obsolete

docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md

@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@
-# CORPUS-0011
-## Status Changes Access
-### Status: Training Corpus Seed
-### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
-### Purpose: Teach that markets, officials, credit, and information are not equally accessible to all actors
-### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0011-status-changes-access.md
-
----
-
-## 0. Principle
-
-Status changes access.
-
-Two traders may have the same coin, goods, and plan, but receive different treatment.
-
-Access may depend on:
-
-- reputation
-- family name
-- citizenship
-- prior service
-- occupation
-- patronage
-- literacy
-- witnesses
-- public trust
-- social prejudice
-
-The market is not entered equally by every actor.
-
----
-
-## 1. Roman-Visible Example
-
-A noble younger son asks to speak with a warehouse official.
-
-He is received quickly because his family name carries weight.
-
-A freedman trader asks the same question.
-
-He may wait longer, be asked for proof, or receive less favorable terms.
-
-The information may be the same.
-
-The access is not.
-
----
-
-## 2. Minimal Access Structure
-
-Access depends on at least:
-
-1. actor identity
-2. public reputation
-3. social rank
-4. trusted introductions
-5. legal standing
-6. prior relationships
-7. perceived reliability
-8. the gatekeeper's interests
-
-Access is a relationship, not a universal right.
-
----
-
-## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
-
-Incorrect assumption:
-
-> Any trader can approach the same person, receive the same answer, and make the same deal.
-
-Correction:
-
-> The same request may produce different outcomes depending on who asks, who hears, and what relationship exists between them.
-
----
-
-## 4. Simulation Use
-
-This principle supports:
-
-- auctoritas
-- fama
-- clientela
-- ius_accessus
-- queue priority
-- credit access
-- rumor credibility
-- legal enforceability
-- background asymmetry
-
-The model should not treat every actor as having identical access to people, places, or remedies.
-
----
-
-## 5. Canonical Test
-
-If the model sees:
-
-> The trader asks the official for access to warehouse records.
-
-It must ask:
-
-- who is the trader?
-- what is his reputation?
-- does he have an introduction?
-- does the official benefit by helping him?
-- does his status speed or slow the request?
-- is a witness required?
-- would another actor receive a different answer?
-
-Only then can the action be evaluated.
-
----
-
-## 6. Success Condition
-
-If the model stops treating access as automatic and starts treating access as shaped by status, reputation, and relationships, this file is functioning correctly.