TheRON/otivm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

obsolete

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
TheRON
2026-04-30 15:08:00 -04:00
parent 0f5a7ba507
commit 4906d03e56
1 changed files with 0 additions and 224 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

224
docs/training/corpus/Layer_2--Uncertainty/CORPUS-0007-acting-before-certainty.md
View File

@@ -1,224 +0,0 @@
# CORPUS-0007
## Acting Before Certainty
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
### Layer: Layer_2--Uncertainty
### Purpose: Teach that a trader may rationally act before confirmation when timing advantage outweighs information risk
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_2--Uncertainty/CORPUS-0007-acting-before-certainty.md
---
## 0. Scenario
A trader in Ostia hears an uncertain report that oil prices are rising in Capua.
He cannot confirm the report immediately.
He must choose whether to act now, wait for confirmation, reduce the size of the venture, or ignore the report.
Acting before certainty is risky.
But waiting for certainty may close the opportunity.
---
## 1. Initial Situation
| Fact | Value |
|---|---:|
| Origin | Ostia |
| Destination | Capua |
| Good | oil |
| Purchase price in Ostia | 10 asses |
| Expected total movement cost | 6 asses |
| Rumored sale price in Capua | 24 asses |
| Confirmed sale price | unknown |
| Time required for confirmation | 2 days |
| Rival awareness | possible |
If the rumor is true:
```text
sale value = 24 asses
total cost = 16 asses
expected profit = 8 asses
```
But the sale value is not confirmed.
---
## 2. Choice A — Act Immediately
The trader buys oil and reserves transport now.
Benefits:
- may move before rivals
- may secure cart space before costs rise
- may reach Capua while demand remains high
- may preserve the full margin if the rumor is true
Risks:
- rumor may be wrong
- rumor may be stale
- quality or buyer terms may differ
- final sale price may be lower than expected
Acting immediately preserves timing advantage but accepts information risk.
---
## 3. Choice B — Wait For Confirmation
The trader waits two days for better information.
Benefits:
- greater confidence
- better estimate of sale price
- reduced chance of acting on false report
Risks:
- rivals may act first
- cart space may be reserved
- Ostia purchase price may rise
- Capua demand may be satisfied
- margin may shrink or disappear
Waiting reduces information risk but increases timing risk.
---
## 4. Choice C — Reduce Exposure
The trader sends a smaller cargo or reserves only partial transport.
Benefits:
- participates in possible opportunity
- limits loss if rumor is wrong
- preserves some liquidity
- keeps option open
Risks:
- smaller profit if rumor is true
- partial action may not secure full buyer relationship
- fixed costs may consume margin
Reducing exposure is neither full action nor full waiting.
It is a response to uncertainty.
---
## 5. Outcome Examples
### Outcome A — Immediate Action Succeeds
```text
sale value = 24 asses
total cost = 16 asses
result = 8 asses profit
```
The trader benefited from acting before certainty.
### Outcome B — Immediate Action Fails
```text
sale value = 14 asses
total cost = 16 asses
result = 2 asses loss
```
The trader accepted information risk and lost.
### Outcome C — Waiting Confirms But Closes Margin
After two days, the trader learns the price is real, but rivals moved first.
```text
sale value = 18 asses
total cost = 17 asses
result = 1 as profit
```
Waiting improved knowledge but reduced opportunity.
---
## 6. Correct Model Behavior
The model should compare:
| Factor | Immediate Action | Waiting |
|---|---|---|
| information confidence | lower | higher |
| timing advantage | higher | lower |
| risk of bad report | higher | lower |
| risk of missed opportunity | lower | higher |
| rival exposure | lower | higher |
| margin preservation | possible | uncertain |
Neither choice is automatically correct.
The correct decision depends on margin, confidence, urgency, rivalry, and capacity to absorb loss.
---
## 7. Incorrect Model Behavior
The model should not:
- require certainty before every action
- treat acting on uncertainty as automatically irrational
- treat fast action as always wise
- ignore the cost of waiting
- ignore rival movement during delay
- treat uncertainty as pure randomness
- judge decision quality only by final outcome
A decision can be rational from known evidence and still fail.
A decision can be reckless and still succeed.
---
## 8. Decision Questions
The trader must ask:
- how large is the possible margin?
- how reliable is the report?
- how fast can the market change?
- who else may know?
- what is the cost of being wrong?
- what is the cost of waiting?
- can exposure be reduced?
- can transport or goods be reserved conditionally?
- will failure create a hard stop?
---
## 9. Layer-0 And Layer-1 Concepts Used
This example uses:
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0007-information-arrives-unevenly`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0008-rumor-is-uncertain-information`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
- `Layer_0/CORPUS-0018-rivalry-changes-conditions`
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0003-arithmetic-resolves-the-venture`
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0005-rumor-before-confirmed-price`
- `Layer_1/CORPUS-0010-hard-stop-after-loss`
- `Layer_2/CORPUS-0006-confirmation-has-a-cost`
---
## 10. Success Condition
If the model can recognize that acting before certainty may be rational when timing advantage is valuable, while still preserving information risk and final arithmetic, this file is functioning correctly.