initial upload
This commit is contained in:
267
docs/scenarios/SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0002.md
Normal file
267
docs/scenarios/SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0002.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
|
||||
# SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0002
|
||||
## The Capuan Timber Yard Fire
|
||||
### Status: Canonical Scenario Seed
|
||||
### Layer: OTIVM (Roman Merchant)
|
||||
### Purpose: Merchant-opportunity scenario driven by destruction of upstream material stock, cascading shortages, and route-constrained arbitrage
|
||||
### Repository Path: docs/scenarios/SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0002.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Design Intent
|
||||
|
||||
Destruction of inputs creates wider cascades than destruction of finished goods.
|
||||
|
||||
A timber yard fire affects construction, transport, agriculture, military logistics, and workshop recovery simultaneously. The participant should learn to think in dependencies rather than headlines.
|
||||
|
||||
This scenario validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- upstream choke-point logic
|
||||
- multi-sector shortage propagation
|
||||
- scenario compounding with 0001
|
||||
- route-constrained NEGOTIVM decisions
|
||||
- state demand distortion
|
||||
- time-sensitive arbitrage
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Canonical Identifier
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Scenario ID | `SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0002` |
|
||||
| Title | The Capuan Timber Yard Fire |
|
||||
| Token | `capuan_timber_yard_fire` |
|
||||
| Domain | merchant |
|
||||
| Repeatable | yes |
|
||||
| Hidden Truth Variants | yes |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Setting
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Primary City | Capua |
|
||||
| Venture Route | Ostia -> Capua |
|
||||
| Site Type | timber seasoning / cutting / fabrication yard |
|
||||
| Stored Stock | planks, beams, wheel timber, handle blanks, wagon parts |
|
||||
| Strategic Context | routine military preparation and contractor demand |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Historical Basis
|
||||
|
||||
Roman Italy required sustained timber flows for:
|
||||
|
||||
- construction
|
||||
- carts and wheels
|
||||
- agricultural implements
|
||||
- scaffolding
|
||||
- river and coastal craft components
|
||||
- military logistics
|
||||
- fuel and charcoal production
|
||||
|
||||
Contractor yards and timber depots plausibly stored seasoned stock for downstream use or onward shipment.
|
||||
|
||||
This scenario is an analogue model, not a claim of a specific recorded Capuan incident.
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence: Medium
|
||||
Sources: Roman logistics scholarship; transport studies; timber demand in antiquity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Visible Event
|
||||
|
||||
Night fire spreads through the Capuan timber yard.
|
||||
|
||||
By sunrise:
|
||||
|
||||
- plank stacks destroyed
|
||||
- beams charred or unusable
|
||||
- wheel stock lost
|
||||
- handle blanks consumed
|
||||
- sheds collapsed
|
||||
- carts trapped or burned
|
||||
- adjacent workshops disrupted
|
||||
- guards report suspicious movement or conflicting stories
|
||||
|
||||
Public cause unresolved.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Hidden Cause Variants
|
||||
|
||||
| Token | Description |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| accidental_fire | lamp, spark, careless storage |
|
||||
| contractor_fraud | debt escape through loss |
|
||||
| rival_arson | competing supplier |
|
||||
| enemy_sabotage | hostile agents |
|
||||
| labor_revenge | wage dispute |
|
||||
| magistrate_pressure | coercive redevelopment |
|
||||
| theft_coverup | crime hidden by fire |
|
||||
|
||||
Signals only. No certainty.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Immediate Effects (0–7 days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Effect | Direction |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| available timber stock | down |
|
||||
| carpentry throughput | down |
|
||||
| wheelwright capacity | down |
|
||||
| cart repair speed | down |
|
||||
| urgent buyers | up |
|
||||
| speculation | up |
|
||||
| rumor volume | up |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Secondary Effects (7–30 days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Effect | Direction |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| timber prices in Capua | up |
|
||||
| transport rates | up |
|
||||
| farm implement delays | up |
|
||||
| building delays | up |
|
||||
| substitute imports | up |
|
||||
| theft risk for lumber | up |
|
||||
| contractor credit stress | up |
|
||||
| state requisition pressure | possible |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Tertiary Effects (30+ days)
|
||||
|
||||
| Effect | Direction |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| regional forest extraction | up |
|
||||
| road congestion | up |
|
||||
| poor-quality substitutes used | possible |
|
||||
| migration of craftsmen | possible |
|
||||
| durable merchant contracts | possible |
|
||||
| local political realignment | possible |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Merchant Venture Logic (Ostia -> Capua)
|
||||
|
||||
Merchant departs Ostia before Capua fully reprices.
|
||||
|
||||
### Candidate Cargo Ventures
|
||||
|
||||
| Cargo | Thesis |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| nails / fasteners | rebuild demand |
|
||||
| bronze tools | carpentry recovery |
|
||||
| iron tools | substitute demand |
|
||||
| rope | hauling operations |
|
||||
| pitch / tar | treatment and repair |
|
||||
| wheel hardware | transport bottleneck relief |
|
||||
| food staples | urgent crews and displaced labor |
|
||||
|
||||
### Separate Financial Opportunities (Non-Cargo)
|
||||
|
||||
These are distinct NEGOTIA and should not be modeled as cargo:
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Thesis |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| short-term lending | distressed contractor liquidity |
|
||||
| advance purchase contracts | lock future timber supply |
|
||||
| debt claim acquisition | buy impaired obligations cheaply |
|
||||
| partnership finance | fund rebuild for future share |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Linked Scenario Logic (with 0001)
|
||||
|
||||
If SCENARIO-MERCHANT-0001 occurred recently:
|
||||
|
||||
- fewer bronze tools available regionally
|
||||
- timber processing slower
|
||||
- rebuild costs higher
|
||||
- cart shortages worsen transport delays
|
||||
- price spikes intensify
|
||||
|
||||
Scenarios should compound rather than exist in isolation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Parameters With Confidence Tags
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter Token | Type | Confidence | Basis |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| timber_stock_destroyed | resource | High | direct scenario state |
|
||||
| yard_damage_level | event | High | direct scenario state |
|
||||
| timber_price_capua | market | Medium | standard shortage response |
|
||||
| carpentry_capacity | production | Medium | dependent workshops |
|
||||
| transport_rate_capua | market | Medium | cart scarcity + urgency |
|
||||
| implement_delay_days | temporal | Medium | backlog effects |
|
||||
| sabotage_rumor_credibility | information | Low | social inference |
|
||||
| state_requisition_pressure | political | Low | contingent context |
|
||||
| venture_window_days | opportunity | Medium | route duration + repricing lag |
|
||||
| theft_risk_lumber | security | Low | scarcity response |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Relations
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
timber_stock_destroyed ↑ -> timber_price_capua ↑
|
||||
timber_price_capua ↑ -> import_incentive_ostia_to_capua ↑
|
||||
carpentry_capacity ↓ -> building_delay ↑
|
||||
wheelwright_capacity ↓ -> transport_rate_capua ↑
|
||||
transport_rate_capua ↑ -> food_prices ↑
|
||||
implement_delay_days ↑ -> agricultural_output_risk ↑
|
||||
rumor_credibility ↑ -> speculative_buying ↑
|
||||
state_requisition_pressure ↑ -> civilian_access ↓
|
||||
recent_scenario_0001 == true -> recovery_speed ↓
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 13. Replayability Controls
|
||||
|
||||
Randomize:
|
||||
|
||||
- hidden cause
|
||||
- severity
|
||||
- stock saved percentage
|
||||
- rival merchant speed
|
||||
- military urgency
|
||||
- road delays
|
||||
- theft wave
|
||||
- magistrate intervention
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 14. Repository Use
|
||||
|
||||
Internal simulation substrate. Not player-facing text.
|
||||
|
||||
Use to validate:
|
||||
|
||||
- precursor material economics
|
||||
- scenario chaining
|
||||
- route-constrained arbitrage
|
||||
- hidden information systems
|
||||
- cascading shortages
|
||||
- regional price propagation
|
||||
- cargo vs finance NEGOTIVM distinction
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 15. Canonical Success Condition
|
||||
|
||||
If the participant stops asking:
|
||||
|
||||
“What burned?”
|
||||
|
||||
and starts asking:
|
||||
|
||||
“What depended on it?”
|
||||
|
||||
then the scenario is functioning correctly.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user