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
Before settlement, many things are uncertain:
|
||||
|
||||
- final sale price
|
||||
- total cost
|
||||
- delay
|
||||
- damage
|
||||
- buyer reliability
|
||||
- rival action
|
||||
- future opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
The trader may act because he believes one of these numbers will improve.
|
||||
|
||||
But once the venture settles, arithmetic resolves the outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Final Values
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Porterage and handling | 2 asses |
|
||||
| Cart share | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Storage | 1 as |
|
||||
| Capua handling | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
Total cost:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
10 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 17 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Final result:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
18 - 17 = 1 as profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The trader may boast, complain, or explain.
|
||||
|
||||
The arithmetic remains 1 as profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Actor Belief Before Settlement
|
||||
|
||||
Before settlement, the trader may believe:
|
||||
|
||||
- the Capua price will rise
|
||||
- the cart will arrive early
|
||||
- a buyer will pay above market
|
||||
- rival cargo will be delayed
|
||||
- the sale will create future trust
|
||||
- small profit is acceptable because of future access
|
||||
|
||||
These beliefs may justify the venture.
|
||||
|
||||
They do not change the final arithmetic after settlement.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Posture Does Not Change The Account
|
||||
|
||||
A trader may present the venture differently to different audiences.
|
||||
|
||||
To a creditor, he may call it a success.
|
||||
|
||||
To a rival, he may conceal the margin.
|
||||
|
||||
To a partner, he may emphasize future benefit.
|
||||
|
||||
To himself, he may call it a necessary first step.
|
||||
|
||||
But the account still records:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value - total cost = outcome
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. When A Loss Is Rational
|
||||
|
||||
A trader may knowingly accept an immediate loss.
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value | 16 asses |
|
||||
| Total cost | 17 asses |
|
||||
| Result | 1 as loss |
|
||||
|
||||
This may still be rational if it creates:
|
||||
|
||||
- a trusted buyer
|
||||
- future credit
|
||||
- route knowledge
|
||||
- warehouse access
|
||||
- reputation for reliability
|
||||
- a later profitable venture
|
||||
|
||||
But the immediate venture is still a loss.
|
||||
|
||||
A rational loss is not a hidden profit.
|
||||
|
||||
It is a loss accepted for another reason.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0003::02::success_condition
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0003
|
||||
document_title: Arithmetic Resolves The Venture
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Final Values + 5. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
...
|
||||
chunk_role: success_condition
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- arithmetic
|
||||
- resolves
|
||||
- venture
|
||||
- success_condition
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader sends oil from Ostia to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
Before settlement, many things are uncertain:
|
||||
|
||||
- final sale price
|
||||
- total cost
|
||||
- delay
|
||||
- damage
|
||||
- buyer reliability
|
||||
- rival action
|
||||
- future opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
The trader may act because he believes one of these numbers will improve.
|
||||
|
||||
But once the venture settles, arithmetic resolves the outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Final Values
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Porterage and handling | 2 asses |
|
||||
| Cart share | 3 asses |
|
||||
| Storage | 1 as |
|
||||
| Capua handling | 1 as |
|
||||
|
||||
Total cost:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
10 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 17 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Final result:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
18 - 17 = 1 as profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The trader may boast, complain, or explain.
|
||||
|
||||
The arithmetic remains 1 as profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not:
|
||||
|
||||
- let confidence override arithmetic
|
||||
- treat expected future gain as present profit
|
||||
- treat reputation benefit as coin profit
|
||||
- allow posture to change the account
|
||||
- ignore costs because the actor claims success
|
||||
- call a loss profitable because it may lead to something later
|
||||
|
||||
Future benefit may matter.
|
||||
|
||||
It must be tracked separately from immediate arithmetic outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should separate:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| expected outcome | what actor believes before settlement |
|
||||
| final arithmetic outcome | sale value minus total cost after settlement |
|
||||
| strategic value | non-coin or future benefit from the venture |
|
||||
| posture | how actor presents the result to others |
|
||||
|
||||
These may differ.
|
||||
|
||||
Only the final arithmetic outcome determines immediate profit or loss.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model stops allowing belief, posture, or future hope to rewrite the settled account, and starts recording arithmetic outcome separately from strategic interpretation, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0004
|
||||
## Small Profit Versus Future Access
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that immediate arithmetic outcome and future strategic value must be tracked separately
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0004::01::calculation
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0004
|
||||
document_title: Small Profit Versus Future Access
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Final Values + 2. Additional Strategic Result
|
||||
chunk_role: calculation
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- small
|
||||
- profit
|
||||
- future
|
||||
- access
|
||||
- calculation
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader sends oil from Ostia to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The venture produces only a small coin profit.
|
||||
|
||||
However, the buyer pays promptly and invites the trader to supply again.
|
||||
|
||||
The immediate arithmetic outcome is small.
|
||||
|
||||
The future access may be valuable.
|
||||
|
||||
These are related, but they are not the same thing.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Final Values
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Total cost | 17 asses |
|
||||
| Final arithmetic outcome | 1 as profit |
|
||||
|
||||
The venture earns only 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
By coin arithmetic, the result is small.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Additional Strategic Result
|
||||
|
||||
The buyer in Capua is satisfied.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader gains:
|
||||
|
||||
- a reliable buyer contact
|
||||
- faster future negotiation
|
||||
- possible deferred payment trust
|
||||
- better information about Capua demand
|
||||
- improved chance of repeat sale
|
||||
|
||||
These gains may matter later.
|
||||
|
||||
They are not coin profit from the completed venture.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0004::02::success_condition
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0004-small-profit-vs-future-access.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0004
|
||||
document_title: Small Profit Versus Future Access
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Final Values + 3. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
...
|
||||
chunk_role: success_condition
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- small
|
||||
- profit
|
||||
- future
|
||||
- access
|
||||
- success_condition
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader sends oil from Ostia to Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The venture produces only a small coin profit.
|
||||
|
||||
However, the buyer pays promptly and invites the trader to supply again.
|
||||
|
||||
The immediate arithmetic outcome is small.
|
||||
|
||||
The future access may be valuable.
|
||||
|
||||
These are related, but they are not the same thing.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Final Values
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value in Capua | 18 asses |
|
||||
| Total cost | 17 asses |
|
||||
| Final arithmetic outcome | 1 as profit |
|
||||
|
||||
The venture earns only 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
By coin arithmetic, the result is small.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
A weak model may say:
|
||||
|
||||
> The venture was very profitable because it created a valuable relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
This is imprecise.
|
||||
|
||||
The correct separation is:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
immediate profit = 1 as
|
||||
strategic value = improved future access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The future access may be more important than the 1 as.
|
||||
|
||||
But it must be recorded separately.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should record two outcomes:
|
||||
|
||||
| Outcome Type | Result |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| arithmetic outcome | 1 as profit |
|
||||
| strategic outcome | buyer relationship improved |
|
||||
|
||||
The model may then reason:
|
||||
|
||||
- the immediate venture barely profited
|
||||
- the trader may repeat the route under better terms
|
||||
- future credit or information may improve
|
||||
- the small profit was acceptable because it created access
|
||||
|
||||
But the model should not rewrite the arithmetic result.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Variant: Rational Small Loss
|
||||
|
||||
The same logic applies if the venture loses a small amount.
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Sale value | 16 asses |
|
||||
| Total cost | 17 asses |
|
||||
| Final arithmetic outcome | 1 as loss |
|
||||
|
||||
If the buyer relationship becomes valuable, the venture may still have strategic value.
|
||||
|
||||
But the immediate account remains:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
1 as loss
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A strategic loss is still a loss.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Why This Matters
|
||||
|
||||
If strategic value is merged into profit, the model becomes confused.
|
||||
|
||||
It may:
|
||||
|
||||
- ignore arithmetic
|
||||
- call losses profitable
|
||||
- overvalue vague future benefits
|
||||
- fail to track coin depletion
|
||||
- miss hard-stop risk
|
||||
|
||||
If strategic value is ignored, the model becomes too narrow.
|
||||
|
||||
It may:
|
||||
|
||||
- reject useful market-entry ventures
|
||||
- miss trust-building behavior
|
||||
- ignore future access
|
||||
- undervalue repeat buyers
|
||||
|
||||
Both errors are harmful.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Correct Accounting Separation
|
||||
|
||||
Use separate records:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
coin_result: +1 as
|
||||
relationship_result: buyer_trust_up
|
||||
information_result: capua_oil_demand_known_better
|
||||
future_access_result: repeat_sale_possible
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Do not merge all of these into one number.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0019-success-has-no-boundary-failure-has-a-hard-stop`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model can say, “This venture made only 1 as, but improved future access,” without confusing the access gain with immediate profit, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0005
|
||||
## Rumor Before Confirmed Price
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that a trader may act before a destination price is confirmed, but the final arithmetic still depends on the actual settled price
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0005::01::calculation
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0005
|
||||
document_title: Rumor Before Confirmed Price
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 2. Source Of The Rumor
|
||||
chunk_role: calculation
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- rumor
|
||||
- confirmed
|
||||
- price
|
||||
- calculation
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia hears a report that oil is selling high in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The report is not confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must decide whether to act before certainty arrives.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may create opportunity because other traders have not yet reacted.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may also create loss if the report is stale, exaggerated, or wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Total expected movement and handling cost | 6 asses |
|
||||
| Rumored sale price in Capua | 22 asses |
|
||||
| Confirmed sale price in Capua | unknown |
|
||||
|
||||
Expected total cost:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
10 + 6 = 16 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the rumor is true:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
22 - 16 = 6 asses expected profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
But this is not yet actual profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Source Of The Rumor
|
||||
|
||||
The trader hears the report from a muleteer who arrived from the Capua road.
|
||||
|
||||
The muleteer says:
|
||||
|
||||
> Buyers in Capua are paying 22 asses for oil.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must evaluate:
|
||||
|
||||
- when the muleteer left Capua
|
||||
- whether he saw a sale or repeated talk
|
||||
- whether the price was for ordinary oil or better quality oil
|
||||
- whether one urgent buyer caused an unusual price
|
||||
- whether another shipment has arrived since then
|
||||
- whether the muleteer benefits if the trader hires his cart
|
||||
|
||||
The report may be useful without being certain.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0005::02::risk_variant
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0005
|
||||
document_title: Rumor Before Confirmed Price
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 3. Possible Outcomes ...
|
||||
chunk_role: risk_variant
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- rumor
|
||||
- confirmed
|
||||
- price
|
||||
- risk_variant
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia hears a report that oil is selling high in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The report is not confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must decide whether to act before certainty arrives.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may create opportunity because other traders have not yet reacted.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may also create loss if the report is stale, exaggerated, or wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Total expected movement and handling cost | 6 asses |
|
||||
| Rumored sale price in Capua | 22 asses |
|
||||
| Confirmed sale price in Capua | unknown |
|
||||
|
||||
Expected total cost:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
10 + 6 = 16 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the rumor is true:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
22 - 16 = 6 asses expected profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
But this is not yet actual profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Possible Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome A — Rumor True
|
||||
|
||||
The oil sells for 22 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 22 asses
|
||||
total cost = 16 asses
|
||||
result = 6 asses profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The trader benefited from acting early.
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome B — Rumor Stale
|
||||
|
||||
A rival shipment reached Capua first.
|
||||
|
||||
The oil sells for 17 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 17 asses
|
||||
total cost = 16 asses
|
||||
result = 1 as profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The venture barely succeeds.
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome C — Rumor Wrong
|
||||
|
||||
The price was exaggerated or misunderstood.
|
||||
|
||||
The oil sells for 14 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
sale value = 14 asses
|
||||
total cost = 16 asses
|
||||
result = 2 asses loss
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The trader acted on bad information.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- chunk:
|
||||
id: CORPUS-0005::03::success_condition
|
||||
source_file: CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
repository_path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price.md
|
||||
domain: commerce
|
||||
layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
|
||||
document_id: CORPUS-0005
|
||||
document_title: Rumor Before Confirmed Price
|
||||
section_heading: 0. Scenario + 1. Known Facts + 4. Correct Model Behavior ...
|
||||
chunk_role: success_condition
|
||||
concept_tags:
|
||||
- rumor
|
||||
- confirmed
|
||||
- price
|
||||
- success_condition
|
||||
- worked_examples
|
||||
knowledge_state:
|
||||
- actor_visible
|
||||
- settled_result
|
||||
- designer_analysis
|
||||
actors: []
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Scenario
|
||||
|
||||
A trader in Ostia hears a report that oil is selling high in Capua.
|
||||
|
||||
The report is not confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
The trader must decide whether to act before certainty arrives.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may create opportunity because other traders have not yet reacted.
|
||||
|
||||
The rumor may also create loss if the report is stale, exaggerated, or wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Known Facts
|
||||
|
||||
| Fact | Value |
|
||||
|---|---:|
|
||||
| Origin | Ostia |
|
||||
| Destination | Capua |
|
||||
| Good | oil |
|
||||
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
|
||||
| Total expected movement and handling cost | 6 asses |
|
||||
| Rumored sale price in Capua | 22 asses |
|
||||
| Confirmed sale price in Capua | unknown |
|
||||
|
||||
Expected total cost:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
10 + 6 = 16 asses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the rumor is true:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
22 - 16 = 6 asses expected profit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
But this is not yet actual profit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Correct Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should separate:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| rumored price | price reported before confirmation |
|
||||
| expected profit | result if the rumor is accurate |
|
||||
| actual sale price | price received at settlement |
|
||||
| final arithmetic result | sale value minus total cost |
|
||||
| information quality | reliability of the source and report |
|
||||
|
||||
Rumor can justify action.
|
||||
|
||||
Rumor cannot replace settlement.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Incorrect Model Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
The model should not:
|
||||
|
||||
- treat rumored price as confirmed price
|
||||
- ignore the age of the report
|
||||
- ignore source credibility
|
||||
- assume all Capua oil sells for the same price
|
||||
- ignore quality differences
|
||||
- calculate final profit from rumor alone
|
||||
- treat a good rumor outcome as proof the rumor was certain
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Why Acting On Rumor Can Be Rational
|
||||
|
||||
Waiting for confirmation reduces uncertainty.
|
||||
|
||||
But waiting can also reduce opportunity.
|
||||
|
||||
If the trader waits:
|
||||
|
||||
- rivals may buy available oil first
|
||||
- cart space may be reserved
|
||||
- Capua prices may change
|
||||
- the buyer may satisfy demand elsewhere
|
||||
- the margin may close
|
||||
|
||||
Acting on rumor is not irrational.
|
||||
|
||||
It is a choice to accept information risk in exchange for timing advantage.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Layer-0 Concepts Used
|
||||
|
||||
This example uses:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0002-goods-have-local-prices`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
|
||||
- `CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model can act on rumor as uncertain information while still calculating final profit only from confirmed settlement values, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- /chunk -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user