obsolete

2026-04-30 15:12:18 -04:00
parent 06d278653b
commit 98277829bb
1 changed files with 0 additions and 225 deletions
--- a/docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
+++ b/docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
@@ -1,225 +0,0 @@
 # CORPUS-0015
 ## Warehouse Space As Asset
 ### Status: Training Corpus Seed
 ### Layer: Layer_1--Worked_Examples
 ### Purpose: Teach that storage capacity can function as an asset, access right, cost reducer, timing tool, and collateral support
 ### Repository Path: docs/training/corpus/Layer_1--Worked_Examples/CORPUS-0015-warehouse-space-as-asset.md
 ---
 ## 0. Scenario
 A trader in Ostia has access to warehouse space.
 He does not own the warehouse.
 He holds a recognized right to store goods in one section for a limited time.
 This storage access changes what ventures he can attempt.
 Warehouse space is not only a place where goods wait.
 It can affect price, timing, spoilage, bargaining power, credit, and risk.
 ---
 ## 1. Basic Situation
 The trader buys oil in Ostia.
 He can either:
 1. sell quickly at a lower price, because he has nowhere to hold the oil
 2. store the oil safely and wait for a better buyer
 3. consolidate the oil with other goods for a larger shipment
 4. use stored goods as evidence of capacity when seeking credit
 The same oil has different economic possibilities depending on storage access.
 ---
 ## 2. Known Facts
 | Fact | Value |
 |---|---:|
 | Good | oil |
 | Purchase value | 20 asses |
 | Immediate local resale value | 22 asses |
 | Expected future sale value | 30 asses |
 | Warehouse access duration | 10 days |
 | Storage fee | 3 asses |
 | Handling cost | 2 asses |
 | Spoilage/leakage risk | low if stored properly |
 ---
 ## 3. Immediate Sale Calculation
 If the trader sells immediately:
 ```text
 sale value = 22 asses
 purchase value = 20 asses
 result = 2 asses profit
 ```
 The sale is simple.
 But the trader may be giving up a better timed sale because he lacks or ignores storage value.
 ---
 ## 4. Storage-And-Wait Calculation
 If the trader stores the oil and sells later:
 ```text
 purchase value = 20 asses
 storage fee = 3 asses
 handling cost = 2 asses
 total cost = 25 asses
 future sale value = 30 asses
 result = 5 asses profit
 ```
 Storage added cost.
 But it also allowed the trader to wait for a better sale.
 The warehouse space produced value by preserving timing flexibility.
 ---
 ## 5. When Storage Is A Bad Asset
 Storage is not always beneficial.
 If the expected future sale does not appear:
 ```text
 purchase value = 20 asses
 storage fee = 3 asses
 handling cost = 2 asses
 final sale value = 23 asses
 result = 2 asses loss
 ```
 The trader would have been better selling immediately.
 Storage increases flexibility but also adds cost and delay.
 ---
 ## 6. Access Right Versus Ownership
 The trader does not need to own the warehouse.
 He may have:
 - temporary storage permission
 - rented space
 - priority access through relationship
 - a corner of a larger warehouse
 - storage granted as part of another bargain
 - space controlled through a partner or patron
 Each arrangement has different security and enforceability.
 The model must distinguish warehouse ownership from warehouse access.
 ---
 ## 7. Warehouse Space As Credit Support
 Stored goods may support credit.
 A seller or lender may extend trust because goods are visible, held, and countable.
 Example:
 ```text
 stored oil value = 20 asses
 credit extended = 12 asses
 ```
 The warehouse space does not create coin directly.
 It helps make the stored goods credible as backing for future settlement.
 ---
 ## 8. Warehouse Space As Bargaining Tool
 A trader with storage can wait.
 A trader without storage may be forced to sell quickly.
 This changes bargaining power.
 | Condition | Effect |
 |---|---|
 | no storage | seller may accept low price |
 | secure storage | seller can wait |
 | scarce storage | storage fee rises |
 | wet or unsafe storage | spoilage risk rises |
 | recognized storage right | goods are more credible |
 Storage changes time pressure.
 Time pressure changes price.
 ---
 ## 9. Correct Model Behavior
 The model should ask:
 - who owns the warehouse?
 - who controls access?
 - how long may the trader store goods?
 - what fee or obligation is attached?
 - are the goods protected from damage?
 - can the stored goods support credit?
 - does storage reduce distress selling?
 - does storage delay create better price or extra cost?
 - can access be withdrawn or challenged?
 Warehouse space is an economic position, not only a location.
 ---
 ## 10. Incorrect Model Behavior
 The model should not:
 - treat storage as free
 - treat warehouse access as ownership
 - ignore storage duration
 - ignore handling cost
 - ignore spoilage or leakage risk
 - ignore the ability to wait
 - ignore storage as credit support
 - assume every trader has equal storage access
 - ignore loss if future price fails to rise
 ---
 ## 11. Layer-0 Concepts Used
 This example uses:
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0004-cost-includes-more-than-purchase-price`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0005-profit-is-sale-minus-total-cost`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0006-delay-is-economic-cost`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0009-liquidity-differs-from-wealth`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0010-credit-depends-on-trust`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0012-every-venture-risks-loss`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0021-assets-can-be-productive-or-passive`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0022-rights-can-have-economic-value`
 - `Layer_0/CORPUS-0023-ownership-use-and-income-can-separate`
 ---
 ## 12. Success Condition
 If the model sees warehouse space and asks how it changes timing, storage cost, bargaining power, risk, access, and credit support before calculating the venture, this file is functioning correctly.