Initial commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
||||
# CORPUS-0006
|
||||
## Delay Is Economic Cost
|
||||
### Status: Training Corpus Seed
|
||||
### Layer: Layer_0--Primitive_Facts
|
||||
### Purpose: Teach that time can create cost even when no coin is visibly paid
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_0--Primitive_Facts/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Principle
|
||||
|
||||
Delay is cost.
|
||||
|
||||
A trader may lose value even when no coin leaves his hand.
|
||||
|
||||
Time can reduce profit by:
|
||||
|
||||
- changing prices
|
||||
- tying up capital
|
||||
- increasing storage cost
|
||||
- increasing spoilage or breakage risk
|
||||
- missing another opportunity
|
||||
- weakening trust
|
||||
- delaying repayment
|
||||
- allowing rivals to act first
|
||||
|
||||
A slow venture can fail even when the purchase and sale prices looked favorable.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Roman-Visible Example
|
||||
|
||||
A trader buys oil in Ostia for 10 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
He expects to sell it in Capua for 18 asses.
|
||||
|
||||
The cart is delayed two days.
|
||||
|
||||
During those two days:
|
||||
|
||||
- storage costs rise
|
||||
- a rival shipment reaches Capua first
|
||||
- the Capua price falls
|
||||
- the trader cannot use the same coin for another venture
|
||||
|
||||
No one has stolen the oil.
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing has visibly changed about the amphora.
|
||||
|
||||
But the venture has become worse.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Minimal Delay Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Delay affects a venture through at least:
|
||||
|
||||
1. time before departure
|
||||
2. travel time
|
||||
3. time waiting for sale
|
||||
4. storage duration
|
||||
5. price movement during waiting
|
||||
6. capital locked during waiting
|
||||
7. reputation effects from late delivery
|
||||
|
||||
Time is not empty.
|
||||
Time acts on value.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Incorrect Modern Assumption
|
||||
|
||||
Incorrect assumption:
|
||||
|
||||
> If the good is not damaged and no new fee is paid, delay costs nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
Correction:
|
||||
|
||||
> Delay can cost value through missed timing, falling prices, tied capital, storage, and lost trust.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Simulation Use
|
||||
|
||||
This principle supports:
|
||||
|
||||
- venture timers
|
||||
- route duration
|
||||
- storage fees
|
||||
- changing destination prices
|
||||
- missed opportunity
|
||||
- contract deadlines
|
||||
- information delay
|
||||
- reputation changes from late fulfillment
|
||||
|
||||
The model should treat time as part of venture accounting.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Canonical Test
|
||||
|
||||
If the model sees:
|
||||
|
||||
> The trader waits three days before sending the goods.
|
||||
|
||||
It must ask:
|
||||
|
||||
- did prices change?
|
||||
- did storage cost increase?
|
||||
- did rivals act first?
|
||||
- did the buyer still need the good?
|
||||
- was capital locked during the wait?
|
||||
- did the delay damage trust?
|
||||
- did a better opportunity expire?
|
||||
|
||||
Only then can the delay be evaluated.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the model stops treating delay as neutral and starts treating time as an economic force, this file is functioning correctly.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user