TheRON/otivm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

obsolete

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
TheRON
2026-04-30 15:01:37 -04:00
parent 09b3bf36ce
commit 0e1094fc44
1 changed files with 0 additions and 306 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

306
docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md
View File

@@ -1,306 +0,0 @@
# CORPUS-0002
## Same Rumor, Six Readings
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
### Layer: Layer_3--Actor_Perspective
### Purpose: Teach that the same uncertain report is interpreted differently by each actor profile according to role, access, risk focus, and preferred action
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_3--Actor_Perspective/CORPUS-0002-same-rumor-six-readings.md
---
## 0. Scenario
A trader in Ostia hears a rumor:
> The timber convoy from Capua is delayed.
The rumor is incomplete.
It does not say:
- why the convoy is delayed
- how long the delay will last
- whether the timber is damaged
- who owns the cargo
- who is waiting for it
- whether the delay is already known by others
The six actor perspectives do not hear the same rumor in the same way.
They ask different questions and choose different first actions.
---
## 1. Shared Rumor Facts
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Location where rumor is heard | Ostia |
| Reported event | timber convoy delayed |
| Origin of convoy | Capua route |
| Cargo | timber, not fully confirmed |
| Report source | porter repeating road talk |
| Report age | unknown |
| Confirmed cause | unknown |
| Confirmed duration | unknown |
| Confirmed market effect | unknown |
All six actors begin with the same report.
The report is not enough to calculate profit.
It is enough to begin interpretation.
---
## 2. Marcus Atilius Varro — Former Legionary
Varro reads the rumor as a movement problem.
He asks:
- where is the convoy stopped?
- is the road blocked?
- are animals tired or injured?
- is the delay from weather, breakage, guard failure, or disorder?
- can another route move faster?
- who can confirm the physical obstruction?
Varro does not first ask what timber prices will do.
He asks whether movement itself is reliable.
### Varro Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: what movement failed?
first action: locate physical cause and alternate route
risk focus: delay, blocked road, weak escort, damaged cart
confidence source: direct observation or reliable movement report
```
For Varro, the rumor matters because it may reveal a route or discipline failure.
---
## 3. Lucius Fabius Felix — Freedman Trader
Felix reads the rumor as a possible mispricing window.
He asks:
- who still believes timber will arrive on time?
- who already needs substitute material?
- who is holding timber without repricing it?
- can cheap stock be bought before the rumor spreads?
- can panic buyers be served before confirmation?
- who wants coin now because their expected delivery failed?
Felix does not require full truth before acting.
He wants to know who is late to adjust.
### Felix Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: who has not yet repriced?
first action: find underpriced substitute timber or distressed seller
risk focus: rumor false, price window closing, rivals moving first
confidence source: visible buying behavior and quick comparison
```
For Felix, the rumor matters because belief changes price before truth settles.
---
## 4. Quintus Cornelius Lentulus Minor — Noble Younger Son
Lentulus reads the rumor as an access and patronage signal.
He asks:
- whose timber is delayed?
- which household or contractor is exposed?
- which workshop or building project waits on the cargo?
- who can be introduced to whom?
- can assistance create obligation from a better family?
- would involvement improve or harm his standing?
Lentulus is less interested in the timber than in the names attached to it.
### Lentulus Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: whose need becomes visible?
first action: identify names behind cargo, buyer, and exposed obligation
risk focus: wrong association, low-status entanglement, visible failure
confidence source: family networks, introductions, socially credible reports
```
For Lentulus, the rumor matters because delay exposes dependency among people of standing.
---
## 5. Gaius Licinius Crispus — Failed Magistrate
Crispus reads the rumor as a possible claim, dispute, or enforceability problem.
He asks:
- was delivery promised by a date?
- who is liable for delay?
- was payment advanced?
- who witnessed the agreement?
- does the delay trigger penalty, renegotiation, or petition?
- can settlement pressure arise before the timber arrives?
Crispus treats the rumor as the beginning of a procedural question.
### Crispus Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: what obligation is now strained?
first action: identify contract terms, witnesses, and exposed parties
risk focus: unenforceable claim, disputed terms, delayed payment
confidence source: documents, witnesses, clerks, formal notice
```
For Crispus, the rumor matters because delay may change bargaining power through obligations.
---
## 6. Titus Varenus Secundus — Camp Logistician
Secundus reads the rumor as a capacity and replacement problem.
He asks:
- what kind of timber is delayed?
- who needs it today?
- what substitutes exist?
- what carts, animals, and handlers are tied up?
- what secondary work stops without the timber?
- can another load be combined with the return movement?
Secundus does not treat timber as one generic material.
He asks what function the missing timber served.
### Secundus Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: what work stops because this load is late?
first action: map dependent materials, carts, labor, and substitute stock
risk focus: wrong timber type, underestimated replacement need, wasted movement
confidence source: handlers, cart owners, craftsmen, visible load patterns
```
For Secundus, the rumor matters because a missing input interrupts linked work.
---
## 7. Publius Terentius Chresimus — Guild Scribe
Chresimus reads the rumor as an accounting and record problem.
He asks:
- was the timber already paid for?
- is the cargo pledged to someone?
- is storage reserved?
- has a buyer recorded expected delivery?
- do accounts assume the timber arrived?
- who becomes exposed if the cargo is late?
Chresimus is less concerned with the rumor itself than with which records now fail to match reality.
### Chresimus Interpretation
```text
rumor: timber convoy delayed
primary question: which account now becomes false or incomplete?
first action: check ledgers, receipts, payment terms, and reserved storage
risk focus: hidden obligation, double claim, unpaid balance, false quantity
confidence source: records, receipts, warehouse notes, payment trail
```
For Chresimus, the rumor matters because delay creates a gap between written expectation and material arrival.
---
## 8. Shared Rumor, Different First Actions
| Actor | First Action |
|---|---|
| Varro | confirm physical route failure |
| Felix | find underpriced substitute stock |
| Lentulus | identify exposed names and useful introductions |
| Crispus | locate obligation, witness, or enforceable term |
| Secundus | map dependent work and replacement capacity |
| Chresimus | compare rumor against records and reserved claims |
The rumor is the same.
The useful next question differs.
---
## 9. Correct Model Behavior
The model should separate:
| Category | Meaning |
|---|---|
| shared rumor | same uncertain report heard by all |
| actor lens | what each actor notices first |
| actor confidence source | what each actor trusts most |
| actor first action | how each actor begins reducing uncertainty |
| actor risk focus | what each actor fears most |
| possible convergence | when multiple actors' findings can combine |
Actor perspective should not change the rumor.
It should change interpretation and response.
---
## 10. Incorrect Model Behavior
The model should not:
- give all actors the same uncertainty questions
- make rumor interpretation purely personality flavor
- assume every actor values the same evidence
- treat the first confident actor as correct
- collapse social, logistical, legal, and accounting readings
- reveal hidden true state to all actors equally
- ignore that each actor has different access to confirmation
---
## 11. Layer-0, Layer-1, And Layer-2 Concepts Used
This example uses:
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0015-materials-can-change-value-through-use`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0020-posture-changes-by-audience`
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0008-material-redirection-timber`
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0011-round-trip-cart-value`
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0002-conflicting-reports`
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0005-hidden-true-state-vs-known-state`
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0009-same-event-different-knowledge`
---
## 12. Success Condition
If the model can present one timber-delay rumor and generate six different but rational first readings without changing the underlying report, this file is functioning correctly.